Comments on: Why the Hillary Clinton email imbroglio isn’t just politics http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/20/why-the-hillary-clinton-email-imbroglio-isnt-just-politics/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Mainer1776 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/20/why-the-hillary-clinton-email-imbroglio-isnt-just-politics/#comment-1101252 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 19:35:32 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=42910#comment-1101252 How does the author know that this isn’t worse than Watergate?

]]>
By: Empress_Trudy http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/20/why-the-hillary-clinton-email-imbroglio-isnt-just-politics/#comment-1099198 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:50:34 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=42910#comment-1099198 I hope that the DNC and Obama simply abolish federal elections and let him keep the crown for life.

]]>
By: schmidtyfi http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/20/why-the-hillary-clinton-email-imbroglio-isnt-just-politics/#comment-1099193 Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:59:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=42910#comment-1099193 “Let’s be clear up front: We are not by any stretch talking Watergate here”

Are you kidding?

This is much more serious than Watergate. Watergate was a burglary by political operatives against political operatives.

This is our Secretary of State compromising highly sensitive material! The details are just dripping out, despite her best efforts to obfuscate and delay, which itself is a scandal.

But, for example, we know at least one email was related to the security situation in Benghazi. What if that information was compromised and used to help plot/plan the attack on the embassy? Is that really that far fetched, or simply common sense?

And, why did she even use this system in the first place? To keep secrets from the American public. That, too, is scandalous.

]]>
By: Telstar http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/20/why-the-hillary-clinton-email-imbroglio-isnt-just-politics/#comment-1099098 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:13:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=42910#comment-1099098 This opinion article is very unconvincing, rambling all over the map. No discussion is made of what written protocols were in place over this time frame for emails. What instructions were given specifically to the Secretary of State about emails, how confidential emails are marked and handled, etc.

I think this is much ado about nothing big time.

]]>