‘Yemen has a lot of bad actors': Iran and Saudi Arabia face lesson on limits of power

May 13, 2015
Anti-Houthi fighters of the Southern Popular Resistance stand on a tank in Yemen's southern port city of Aden

Anti-Houthi fighters of the Southern Popular Resistance stand on a tank in Yemen’s southern port city of Aden, May 10, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer

So far, neither Saudi Arab nor Iran has been able to dictate Yemen’s future. For Riyadh and Tehran, the painfully complex conflict may become a teachable moment about the limits of power.

After weeks of air strikes and artillery bombardments by the Saudi Arabian-led coalition, the Houthi rebellion has been halted but not destroyed. Tehran – likely the Houthis’ biggest cheerleader — is limited in what it can or even might want to do by a tyranny of distance.

The situation in the small Arabian country will “probably end up being a stalemate,” said Rick Nelson, a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. With “so many things stacked against Yemen,” the political turmoil is an almost “unsolvable situation,” he added.

The Yemen that exists today only came into being 25 years ago. More important, the nation was born out of a long-running civil war that had split the country into northern and southern factions. After World War One, North Yemen gained its independence when the Ottoman Empire collapsed. Nearly a half century later, South Yemen became a fully sovereign state after a separate, bloody insurgency against British authorities.

With such chronic instability along its southern border, Riyadh had serious concerns about the stability of any regime in Sana’a well before the current crisis. Saudi kings have routinely picked sides and supported various factions in Yemen’s succession of civil conflicts.

Yemen is Saudi Arabia’s “wild frontier,” explained Ellen Laipson, president of the Stimson Center and director of its Middle East/Southwest Asia program. After decades of interventions, the small nation is practically an “existential issue” for Saudi authorities.

So Riyadh’s decision to use military force to try to stabilize the current situation, in which the Shi’ite Houthis took over Yemen’s capital, throwing out a Sunni-led government, is hardly surprising. And the Saudi coalition’s fighter-bombers, artillery and warships have largely halted Houthi advances.

But the Saudis and their regional partners in the Gulf Cooperation Council have had trouble articulating their long-term objectives. In April, the kingdom renamed its mission from Operation Decisive Storm to Operation Renewal of Hope, and attempted to outline a comprehensive plan for resolving the conflict.

While internationally recognized President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, currently in exile in Saudi Arabia, has welcomed Riyadh’s proposals, other factions have been more cautious in their responses or outright rejected the offers. Violence also continues largely unabated in various hot spots across the country regardless of any of these negotiations.

The Saudi-led onslaught has drawn criticism from the international community, too. On April 18, Oxfam, a respected nongovernmental organization, reported that Saudi bombs had leveled one of its warehouses full of humanitarian aid. And while the kingdom has tried to engage the media through official spokespersons, Riyadh has done its best to limit access to the conflict zones.

“The Saudi-led coalition has succeeded in placing Yemen under a virtual air and sea blockade,” Adam Baron, a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said, “putting Yemen in a virtual stranglehold.”

In turn, Iran has waged a propaganda campaign against the intervention without having to exert much effort. Predominantly Shi’ite Iranians share a certain common ground with the nominally Shi’ite Houthis.

But so far, Tehran has been unable to do much beyond talk. A flotilla of ships possibly loaded with arms for Houthi fighters turned away in the face of American warships. Saudi jets bombed a runway at the main airport in Sana’a to prevent a Mahan Air — an Iranian airline — plane full of aid from touching down.

“I think what we’re seeing is Iran shift to using propaganda rather than actual weaponry,” Baron said, but “so far there is no clear evidence that they’re getting through the Saudi blockade.”

Still, after years supporting groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine, Iran is “savvy at running militant organizations,” Nelson said. “The Iranians are definitely going to take advantage of this.”

And while Iran’s air force and navy cannot challenge Riyadh or its allies, Tehran has far less to lose, whatever happens. Distant from the conflict, Iranian authorities can decide how much or how little they want to engage in the conflict from a position of relative comfort.

Nelson, Laipson and Baron all agree that the Saudis have much more at stake. Riyadh has real security concerns to tackle in its backyard and needs to prove its mettle to its Gulf Cooperation Council partners and other allies. “Ultimately, I think Saudi Arabia is far more concerned about Yemen than the Iranians are,” Baron said.

Laipson goes one step further and argues that the media have often and unrealistically exaggerated the Houthis’ links to Iran. The group’s members are mostly Zaidis, a sect that broke away from the main Shi’ite branch of Islam more than a millennia ago, she pointed out. Devout Shi’ite Muslims might not necessarily rush to accept them as their brethren.

