Can the White House really be protected?

October 1, 2014

Secret Service agents await the arrival of U.S. Presidential candidate Obama in Durham

When an armed intruder jumped the fence and penetrated deep into the White House, it provided a field day for cartoonists and some members of the House of Representatives — who turned Julia Pierson, the hapless Secret Service director, into a piñata at a hearing Tuesday.

President Barack Obama and his family, fortunately, had left for the weekend before the intrusion. Omar J. Gonzalez, an Iraq Army veteran, said he wanted to warn the president,  “the atmosphere was collapsing.” But the incident raised serious questions about the chief executive’s safety in his own home.

U.S. Secret Service Director Julia Pierson testifies on Capitol Hill in WashingtonThe White House is usually described as the most heavily guarded residence in the nation. Uniformed Secret Service patrol the perimeter, backed by a SWAT team with automatic weapons. An attack dog, a Belgian Malinois, is trained to take down any intruder. The dog was not released on Sept. 19, however, when Gonzalez got in the unlocked front door. He made it all the way through the ceremonial East Room, possibly overpowering a female guard, before he was tackled and finally stopped by an off-duty Secret Service agent.

The executive mansion is supposedly protected day and night, surrounded by a no-fly zone. Its windows are bulletproof. Its air may be screened to foil biological or chemical attacks.

Could more be done to make the building safer? Exotic technology might be introduced. Theoretically, at least at night, laser beams, so enamored by Hollywood movies about museum heists and jewel thefts, could be positioned on the ground floor to set off alarms. But that would be impractical in the living quarters on the second floor. And what if Bo and Sunny the first family’s frisky Portuguese water dogs triggered the laser beam alarms?

Other James Bond-type security could be established. Motion detectors, for example, could be planted in the lawn and trigger a concealed second security fence with sharp spikes that would pop up out of the ground and stop intruders long enough for guards to disable them.

Sealed thick glass doors could be installed on the stairways leading up to the family quarters. Even if an intruder or assault team got in the White House, these doors would at least buy time for agents to close in on the threat.

But other security measures, such as those used by government intelligence agencies, would be of little use in the White House. In the CIA, for example, many offices cannot be entered except through locks with push-button combinations known only to authorized users. These are designed to keep some employees or visitors out of high-security areas where they might see and identify covert officers. But the CIA has thousands of employees, the White House has a far smaller staff, without the same need to cordon off high-security  areas or protect covert identities.

U.S. Secret Service officers detain a man after he reportedly threw firecrackers over the fence of the White House in WashingtonNor can the White House distance itself from Washington. The CIA is out in the woods in Langley, Virginia, the National Security Agency, the government’s eavesdropping and code-breaking arm, is far from the capital in Fort Meade, Maryland. That isolation would not work for the White House, a symbol of America that has to be highly visible and sits in the middle of the capital, where millions of visitors pass through its public rooms every year.

In the end, low-tech solutions may prove more effective than sophisticated  technology. More security cameras, better lighting, more guards, silent alarms and random checks to insure that uniformed agents are alert and at their stations may provide more safety to the president than electronic gadgetry.

The government could also build higher fences. Or push the pedestrian barriers further away, as it did after the fence-jumper incident on Sept. 19.

But there are limits to technological and physical security. The White House, after all, is the people’s house and a residence for the president and his family. The Secret Service has to balance the president’s protection against the perception that the executive mansion has become an inaccessible medieval castle, with battlements and moat.

The executive mansion is already less accessible to the public than in past years. In 1995, after the Oklahoma City federal building was bombed, Pennsylvania Avenue was closed to traffic to prevent an attacker with a car bomb from getting near the White House.

The White House should definitely lock the front door — as most home owners in urban areas like Washington do. But the unpalatable but sadly true fact is that there is no way to provide complete protection to the president.

Secret Service agents surround US Democratic presidential nominee Senator Obama as he steps out of his vehicle in RoanokeThe point was driven home late Tuesday, after a House committee had bombarded Pierson with hostile questions. The Washington Post reported that on Sept. 16, three days before the White House intruder, an armed security contractor shared an elevator with Obama during the president’s trip to Atlanta to review the Ebola crisis with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  The CDC contractor was fired and turned over his gun to Secret Service agents.

A study commissioned for the Secret Service in the 1990s, the Washington Post has reported, found that a half-dozen fence jumpers, acting in unison, would overwhelm the uniformed officers and some would make it into the White House.  Or if a small plane or helicopter crashed onto the grounds, the study concluded, at least one or two attackers who get inside the building. A mortar fired from one of the park areas south of the White House could hit the building and do extensive damage.

On Nov. 11, 2011 a man, who was later arrested, fired at least seven bullets that hit the White House. He believed the government was trying to control the country by implanting GPS chips in children and that Obama was “the anti-Christ.”  The president and his wife were in California, but his younger daughter, Sasha, and First Lady Michelle Obama’s mother were in the residence. It took the Secret Service several days even to realize that the shots had hit the White House.

