How Western politicians are playing into Islamic State’s hands

November 19, 2015
A migrant from Syria carries his bicycle on railway near the Greek border in Macedonia  June 17, 2015.  Hungary announced plans on Wednesday to build a four-metre-high fence along its border with Serbia to stem the flow of illegal migrants. Several thousand migrants are daily crossing the Balkans towards Hungary on their way to other European Union countries. REUTERS/Ognen Teofilovski  - RTX1GZ3Y

A migrant from Syria carries his bicycle on railway near the Greek border in Macedonia June 17, 2015. REUTERS/Ognen Teofilovski –

In September, a photo of the lifeless body of toddler Aylan Kurdi face-down on a Turkish beach changed the way Europeans viewed the refugees arriving at their borders. Hostility turned to a sense of humanitarian duty.

Now another photo risks reversing that tone: that of a tattered (and possibly fake) Syrian passport. Issued in the name of “Ahmad Almohammad,” it was registered in early October at a refugee reception centre on the Greek island of Leros, some 70 kilometers by boat from Bodrum, Turkey, where Aylan’s body had been found. The passport then travelled to Serbia, where its holder applied for asylum. It was finally recovered near the remains of one of the suicide attackers responsible for the deaths of 129 people in Paris on Friday.

The passport was seized upon by many migrant-hostile politicians and commentators in Europe. Some Eastern European governments hinted they might pull out of a European Union deal to resettle Syrian refugees, while Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s National Front party, called for an “immediate halt” to immigration.

Surprisingly, the most vitriolic attack on refugees as would-be terrorists came not from Europe’s right-wing parties, but from prominent Republican politicians in the United States. Several Republican governors and presidential candidates called for a halt to the resettlement of Syrian refugees in the United States, in the name of national security. For House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the fact that the majority of Syrian refugees are “single men coming over, which is not women and children” seemed evidence enough that they must be up to no good.

Meanwhile, investigations have revealed that at least four of the seven attackers killed in Paris were French nationals, with strong links to Belgium. Two remain unidentified, while the nationality of the bomber whose body was found near the Syrian passport is unknown. He may be Syrian, but he may equally be one of the thousands of foreign fighters — French and Belgian citizens among them — who have travelled to Syria to join Islamic State.

Some will argue that it makes no difference whether the passport is fake, and what matters most is that a terrorist possibly used the  so-called “migrant trail” to enter EU territory. Hence, the existence of this route — and the people travelling it — is a threat to European security. But this argument ignores the fact that other Paris attackers managed to get from Europe to Syria and back without registering as refugees.

Indeed, the migrant trail makes little sense for someone intent on causing harm. Apart from the physical perils of navigating the Aegean Sea in a dinghy, a would-be terrorist would risk detection at the many border crossings on the journey through Europe.

Why, then, on such flimsy evidence and weak arguments, has the Syrian passport found at Stade de France caused a backlash against refugees? Recent history may give us the answer.

Fourteen years ago, responding to September 11 terror attacks, the then-British Home Secretary, David Blunkett, declared to the House of Commons: “We have a right to say that if people seek to abuse rights of asylum to be able to hide in this country and organise terrorist acts, we must take steps to deal with them.” Governments across the industrialised world clamoured to close down the “asylum loophole” in their already highly-restrictive immigration laws.

The clampdown on asylum after 9/11 had an even looser relationship to facts than the current conflation of Syrian refugees with members of Islamic State. None of the 19 hijackers who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks were asylum seekers or had refugee status. Fifteen were from Saudi Arabia, an ally of the United States in the Middle East. All had entered the country legally, although some had overstayed their visas.

The red herring of the “asylum loophole” after 9/11 reflected hostility towards asylum that predates the rise of al Qaeda and Islamic State. This hostility intensified when hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers began to arrive in Europe in the early 1990s. As the backlog of asylum decisions grew, lodging an asylum application became synonymous with receiving a long-term visa.

Fears abounded of “unmanageable” numbers arriving unannounced and threatening economic security and cultural identity.  September 11 functioned in that sense as an enabler: By labelling asylum seekers as potential terror threats, politicians could enact draconian measures to deter and detain them — measures that democratic societies would ordinarily shy away from, unless they were justified in the name of national security.