As a result, the Houthis, named for the individual who founded the movement, likely have grievances with previous Sunni regimes that are rooted in more than simple differences in religion, Laipson said. The Houthis are only one of the country’s myriad armed factions, too. Former President Ali Abdullah Saleh, a Sunni, has aligned himself with the Zaidi camp, but probably did so out of cynical self-interest rather than solidarity.

“Yemen has a lot of bad actors,” Lapison said. “[You] can’t fit this into the sectarian basket.”

So with all these factors at play, it seems unlikely that increased support from either Saudi Arabia or Iran will tip the scales in Yemen any time soon. If nothing else, the situation is “a reflection of how these crises can unfold,” Nelson said.

Yemen’s latest turmoil is still far from over, too. On May 10, Houthi fighters accepted a Saudi-proposed five-day ceasefire. However, the deal merely pauses the shooting so humanitarian groups can distribute badly needed aid to civilians caught in the crossfire.

But even if a lasting peace remains elusive, Saudi Arabia’s latest Yemeni adventure could have some positive outcomes for the region. Riyadh’s move to rally regional allies to intervene shows that it’s serious about handling regional security concerns, Laipson noted. And even if the mission ultimately fails, the kingdom and its friends will no doubt learn a valuable lesson about what military strength can and cannot achieve, she said.

11 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Yemen has a lot of bad actors, and the more we can get Saudi Arabia and Iran entangled in their mess (while we leave the area)…. the better. This is great.

Posted by AlkalineState | Report as abusive

maybe S.A./Iran will learn the limits of military power, ORRRRR maybe the americans/westerners will be educated on how to win a war of this sort.

I think S.A. will win here, they have wisely avoided sending 200k troops like US sent into iraq, successfully blockaded iran from getting in. the saudies are actually pretty safe in Riyadh, the houtis will run out of supplies and support, melt away and some will-reconcile with the lure of money and some will die out.

its possible that i am wrong, its also possible that SA will show the usa just about how much less was required to win how much more, and in doing so show the incompetence of Bush/Obama.

Posted by yobro_yobro88 | Report as abusive

Saudi Arabia is a terror sponsor. The princes should be assassinated.

Posted by AlkalineState | Report as abusive

hah, AlkalineState i thought you was into staying out of the mideast, now assassinate the saudis.

its a bit too see the Obama ppl. chances are you have arrived where you are, i.e. the saudi bashing, out of desperation for protecting iran and obama’s deal.

For me personally i would love to see Iran go nuclear (which in itself is bad) but i’d love to see the follow-up Obama humiliation and the domestic violence among DEMs which would far out-benefit iran’s nuclear breakout.

Posted by yobro_yobro88 | Report as abusive

Iran is not trying to control Yemen. But, the amateur new leaders of Saudi Arabia are making absolute fools of themselves with their idiotic attack on Yemen. They have no idea what they are doing and they have no clear goal or strategy. They just bomb everything in sight. It is utterly idiotic and Obama just stands around and applauds the destruction and wanton killing of innocents people. Actually, he adds more fuel to the fire by providing more weapons to the stupid Saudis. It is really amazing.

Posted by Logical123 | Report as abusive

If the people and the politicians stop chewing KUAT maybe a solution will become more apparent to all.

Posted by Nazarean | Report as abusive

Yobro, who cares if Iran goes nuclear? Pakistan is nuclear now, and that’s the craziest planet on earth. Has the sky fallen?

Posted by AlkalineState | Report as abusive

This article is really badly informed.

Zaydi’s are a kind of Shiites. They ruled most of Yemen for more than a thousand years until 1962. They constitute 35 to 40% of Yemen’s population and Saleh is one of them. Most of the Houthi’s – a political movement – are Zaydi too, but some are Sunni.

Hadi is a Sunni who was more or less imposed on Yemen by the Gulf countries after the Arab Spring protests. His selection was sealed with “elections” that he won with North Korean figures – being the only candidate.

Yemen has a long tradition of local uprisings. But the main reason for the Houthi’s now is the rise of Al Qaeda and its hate propaganda against the Zaydi’s. Al Qaeda and the Wahabi ideology are massively subsidized by Saudi Arabia and Hadi gave them freedom to operate.

Posted by musicmouse | Report as abusive

I know Reuters will not publish this because I tried posting these very words before and they were blocked.

Iran will win in the end.
And Iran will dominate the region.

Posted by No_apartheid | Report as abusive

“Iran will win in the end. And Iran will dominate the region.”

Good. Show me an Al Qaeda cell or ISIS brigade in Iran. They don’t have any. You know why? Because Iran kills them. Saudi Arabia funds ISIS. Iran kills ISIS. Iran is the only guy cleaning house over there.

Posted by AlkalineState | Report as abusive

What is surprising of this article that there is no mention of limits of American power in this whole Middle east scenario. Western propaganda?

Posted by cynical175 | Report as abusive