Our fierce fight over torture

By Ari Melber
March 13, 2014

The new Congress versus the CIA battle over “hacking” Senate computers and “spying” isn’t about surveillance. It’s about torture.

We have never had a full reckoning for our government’s use of torture on terror suspects after September 11. There were no prosecutions of military officers or senior officials. (One soldier was imprisoned for abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison, former Corporal Charles Graner, while four officers received administrative demerits, not prosecution.) Remarkably, there has not even been a full release of classified government investigations into U.S. torture. It’s hard to get accountability in the dark.

That repressed history is the real context for the remarkable fight that spilled into public view when Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) spoke on the Senate floor on Tuesday.

There have been attempts by Congress, human rights groups and the press to pursue information about the torture — or “enhanced interrogation” program — that the Bush administration’s CIA began in 2002.

The exposure of torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq appeared in a 2004 Seymour Hersh article in the New Yorker, not from the government. Further public reports pushed President George W. Bush to disclose and defend the program in 2006.

Leaks then surfaced about crucial evidence that documented some interrogation sessions, which could factually resolve debates between the administration and critics over how far the interrogation went. The CIA had recorded the interrogation sessions. Before Congress or independent investigations could review the video tapes, however, the CIA’s lawyers destroyed them in 2007. In many contexts, that action alone is a crime — obstruction of justice.

Congress responded to the destruction of the tapes by launching a limited review of those interrogations. In 2009, the review found the CIA sessions were different, and far harsher, than the agency had claimed.

This drove the usually hawkish Senate Intelligence Committee, headed by Feinstein, to a bureaucratic breaking point. Faced with the CIA’s apparent misrepresentations and possible criminal obstruction to cover up a possible crime, the panel held a bipartisan vote to conduct a full investigation.

The revelations about the CIA’s continued efforts to subvert that investigation is what sparked the current constitutional crisis — and the unusual floor speech by Feinstein, a longtime CIA ally.

Feinstein recounted how her committee “voted 14 to 1 to initiate a comprehensive review of the CIA detention and interrogation program,” because it learned “the interrogations and conditions of confinement at the CIA detention sites were far different and far more harsh than the way the CIA had described them to” Congress.

She recounted how Senate investigators strained to accommodate CIA requests for this “independent” review, such as going to a CIA site to review digital files that remained under the agency’s control. When the CIA learned that the Senate staff found incriminating internal CIA notes about the files, which reportedly contradicted the CIA’s public claims about the program, Feinstein said the CIA began looking into the Senate investigators’ work.

In other words, the CIA began investigating the investigators.

Feinstein says that act may be illegal, violating “the Fourth Amendment, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as Executive Order 12333, which prohibits the CIA from conducting domestic searches or surveillance.”

CIA Director John Brennan responded with a parsing denial, saying there has not been a “tremendous” level of CIA spying or hacking of Congress. What about, say, a small amount of illegal spying?

Other statements from Brennan and administration officials lean heavily on capacious words like “hacking” and “spying,” which have notoriously vague meanings, and plenty of wiggle room.

It doesn’t stop there. The most dangerous part of this crisis does not turn on the definition of hacking. It doesn’t depend on whether the CIA maliciously tried to kneecap the investigation, or just found ways to accidentally kneecap it.

The most dangerous move came from what the CIA did with the information that it gleaned from monitoring the Senate.

A top CIA lawyer took one of the most severe legal actions possible — officially asking the Justice Department to consider prosecuting the Senate investigators for doing their jobs.

Feinstein, backed by colleagues in both parties, said this tactic is an illegitimate attempt to get Senate staff to back off.

“There is no legitimate reason to allege to the Justice Department that Senate staff may have committed a crime,” she said on the Senate floor. “I view the acting general counsel’s referral as a potential effort to intimidate this staff — and I am not taking it lightly.”

This week, I spoke with congressional staff members who said even a small risk of prosecution for investigating the CIA would have a chilling effect.

Feinstein also drew a direct line from the CIA’s aggressive, provocative move, which threw the grenade of a separation of powers crisis into President Barack Obama’s Justice Department — back to exposing the history of torture. Where this all started.

“The staff members who have been working on this study and this [torture] report have devoted years of their lives to it,” she explained, “They are now being threatened with legal jeopardy, just as the final revisions to the report are being made so that parts of it can be declassified and released to the American people.”

These are remarkable public charges from one of the intelligence community’s most experienced allies in Congress — that when it comes to covering up torture, the CIA will try to criminalize public service and oversight itself.

This is not an academic exercise. The CIA’s moves already have practical consequences.

Right now the Justice Department, which closed its own criminal investigation into torture by U.S. officials with no charges, is reviewing a high-level referral to investigate and possibly charge U.S. officials for investigating torture.

This is more than backward — it is dangerous for our separation of powers. Do we have a functioning democracy? Or are we sliding into a system where there are checks and balances for the rest of us, but no rules for the CIA?

Obama largely ducked the big questions on Wednesday, saying the investigations will play out, but he is “absolutely committed to declassifying” the torture report.  But it is Obama’s employee, Brennan, who has been fighting that declassification.

So who is in charge here? The president either needs to get his CIA director in check, or get a new CIA director.


PHOTO (TOP): A demonstration outside the Supreme Court in Washington, 2005. REUTERS/Larry Downing

PHOTO (INSERT 1): President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney (C) and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld arrive to speak at the Pentagon, May 10, 2004.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

PHOTO (INSERT 2): Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) (C), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, speaks to reporters after departing a full-Senate briefing at the Capitol in Washington, June 13, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Photo (INSERT 3): White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan (R) listens as President Barack Obama nominates him to become the next CIA director at the White House in Washington January 7, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Greetings! Very useful advice within this post! It’s the little changes which will make the biggest changes. Many thanks for sharing!|

If you wish for to take much from this paragraph then you have to apply these techniques to your won weblog.|

Incredibly user pleasant site. Great info offered on few gos to.|

If some one wants to be updated with newest technologies therefore he must be go to see this web page and be up to date every day.|

You should be a part of a contest for one of the finest sites on the internet. I will highly recommend this site!|

Hey there this lotopyeer is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

whoah this weblog is magnificent i like reading your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, lots of individuals are searching around for this information, you can help them greatly. |

Greetings from Ohio! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the info you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, good blog!|

Hello, Neat post. There is an issue with your web site in internet explorer, would check this? IE still is the market leader and a good component to people will miss your magnificent writing due to this problem.|

Good day very cool website!! Guy .. Excellent .. Superb .. I will bookmark your web site and take the feeds also? I’m satisfied to search out a lot of helpful info here in the post, we need develop more strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .|

Thank you for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I am waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.|

I got this web site from my buddy who told me about this site and at the moment this time I am visiting this web page and reading very informative posts here.|

I just like the helpful information you supply for your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and test once more right here regularly. I’m reasonably certain I will be told plenty of new stuff proper right here! Good luck for the following!|

Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all folks you actually realize what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Please additionally talk over with my website =). We could have a link change contract between us|

Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon every day. It will always be interesting to read through content from other authors and practice a little something from other websites. |