For Bibi, time for talk is past

March 10, 2014

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to last week’s National Conference of the America-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was another rhetorical tour-de-force by this most silvered-tongued of Israeli leaders.

Netanyahu again promised to defend Israel against an Iranian nuclear threat and to be beholden to no other nation in his zeal to protect his people. There were applause lines for almost everyone.

He attacked efforts to orchestrate boycotts, disinvestment and sanctions against Israel in withering terms. He extolled Israeli medical advances and water conservation achievements, highlighted Israel’s role in treating victims of the Syrian civil war and envisaged Israeli strategic and economic cooperation with Arab Gulf States.

Netanyahu demanded that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state, but he also spoke in soaring terms about the benefits of peace and a two-state solution.

Netanyahu has always been a wonderful speaker. For many reporters, myself among them, our first contact with him came during the 1980s, when he was Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations and delivered many stirring speeches in defense of his country.

Later, he was spokesman for the Israeli delegation to the Madrid Peace Conference in 1991. In his frequent TV interviews with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer during the U.S. war with Iraq that year, Netanyahu expertly explained Israel’s position and perspectives.

However, Netanyahu may trust words a bit too much. Perhaps this is why he places such an emphasis on wringing out of the Palestinians an acknowledgment that Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people.

Such a statement will have great symbolic significance no doubt, but words alone do not necessarily create new realities. Words remain words.

In Israel’s political history, the ability to deliver a great speech has not always equated with great political leadership. Menachem Begin was an electrifying speaker and as prime minister he rallied the nation in favor of the 1979 peace treaty with Egypt that entailed evacuating Israeli settlements in Sinai. But he later misled the Israeli people about the aims of his 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which turned into a bloody quagmire.

By contrast, Yitzhak Rabin was a relatively poor orator. His delivery was wooden and monotonous and he searched, often in vain, for the memorable phrase. But he spoke with such conviction and moral authority that people believed him, despite — or perhaps because of — his lack of fluency.

In the Book of Exodus, when God summons Moses at the burning bush to lead his people, Moses at first demurs, saying, “O my Lord, I am not eloquent … but I am slow of speech and of a slow tongue.” God responds that his brother Aaron can act as spokesman but that only Moses has the unique qualities to lead. In other words, you can always hire a spokesman but leadership carries different requirements, among them courage, conviction, vision and decisiveness.

This is the challenge that now confronts Netanyahu. We know he can speak — but can he lead? Fine words finely spoken are important and have their place, but the time is coming for Netanyahu to take action and to finally decide whether to accept the peace framework being put forward by Secretary of State John Kerry.

In a sense, almost everything Netanyahu says between now and taking that decision is beside the point. Only the decision itself counts and only the decision will be remembered.

If he decides to move forward, and if Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas does the same, we will have a chance of ending this conflict. If Netanyahu decides against it, the chance to make peace may not return for a very long time.

Netanyahu’s eloquence is a huge asset that will come into play again once he commits to peace. He will need to use that ability to mobilize Israelis behind him and to counter the inevitable attacks against him that will come from the settler movement and those opposed to a two-state solution.

But those memorable speeches lie ahead. Right now, what counts are not words, but deeds. Netanyahu must search his soul and make a decision. He must lead Israel toward peace. That will be his legacy and secure his place in Israel’s history.

Otherwise, he risks being remembered as a great purveyor of hot air.

PHOTO: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington, March 4, 2014. REUTERS/Mike Theiler


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

This is cool

Posted by jennyfox | Report as abusive

Netanyahu can lead Israel to peace. He can also lead Israel to the opposite of peace. In recent years, he seems to have been doing much more of the latter.

Posted by delta5297 | Report as abusive

The real key here is the “Jewish”ness of the state being acknowledged. Perhaps the growing arab population’s potential to be a majority is the real issue? Can’t happen if the state is only for Jews.

Just because you wave around a book and declare that your special invisible friend promised everything to you…. well, it’s hardly sane, let alone just.

Posted by euro-yank | Report as abusive

The fear that causes Arab governments to generate unprecedented hate toward Israel is something that the vast majority of the globe has turned their backs to. This fear, of an educated, intelligent population, can lead to a different style of Arab government that would emphasize economic health for their people instead of hate. A culture with a lot to lose will not commit suicide/genocide for the sake of hatred. An Israeli/Arab Mid East economic sphere would be the situation that would keep these petty, hate mongers from leadership. This is what they fear, so they kill all moderates and pocket the international baksheesh.

Posted by rikfre | Report as abusive

Isreal’s government is an apartheid government. If they were interested in peace they would have stopped all of the illegal settlements years ago.

They violate US security council resolutions, violate international law with there stupid occupation.

They need to learn from Hezbollah. The only way to get a Jewish terrorist out of your home is with a gun.

Posted by KyleDexter | Report as abusive

This is a most interesting article. Just ignore contextual information and replace the name Nethanyau with that of president Obama: the underlying message for the American people will become crystal clear. That´s why Voltaire advised: ‘Il faut cultiver notre jardin”. So much obsessive attention with the neighboor´s garden and such pitiful results with his own.

Posted by moradavig | Report as abusive