We are seeing a similar reaction today. The fear of terrorism is superimposed on other fears and prejudices: Fears of economic migrants taking jobs and straining the welfare state; fears of Muslim refugees undermining European culture and identity. But since these other fears are murky and vague, and have to compete with Europeans’ strong sense of humanitarian duty to give sanctuary to refugees, the fake Syrian passport is a godsend for those who want to stop the flood of Syrian refugees. Who can quarrel with national security? Who would dare guarantee that no refugee, ever, will perpetrate a terrorist act?

Such guarantees are of course impossible to give. But there is scant, if any, evidence that asylum seekers have arrived in their host country already intent on inflicting harm. A very small number of asylum seekers, or the children of asylum seekers, have become radicalised after arrival. (Although several of those people have made huge headlines, like one of the assailants at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, and the brothers behind the Boston Marathon bombing.) There is even less evidence of refugees arriving through resettlement programmes committing terrorist acts.

The collective punishment of Syrian refugees for the crimes of terrorists would play straight into the hands of Islamic State, whose stated aim is to create an “us versus them” animosity between westerners and Muslims, and fertilise the ground for disaffected European youths of immigrant background to be radicalised.

Instead, if we are to learn from both history and the Paris attacks, we should focus our efforts on streamlining and increasing quotas for the resettlement of Syrian refugees. It would help stabilise Syria’s neighbours, who are reeling under the weight of the refugee burden. And it would reduce the chaotic conditions of today’s migrant trail through Europe, which is to nobody’s benefit apart from organised criminals and corrupt police officers.

Helping refugees is a humanitarian duty. To do so well is also in Europe’s security interests.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of the article mistakenly referred to Representative Paul Ryan as a presidential candidate. He is currently speaker of the House of Representatives.

8 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

The problem with indiscriminate migrant lovies like yourself, so prominent in the media today, is that you pour scorn on legitimate concerns of others. Such concerns so readily trashed include: –

1. Safety concerns associated with opening borders without checks on migrants.
2. Implying that there are no risks or consequences from such a large flow of people.
3. That many of the migrants aren’t as suggested refugees seeking asylum.
4. That many seeking entry hold views opposed to our liberal values; freedom of speech, equality legislation and religious freedom to mention but a few.
5. Concerns for livelihood.

It is scandalous that you translate such concerns into a wish to punish genuine refugees. People have genuine concerns and to pretend otherwise and simultaneously piously dictating what our humanitarian duty is quite odious. Many of us have long been aware of hardship on the planet where the plight of individuals can be much worse than the migrants streaming into Europe. It hasn’t required a dead toddler for us to realise this.

Posted by Contrary | Report as abusive

Let the Muslim states take the refugees. They are all supposed to be brothers and required to help fellow Muslims in need.

Posted by nojuan | Report as abusive

What is terrifying to myself is conservatives are using collective punishment and fear instead of statesmanship, and that the populace is falling in line with that fear, causing the loss of world humanity.

Posted by Flash1022 | Report as abusive

Great article, but there’s one thing I noticed that I believe is inaccurate: Paul Ryan isn’t a presidential candidate at this time. He’s a former vice presidential candidate, but he isn’t currently in the race for the Republican Nomination.

Posted by salterst | Report as abusive

Paul Ryan isn’t a presidential candidate.

Posted by Limehouse | Report as abusive

I don’t believe Paul Ryan is a presidential candidate.
If you are going to ramble, get your facts strait.

Posted by Steve041060 | Report as abusive

The world’s media are definitely playing into ISIS hands by exhorting the continued importation of Islamic men of fighting age from a region known as a hotspot of salafism.

Hammerstad, as an expert in “humanitarian politics” makes no secret that all are welcome in western societies, jihadi or not.

Posted by GetReel | Report as abusive

seeing the splendid state of Aleppo and Sinjar and noting the recent addition of russian ordinance aimed at Syrian towns controlled by anyone but Assad brought back fond memories of the state of Grozny after the second Russian ‘investment’

good to see mr putin enjoying himself doing what he does best

miraculous to hear mr netanyahu state that israeli / russian relations are ‘good’

and best of all the sight of european politicians declaring ‘war’ and taking their place in the pantomime chorus

Posted by EdMartin | Report as abusive