In 1974, an Army private stole a helicopter and landed on the south lawn of the White House. Again in 1994, a man crashed a Cessna on the south lawn and skidded into the corner of the first floor. He died in the crash, which was ruled a probable suicide.  President Bill Clinton and his family were not home.

Clinton was reportedly not close to James Woolsey, his CIA director.  At the time, of the airplane crash, a joke circulated in Washington that the plane on the lawn was Woolsey, trying to get an appointment with the president.

In theory, a no-fly zone over Washington, known as ADIZ, protects the White House and the Capitol and other targets.  It did not stop the Sept. 11 terrorists on from crashing an airliner into the Pentagon, however.  And the al Qaeda terrorists who hijacked United Airlines Flight 93 were believed to be planning to crash into the White House or the Capitol. The plane went down instead in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers fought with the terrorists.

The 9/11 attacks, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963, and the 1990s study demonstrated the obvious — that political leaders and even the White House itself cannot be fully insulated from determined attackers.

The latest fence-jumping episode showed that the Secret Service needs to greatly improve its operations.  The budget cuts that reduced the number of officers who protect the White House, should be restored.

The incident also demonstrated the difficult task faced by Secret Service agents every day. Gonzalez, the fence-jumper, had been stopped by police in rural Virginia during the summer with an arsenal of weapons in his car, and a map with a line pointing to the White House. In August, the Secret Service saw him walking along the south fence with a hatchet. He was interviewed by the Secret Service in both cases, but they did not have enough reason to hold him as a threat to the president.

In a democratic society, citizens cannot be arrested for merely acting suspiciously or seeming eccentric. The Secret Service has sometimes hassled people at political gatherings where the president appears, but for the most part its agents do not abuse their power.

They are well aware that no amount of weaponry, floodlights, alarm systems and attack dogs can really protect the White House in a world of terrorists and suicide bombers.


PHOTO (TOP): Secret Service agents await the arrival of then Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama alongside his SUV at Raleigh-Durham airport in North Carolina, May 5, 2008. REUTERS/Jason Reed

PHOTO (INSERT 1): Secret Service Director Julia Pierson testifies at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington September 30, 2014.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

PHOTO (INSERT 2): Secret Service officers detain a man after he reportedly threw firecrackers over the fence of the White House, September 16, 2013. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

PHOTO (INSERT 3): Secret Service agents surround then Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama as he steps out of his vehicle to wave to the crowd in Roanoke, Virginia, October 17, 2008. REUTERS/Jim Young


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

The amateur performance at the White House starts at the top.

Posted by chains.shackles | Report as abusive

I don’t understand. The government hired a woman to head the Secret Service to make absolutely sure that agents don’t visit prostitutes. There are no prostitutes involved here, so what’s the problem? So what if the woman agent in the White House wasn’t up to the task of stopping an intruder? We should feel good the female agent is unlikely to visit prostitutes in her spare time. The Secret Service went through all that trouble a couple years ago to set their priorities straight, and people still complain…….

Posted by EtaMeer | Report as abusive

We were in London a few weeks ago, and saw security at Downing Street that appears to be the sad necessity of the modern age. The street is completely blocked by high fencing and there were several machine gun-toting guards on duty. This may warm your heart or chill your soul, depending on the perspective. Some of the suggestions in this article, such as a higher, stronger fence and perhaps a second row, along with more and better staffing, make sense, and could be done without giving the impression of an armed camp, which is not in keeping with our society’s principles of openness and transparency.

Posted by Oldbizeditor | Report as abusive

All the high-tech solutions you mention are unnecessary.

Lock the freakin’ door!!!

Posted by NewsLady | Report as abusive

Perhaps the ability of the intruder to access the White House had more to do with the ‘good old boy’ culture that no doubt exists within the Secret Service. What better way to make the female director look bad and force her resignation than to allow an intruder to breach the security?

Posted by RedRusty | Report as abusive

The White House needs protection from itself.

Posted by rikfre | Report as abusive

Technically speaking assassins and terrorists of professional caliber cannot be stopped. It is not possible, except to go to the extreme like our military industrialists want. You can however stop the occasional lunatic because they are typically not in their right minds and thus not thinking very well. The difficulty with the secret service job is that it is a job of repetition where thousands of repetitions are done before any possible or even suspitious event occurs. It’s tough to not start walking through it in a repetitive and semi-alert manner. It’s a hard job that most people, and probably all people commenting here, would be incapable of doing. The best we can hope is to stop the occasional lunatic and that is all we should plan to do. Life itself is not a permanent thing and we should not go to extremes to insist that the occasional bad event doesn’t happen. History tells us that in fact, it is mostly nuts that try and kill presidents. Foriegn entities know if they are found out to have underwritten an assasination their homeland is likely to become a flat glassy surface.

People can try and make a scandal out of this, but it looks more like a fake distraction to me. Probably similar to the NFL issues and Ebola. All just part of the fear mongering.

Posted by brotherkenny4 | Report as abusive

Perhaps the White House security staff require MRAPS… M-4’s. Totally militarize themselves?? If its acceptable for the local police forces around the country… then why not for the “Highest” security job in the country?? They also might think about locking the doors at night…

Posted by renagade112 | Report as abusive