The best weapon to fight the Islamic State is already in Iraq

By Robert Caruso
August 28, 2014

A Kurdish Peshmerga fighter stands guard at the Bakirta frontline near the town of Makhmur

In 21st century Iraq, the enemy is not a state, though it calls itself one. The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is a group of Islamist insurgents whose presence stretches across the border between Syria and Iraq.

The only way to defeat the Islamic State is through military force, but Americans will not be doing the fighting on the ground. General John Allen, who commanded NATO forces in Afghanistan, has observed that, “the Kurds, the Sunnis and the Free Syrian resistance elements of the region are the ‘boots on the ground’ necessary to the success of this campaign.”

Make no mistake: dismantling a nascent Islamic State is a serious undertaking, involving thousands of U.S. personnel and a robust interagency effort. The insurgents are ruthless, resourceful and are adept at weaving themselves into the fabric of the region, making them virtually undetectable until they strike. If President Barack Obama’s strategy is to “contain” ISIL, not destroy it, as the New York Times reported on Aug.  22, he will fail.

Masked and without a uniform, ISIL is impossible to fight using the doctrines of the past. Airstrikes and raids will fail to do damage without actionable intelligence. To keep pace with and then overtake ISIL, the U.S. Central Command should first select a widely respected four-star officer to lead a new joint task force. It would operate inside Syria and Iraq, and along the Turkish and Iranian borders. No Burger Kings or Best Buys on this base.

And every part of the U.S. intelligence and military apparatus has to work together; just they did with the interagency Joint Task Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2003.

It still takes a network,” as Travis Wheeler, a graduate student at Tuft University’s The Fletcher School, writes. This will involve killing and capturing militants, as well as engaging in denial, deception, sabotage and subversion.

To protect the U.S. consulate in Arbil, peshmerga (as the Kurdish fighters are known) should be provided with Javelin antitank missiles, armored personnel carriers and night-vision equipment. Arbil is home to one of the longest runways in the world, but the Kurds do not have a viable air force and are dependent on Baghdad for air support. This should be rectified immediately by deploying the 6th Special Operations Squadron, which specializes in building air forces from the ground up. The Kurds’ nascent air force should be given Super Tucano propeller planes and its pilots instructed on how to fly them in combat. Other rotary and fixed-wing aircraft could operate out of Arbil’s airport, allowing French, U.S. and British aircraft to be closer to the fight. Navy Seabees construction battalions and U.S. Air Force Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair Squadron Engineers can construct new hangars in a matter of days.

A drone-centric strategy hasn’t worked well in Yemen and Pakistan to permanently end the threat of terrorism, and will not work at all in Syria and Iraq. Without granular intelligence, drones have no way of distinguishing between combatants and noncombatants. Obama has authorized as many as 60 intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance flights of manned and unmanned aircraft per day, but that is insufficient. ISIL militants act like terrorists but think like street criminals and as such are not susceptible to intercept by the National Security Agency.

“They are everywhere, yet they are nowhere,” the intellectual godfather of counterinsurgency, David Galula, famously observed. It remains true. Radical Islamists do not talk on phones about operations, and when they do it is meant to deceive.

It is also hard to fight the Islamic State in Syria through the air, both because of surface-to-air emplacements in Syria and surface-to-air missiles the Islamist group is rumored to possess. This is a fundamental issue for the counterinsurgency, and a fingertip feel of the environment will be essential to capture and kill the right people.

To hurt ISIL, it must first be understood. Drug Enforcement Agency and FBI personnel, working alongside Joint Special Operations Command and the CIA should capture and interrogate as many militants as possible, in a lawful manner. This would allow interrogators to discern the true size, nature and intentions of the militants, as well as disrupt future operations and even court double agents.

Meantime, functioning as an intelligence “trawler,” select peshmerga should be trained to use clandestine tagging and tracking of equipment. Using this technology, U.S. and coalition aircraft would be able to identify vehicles and individuals from the air and on the ground using special chemicals. ISIL’ expertise in urban fortification and military deception ensures civilian casualties unless this capability is built.

Unfortunately, Iran cannot be considered a credible partner in Iraq. The advance of ISIL threatens Iran’s position throughout the region, in particular its influence on Iraq and Syria. The United States should capitalize on Iranian fears and arm Kurdish groups across the region, There are as many as 5 million Kurds in Iran. They don’t fear Iran’s paramilitaries and have proven to be fierce and unrelenting fighters. Elements of the Kurdish Democratic Party in Iran have declared “the whole world is afraid of Iran, and Iran is afraid of our peshmerga.”

This would afford Western intelligence agencies a talent pool from which to recruit.

A well-armed peshmerga and renewed investment in proven intelligence techniques will be critical to combating extremists inside and outside of Iraq. America can stand tall with the Kurds, cripple Iran’s paramilitary capability, and destroy the Islamic State, but must act decisively and creatively—today.

 

PHOTO: A Kurdish Peshmerga fighter stands guard at the Bakirta frontline near the town of Makhmur, south of Arbil, the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan August 27, 2014. REUTERS/Youssef Boudlal 

23 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

YA GREAT! lET’S GET THE NEXT STUPID WAR GOING.Arm the Kurds. The Turks will Be delighted. After invading a stable if dictatorial sovereign state, kicking out the relatively harmless Bath party. and destabilizing the whole nation under a mistaken pretext of stopping imaginary “weapons of mass destruction” the U.S. left Iraq in chaos and in the hands of a puppet government. Now that the place is assured of mayhem and destruction for the forseable future let’s throw more gasoline on the fire. Get the hell out and leave bad enough alone. P.S. Any western civilian that goes to these places is too foolhardy for words. God rest their soles.

Posted by houndog1 | Report as abusive

Too funny. An American arm chair war general dictating how to fight in a country so little understood. Where are the voices from Iraq? These are the voices who can best lay out how to fight this ISIS entity?

From my armchair view – give ownership and you will see ISIS eradicated.

There are 3 main entities in Iraq. Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds. Give them each a country to call their own and let them clean up the garbage. Trust me – they will do this fast. In the mix will be collateral damage – similar to India and Yugoslavia splitting up into ethnic groups and now they are very stable.

Send in more money and troops to collar groups that hate each other and you will just create more ISIS.

Posted by Butch_from_PA | Report as abusive

All this sounds fine, but with a bumbling president who’s strategy is not to make mistakes, none of this will happen. While TV pundits are often wrong, I give credit to those conservative and other TV hosts who clearly stated two and three years ago that if we did not support the moderate rebels in Syria, the radicals would take over. They have, and their cause has attracted many young Islamic fighters from all over the world. We allowed this. If the author were in charge a few years ago, we wouldn’t be in this mess. Unfortunately, in the US the electorate is more and more filled with kids who care more about their I-phones than their country and get all their news from Jon Stewart. As long as they keep electing bone-heads like President Obama, don’t expect any change. It will only get worse. He is more worried about calling the Fort Hood massacre “workplace violence” rather than Islamic terrorism than he is about the Christians, Muslims, Yazidis, etc. who are being raped, killed and tortured in Iraq and Syria. The only reason he did anything was because the there was political pressure to act. He will only react to the polls and will only do the minimum necessary.

Posted by Bones888 | Report as abusive