If at first you don’t succeed in Iraq, Surge, Surge again

By Peter Van Buren
July 17, 2014

Major-General Hertling, the commander of U.S. forces in northern Iraq, walks during a battlefield circulation patrol on the streets in Mosul

America’s new strategy for resolving the Sunni-Shi’ite crisis in Iraq? The Surge — again.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey sounds as if he were reading off the 2007 script, echoing the divide-and-conquer strategy that was the basis for the Surge: “If you can separate those [Sunni] groups,” Dempsey said, “then the problem becomes manageable and understandable.”

So, Washington is now sending U.S. officials to meet with Sunni tribal leaders and others. The ultimate goal — after hopefully forcing out foreign fighters from within Sunni ranks in 2014, as in 2007 — is political reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite.

It won’t work, because it hasn’t.

History is, in the end, all that matters. In January 2007, following signs that the metastasizing Sunni-Shi’ite conflict in Iraq was not about to stop without some new sort of intervention, then-President George W. Bush announced the Surge. The most public component was the deployment of 26,000 additional military personnel to Iraq, a clenched fist of freedom.

U.S. Lt. General David Petraeus (R), commander of the 101st. Airborne Division shakes hands with an ..But there was another side: a plan to take advantage of fissures inside the bloc of Sunni forces, primarily those between foreign fighters such as al Qaeda and the local Sunni tribes. U.S. forces created a cadre of local Sunnis, first dubbed the Orwellian “Concerned Local Citizens” and later renamed the Sahwa, or Sons of Iraq, to cleave off al Qaeda through an Awakening.

In return for Iraqi Sunnis partnering with coalition forces, Washington would pay them well to guard checkpoints and do temporary make-work.

With an eye toward the exits in 2009, Washington attempted to shift the Sahwa payments to Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s Shi’ite-dominated government. Maliki, however, did not continue most of the payments and reneged on his promise to find real jobs for the Sons of Iraq.

The United States walked away from the problem. The Sunni-Shi’ite crisis, kicked off by the near-complete chaos of 2003 and unresolved by the Surge, was left to simmer.

I saw it happen. As a State Department Foreign Service officer, I worked in some of the same areas again consumed by sectarian fighting. In 2009, I had begun hearing from Sunni tribal leaders that the Shi’ite government was not finding decent work for their young men — only about 20 percent were ultimately given any job. Payments from the Iraqi government had also trailed off nationwide. For example, 50 percent of the Sahwa had not been paid in April and May 2010.

One terrifying day, I was sent out to assure a heavily armed Sunni warlord that he should be patient. We were, after all, building a democracy in Iraq. So a few late payments could be expected.

That long afternoon, over many glasses of too-sweet tea, the warlord explained to me how efforts to keep disparate but loosely allied groups separate but content stretched back to his great-grandfather and the Ottoman Turks and had continued with his grandfather and the British occupiers. It was also a standard tool of control under Saddam Hussein.

But deals had to be honored. His message was blunt: If the Maliki government did not fulfill its promises of jobs, money and a political role for the Sunnis, he would send his men back to war.

Not a threat per se. More of an attempt to explain to an amateur like me how divide-and-conquer was played — by someone whose family had been at it long enough that they likely helped invent the game.

Iraqi soldiers take part in a parade to mark a handover ceremony in KutWith the Sunni-Shi’ite simmer now at full boil, U.S. officials are again “seeking ways to exploit emerging fissures between the militant group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Levant [ISIL] and Iraqi extremist groups allied with it.” They are again talking about reconciliation. Sound familiar?

A Shi’ite government has been in power since 2006, and political reconciliation has still not taken place. Quite the opposite, in fact. Post-occupation, Sunnis were singled out for arrest, torture and recrimination. Sunni Vice President Tariq al Hashimi was sentenced to death in 2012 and remains in exile.

