Welcome back to the bad old days of American politics – only worse

January 21, 2015

Ben Holladay, Courtesy of the Oregon Historical Society; Charles Koch, REUTERS/Courtesy Koch Industries; Leland Stanford, Wikipedia/Courtesy of Bancroft Library, University of California – Berkeley

This is part of the Reuters series on the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, handed down Jan. 21, 2010. After five years, is anything the same in U.S. elections? You can read other pieces in the series here.


logo election-money--mahurin


The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United is five years old, which makes it the age of a kindergartner. By all signs the kid is a bully, making everything around him a little bit worse.

Political campaigns are more expensive. Voting has fallen to near historically low levels. Political messages grow simpler and more moronic.  As the child grows, he promises to make things a whole lot worse.

Five years is a long time in American politics, but it is a relatively short time in U.S. history. The conflicts Citizens United has provoked around money in politics and political speech are important. But they are only skirmishes in two long-running and related battles.

The first has been over who gets to participate in American politics. The second is over who gets to frame the debate and be heard. For those who believe in widespread participation and vigorous and open debate, the news from either front is not good.

It would be a mistake to think that the arc of American history has been toward greater participation and freer speech. If there is a pattern, it is that at certain moments large numbers enter the political arena — think white manhood suffrage in the early 19th century’, the 15th Amendment, giving African-American men the vote in 1870  the 19th Amendment, giving women the vote in 1920 — and then the ebb tide sets in with restrictions that erode the gains.


Jay Gould. Courtesy of Library of Congress

Free speech has won great victories, but the ability to be heard in forums that matter has not seen similar advances. Citizens United claims to enlarge the boundaries of political speech. But its political impact has been to hand a sound system to a select few — while the rest of us are entitled to whisper.

The comparison of the early 21st century to the Gilded Age of the late 19th century has become a cliché — but clichés gain traction because they contain an element of truth.

Citizens United does bring to mind a moment in the late 1880s and early 1890s when U.S. politics changed. The change did not involve the sudden intervention of money into politics, but rather how money entered politics and how it became speech.

The easiest way to think about this is that in the 1890s what had been retail politics — local and face to face — became wholesale politics: centralized informational campaigns of brochures, standardized newspaper stories and uniform messages. Historians have characterized the switch as one from the so-called “army campaigns” of marches, rallies, picnics and demonstrations to the “educational campaigns” that depended on a literate electorate and pervasive print media.

Gilded Age politics was always corrupt. Before the 1890s, however, it was retail corruption. Corporations solicited “friends” among those already in office — the preferred means were favors and the sharing of financial information. When necessary — and it often was — they offered bribes.

Influencing elections was far more difficult. Before the direct election of senators, the politics of friendship and bribery worked only in persuading legislatures to choose U.S. senators who would serve corporate interests. Senator John Mitchell of Oregon, for example, proclaimed of Ben Holladay, the railroad tycoon, “Ben Holladay’s politics are my politics and what Ben Holladay wants I want.”


J.P. Morgan. Courtesy of Library of Congress

Most corporate friends tried to be more circumspect. But when — through the pairing of vanity and bad judgment — plutocrats like Leland Stanford of the Southern Pacific Railroad and William A. Clark, a notorious “copper king” of Montana, bought their own election as senators, the confusion of interests was harder to disguise.

The move to “educational” campaigns and the growing strength of national parties, which were far more than coalitions of state and local organizations, created new demands for money.

The money was chump change by today’s standards, but it was enough to require large donors. It represented a new form of corruption — quid pro quo.  But it substituted favors to a political party for favors to a specific politician.

Henry Adams, the grandson and great-grandson of presidents and author of the early 20th-century’s best-selling and most erudite memoir, was cynical and disengaged about politics – though well informed. He recognized the new relationship of the Gilded Age rich and politicians.

After the 1892 defeat of the Republican Benjamin Harrison by Grover Cleveland, Adams wondered why GOP money hadn’t been able to win out. He asked his friend John Hay, a well-connected Republican who had served as Abraham Lincoln’s private secretary and would later be Theodore Roosevelt’s secretary of state, what had happened to “McKinley money” — the money that Republican manufacturers reaped from the McKinley Tariff.

“Is it possible,” Adams wrote, “…that our Republican manufacturers, after pocketing the swag, refused to disgorge? If so, they’ll catch it.”


Henry Adams, 1883. Photo by Marian Hooper Adams. Courtesy of Massachusetts Historical Society.

The spoils that Adams referred to were not to supply  simple bribes. Instead, he was saying, the plutocrats should have used their wealth to fund Harrison’s presidential campaign. It would, in the language of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote for the majority in Citizens United, be laundered into speech.

At the turn of the 20th century, such money routinely came from robber barons.  Getting those who benefited from government policies to “disgorge” became central to 20th-century politics — and limiting their ability to control the political process became central to the 20th-century reforms.

Since then, corporations — artificial persons — unions, political action committees and other organizations have both directly and indirectly replaced individual people as the leading sources of political funds.

In granting free speech rights to these artificial persons, the Supreme Court, in Citizens United, tossed out most of a half-century of election reform. More has followed.

Such developments make Adams sound both prescient and antique. Prescient because he understood the connection among money, “education,” or speech, and the financial benefits that flowed to those who financed and controlled speech. Adams is antique, though, because he thought that it was the political parties that were ultimately in control.

