Comments on: Why ‘sincere’ isn’t a real qualification for office http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/12/why-sincere-isnt-a-real-qualification-for-office/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: akita96th http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/12/why-sincere-isnt-a-real-qualification-for-office/#comment-1110277 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:24:24 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=44137#comment-1110277 Well I dont see a GOP win in 2016..They have to many clowns….No one wants a moron for president.

]]>
By: Jason Fields http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/12/why-sincere-isnt-a-real-qualification-for-office/#comment-1110262 Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:47:47 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=44137#comment-1110262 This is actually an opinion article. I’m sorry for any confusion.

]]>
By: imronburgundy http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/12/why-sincere-isnt-a-real-qualification-for-office/#comment-1110203 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:05:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=44137#comment-1110203 Reuters needs to stop pushing these “blog” articles like they’re unbiased news pieces. This is nothing but Hillary-supporting rag.

]]>