A diverse group of Sunni fighters has controlled western Iraq, including the city of Fallujah, since January. The Shi’ite government’s response was to attack, not reconcile. Despite a $25- billion training investment by the United States, the Iraqi Army is crippled by sectarianism. Maliki has turned to the same militias who fought the Sunnis during the insurgency. The Iraqi air force airlifted some 4,000 civilian Shi’ite “volunteers” to Ramadi to fight against Sunnis. Iraqi security forces and militias executed at least 255 Sunni prisoners since early June. At least eight were under age 18.

The Iraqi political process looks static. A Shi’ite will likely be the next prime minister, perhaps even Maliki again. Since 2006, the United States has maintained its largest embassy in Baghdad. All those diplomats have not accomplished much toward reconciliation. The Islamic State, as ISIL now calls itself, did not appear as some byproduct of the Syrian mess; it evolved in response to recent history. And for the Sunnis, history is what matters now.

Dempsey is right about one thing. The Sunnis who make up the Islamic State are a diverse group of foreign fighters, tribal warlords, politicized jihadis and secular Baathists. There are significant fissures among them. Yet despite their differences, there is collectively little good will toward the Shi’ite Iraqi government. And a powerful sense of a common enemy.

So any limited Sunni-on-Sunni violence should not be misinterpreted. The Surge failed on these points with the full weight of the U.S. military behind it. Any small-scale attempt to duplicate the Surge will likely yield the same results.

 

PHOTO (TOP): Major-General Mark Hertling (C), the commander of the U.S. forces in northern Iraq, walks during a battlefield circulation patrol on the streets in Mosul, June 19, 2008. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

PHOTO (INSERT 1): Lieutenant General David Petraeus (R), commander of the 101st. Airborne Division, shakes hands with an Iraqi Army soldier celebrating his graduation in Kirkush Military Training base, [130 km northeast of the capital Baghdad], July 8, 2004. REUTERS/Archive

PHOTO (INSERT 2): Iraqi soldiers take part in a parade to mark a handover ceremony in Kut, 150 km (95 miles) southeast of Baghdad, October 29, 2008. REUTERS/Jaafer Abed

 

679 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular article! It’s the little changes that will make the largest changes. Many thanks for sharing!

I seriously love your blog.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m planning to create my very own site and want to learn where you got this from or what the theme is named. Many thanks!

There’s definately a great deal to learn about this topic. I really like all the points you’ve made.

You need to take part in a contest for one of the highest quality websites online. I will recommend this website!

The most comprehensive and very effectively thought out write up I’ve discovered on this topic on the net. Keep on writing, I will maintain on coming by to read your new content material. This really is my fourth time coming by your weblog.

My spouse and I definitely adore your weblog and uncover almost all of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content within your case? I wouldn’t mind publishing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write related to here. Again, awesome weblog!

That is a very good tip especially to those fresh to the blogosphere. Simple but very precise information… Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read article!

Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you penning this write-up and the rest of the site is very good.

Woh I like your content material , saved to favorites ! .

Loving the information on this internet site, you’ve got done wonderful job on the posts .

Saved as a favorite, I really like your web site!

Wow! This could be one specific of the most valuable blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this topic. Basically Excellent. I’m also an expert in this subject therefore I can comprehend your effort.

Paper rolls… quite excellent read you know alot about this topic i see!…

There is perceptibly a bunch to know about this. I think you made some nice points in features also.

Definitely, what a fantastic website and illuminating posts, I will bookmark your site.All the Best!

Great write-up, I am normal visitor of one¡¦s blog, maintain up the nice operate, and It is going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

Echt tolle Seite. Rubbish bin eigentlich nur per Zufall hier gelandet, aber ich bin jetzt schon complete von der tremendous Seite beeindruckt. Gratuliere dazu!! Viel Erfolg noch durch der sehr guten Home-page mein Freund.

Howdy! This post could not be written any better! Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He continually kept talking about this. I most certainly will forward this article to him. Fairly certain he will have a very good read. Thanks for sharing!

When I initially commented I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I receive four emails with the same comment. There has to be a way you are able to remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!