We have moved beyond that. For the time being, corporations and the rich who create Super PACs still cannot do without parties. But the time may come when Charles and David Koch’s Americans for Prosperity can vet candidates on its own and use unlimited funds to “educate” the public to their virtues — all in the name of free speech.

Whatever else corporations are, they are not yet citizens — though, I am sure, in some fertile legal imagination this is a possible step. It may be an unnecessary step since it has been the perverse genius of the Roberts Court to facilitate corporate participation in politics while diminishing the role of living, breathing citizens.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

If corporations are not persons and should not have free speech rights then why do they need to pay taxes? You cannot have it both ways.

Posted by RichmondRob | Report as abusive

Third Try: If corporations are not persons and do not have the rights of free speech then why do they need to pay taxes?

Posted by RichmondRob | Report as abusive

Richmond rob

Corporations need to pay taxes because it is not stated that to pay taxes an entity need be a person.

Posted by Flash1022 | Report as abusive


Taxes are neither based on free speech, nor being a person.

Taxes are only based on a revenue production and wealth entities.

Posted by Flash1022 | Report as abusive

why do they pay taxes?

Duh… like maybe corporations benefit from our country’s
Military protection
Natural Resources
Capital markets
Banking system
Legal system

Oh – maybe that’s the key – people are citizens but corporations are people but not citizens. If they can’t serve in the military – they shouldn’t have free speech protections.

Posted by michaelryan | Report as abusive

RichmondRob, I don’t care whether we tax corporations or not as long as the rich pay their fair share. The fact that Warren Buffett and Mitt Romney pay a significantly lower percentage of their income in taxes than I do suggests to me that the rich aren’t paying their fair share.

Posted by daveyjoe | Report as abusive

Taxes don’t kill people; People kill people.

Eye think that the point of the article is that the Republicans have been using US tax dollars, through corporate interests, to provoke war to make money that creates many inequalities (this means you) in Our World today … to oppress and provoke “national interest” wars around Our World (with great suffering) further, with your tax dollars … and have been doing this for a very long time.

Our World is deathly ill from the Republican pathology of murder; And The American People continue to finance it in accordance to the law.

Perhaps it is Time to modernize the “US” Constitution to give the power back to the People for The Sake of Life Eternal.

Peace be with you All.


Posted by Lovetwo | Report as abusive

This article is included in the opinion section by Reuters because it is one person’s biased and vilifying opinion. I would expect a far better analysis from Reuters, rather than bigoted attacks reflected in this article.

Posted by ArribaJuarez | Report as abusive

This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I ave joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!

Posted by flavored balsamic | Report as abusive

Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Much thanks again.

Posted by domain name sales | Report as abusive

It is hard to locate knowledgeable men and women within this subject, even so you be understood as guess what takes place you are discussing! Thanks

Posted by go to the site | Report as abusive

Im grateful for the blog article.Really thank you! Will read on

Posted by healthyforlife.pw | Report as abusive

Please let me know if you are looking for a article writer for your blog. You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I ad love to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an email if interested. Cheers!

Posted by myanmar real estate | Report as abusive

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So good to find someone with some original ideas on this subject. realy thanks for beginning this up. this web site is one thing that as wanted on the web, somebody with a little originality. helpful job for bringing one thing new to the web!

Posted by quotes on wisdom | Report as abusive

Simply desire to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is just great and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

Posted by vitamin b12 | Report as abusive

This excellent website certainly has all the info I wanted concerning this subject and didn at know who to ask.

Posted by film streaming | Report as abusive

I value the post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

Posted by caterers columbia sc | Report as abusive


Posted by Katie Bambrick beauty channel | Report as abusive

Just Browsing While I was surfing today I saw a great article concerning

Posted by hardstyle music | Report as abusive

WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. a€¦

Posted by Cecil Raw | Report as abusive

Im thankful for the article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

Posted by collision repair waltham | Report as abusive

ugg australia au

Posted by White Paper Syndication | Report as abusive

Just desire to say your article is as surprising. The clarity in your post is just excellent and i could assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

Posted by Discount Patches | Report as abusive

Im thankful for the post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

Posted by degree in communications | Report as abusive

I value the blog post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

Posted by PS3 Jailbreak | Report as abusive

Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

Posted by lowest mortgage rates | Report as abusive

Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is excellent, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about YESWAVE.TV В» Archive В» The Gour Hound .

Posted by camping near chicago | Report as abusive

Whats up are using WordPress for your blog platform? I am new to the blog world but I am trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any html coding expertise to make your own blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

Posted by www.reparaciondecalderas.es | Report as abusive

Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

Posted by apertura cajas fuertes burgos | Report as abusive

Pretty good article.

Posted by cerrajerosalbacete.net | Report as abusive

Major thankies for the article.Much thanks again. Great.

Posted by cerrajeros donosti | Report as abusive

Thank you, I ave recently been looking for information approximately this subject for ages and yours is the best I have came upon so far. However, what concerning the bottom line? Are you positive concerning the supply?

Posted by Empresas Cerrajeros Valladolid | Report as abusive

Thanks a lot for sharing this with all of us you really know what you are talking about! Bookmarked. Kindly also visit my web site =). We could have a link exchange arrangement between us!

Posted by Windows Mobile | Report as abusive

Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

Posted by Ecommerce Systems | Report as abusive

I value the article post. Awesome.

Posted by Hair Fall Solution | Report as abusive

Thanks again for the post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

Posted by rental mobil murah di surabaya | Report as abusive

Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

Posted by mspy reviews | Report as abusive

I loved your post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

Posted by lesbian sex | Report as abusive