Comments on: For America, real progress achieved nearly by accident http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: LetBalanceCome http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1077027 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:20:14 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1077027 This is the neo facist Amerika- if you don’t believe as they do, your opinion and beliefs are labeled.

They are the utmost hypocrites- they speak tolerance from one side of their mouth and bitter hatred for those they do not agree with.

You all can rub your like genitals together all you want but you will NEVER have your OWN kids- you will be using someone else’s DNA.

]]>
By: UauS http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1075075 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 21:15:24 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1075075 In regards to marriage, I belive there’s a mess in general. While I fully empathetic with homosexual love, I do not support homosexual marriage. For, as given us by the Nature, love is not necessarily about marriage, but marriage is essentially about posterity, which implies different sexes not only to reproduce, but also to give posterity unconditionally different traits and skills.

]]>
By: pyradius http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1074992 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:26:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1074992 “Everything under the sun a right…”

Nah, just start with equal protection of the existing rights of everyone else. Nothing new whatsoever, merely an affirmation to the inclusion of all Americans who want to commit to someone else.

It is pretty amusing (in that looking down at you kind of amusing) that you suddenly become concerned with expanding rights vs. restricting rights. Apparently restricting the rights of others is what ‘freedom’ means to you…

]]>
By: Calvin2k http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1074877 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:57:06 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1074877 @Labrador1 But the Right Wing always claims America is all about freedom. What’s the matter, don’t you believe in freedom?

]]>
By: Hulls http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1074677 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:36:28 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1074677 @Labrador1 When did following the Constitution become a partisan issue? Maybe you siding are with Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-La.), who called the decision an “all-out assault against the religious freedom rights of Christians”.

Broaden your perspectives, the Constitution doesn’t mention God a single time.

]]>
By: Labrador1 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/06/30/for-america-real-progress-achieved-nearly-by-accident/#comment-1074675 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:30:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=41720#comment-1074675 Oh, so if we make everything under the sun a right and give you liberals everything you want, then America is a good place? I would suggest that you broaden your perspective.

]]>