Three ways China is finally taking its seat at the world’s table

December 23, 2015
China's President Xi Jinping speaks during the opening ceremony of the 2nd annual World Internet Conference in Wuzhen town of Jiaxing, Zhejiang province, China, December 16, 2015. REUTERS/Aly Song

Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks at the opening of the 2nd annual World Internet Conference in Wuzhen town of Jiaxing, China, December 16, 2015. REUTERS/Aly Song

Beijing was anxious to make a good impression at the recent World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, China. Attendees had luxurious accommodations in 19th-century townhouses along picturesque canals, an army of staffers catered to the delegates, who each received a free Chinese smartphone that, among others things, included software to open Facebook and Twitter. (Though both websites are banned in China.)

All the pomp was part of China’s continuing efforts to demonstrate that it is a sophisticated leader on international issues, a power worthy of respect.

China wants to play a more central role in influencing global governance. In spite of recent hiccups in its economy, it is beginning to feel and act like a great power. For the past decade, U.S. policymakers across administrations have urged China to be more proactive and join the “governing board” of the world. Their unstated hope was that, in return for this generous gesture, China would accept without change the international norms that the United States and Europe have established. That’s wishful thinking. Commensurate with its new power, China will most likely seek to amend global governance to fit its needs.

Participants attend the closing ceremony of the second annual World Internet Conference in Wuzhen town of Jiaxing, Zhejiang province, China, December 18, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. THIS PICTURE IS DISTRIBUTED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS. CHINA OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN CHINA.

Participants at the closing ceremony of the second annual World Internet Conference in Wuzhen town of Jiaxing, China, December 18, 2015. REUTERS/Stringer

This is all the more reason for Washington to keep talking to Beijing about all issues, including Internet freedom and cybersecurity, on which they likely will never agree.

The Wuzhen summit left no room for optimism. President Xi Jinping made clear that “freedom and order” on the Internet must go together, and foreign countries and companies should respect China’s “network sovereignty.” In other words, there will be no reprieve from censorship for the Chinese people, which Xi’s administration has stepped up substantially.

While Xi emphasized that China opposes all types of cyber crime, including cyber espionage for commercial gain, recent Chinese hacks into U.S. companies have been dramatic. Behind the scenes, U.S.-Chinese dialogues on the subject are showing only fitful progress.

Washington should not acquiesce to Chinese views on these points. It should instead address the disagreements through intense, confidential government-to-government diplomacy. The administration is more likely to make progress in private rather than through public grandstanding. Washington’s eyes are clearly wide open to the strong disagreements, yet it should welcome Beijing’s willingness to become a stakeholder in the international system with efforts like the Wuzhen summit.

Internet governance is not the only global issue on which China has recently stepped up to lead. After decades of being mostly quiet on the United Nations Security Council, Beijing recently made a stunning reversal. It almost tripled its contribution to the U.N. budget, increased Chinese peacekeepers by several thousand and committed several billion dollars in aid for the poorest countries to meet the U.N.’s sustainable development goals.

Part of the building of 'Unit 61398', a secretive Chinese military unit, is seen in the outskirts of Shanghai February 19, 2013. The unit is believed to be behind a series of hacking attacks, a U.S. computer security company said, prompting a strong denial by China and accusations that it was in fact the victim of U.S. hacking. REUTERS/Carlos Barria (CHINA - Tags: POLITICS SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY MILITARY)

Part of the building of ‘Unit 61398,’ a secretive Chinese military unit, in the outskirts of Shanghai. The unit is believed behind a series of hacking attacks. February 19, 2013. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

This trend at the United Nations is very much in the right direction even as China continues to act militarily in some ways Washington doesn’t like. On climate change, too, China made a dramatically positive move. The landmark U.S.-China agreement, signed in December 2014, led the way for 195 countries to submit individual plans to curb emissions in the recent Paris accord.

The Wuzhen summit reflects a similar desire by China to be seen as a leader on Internet governance. The West should cautiously welcome this.

The United States will continue to disagree vehemently with China on their domestic censorship efforts and their continued hacking into U.S. government and company systems.

Yet on Internet governance, there is some hope. For years, China and Russia strongly opposed the U.S.-led “multi-stakeholder” approach to Internet governance, which gives companies, nonprofits, individuals and governments all a voice in how one global Internet is managed. At times, both countries even threatened to split off into a patchwork of incompatible networks that would have made it far more difficult to transmit information or do electronic commerce around the world.

At Wuzhen, however, Xi sounded far closer to the Western approach than he has before. He contended that Internet governance should involve “multi-party participation . . . including governments, international organizations, Internet companies, technology companies, nongovernmental institutions and individual citizens.”

Behind the scenes, there are still substantial disagreements. Yet China’s recognition that companies, nongovernmental organizations and others should have a role in Internet governance shows its position may be gradually converging with that of the West.

Many foreign-policy analysts and journalists have been skeptical and dismissive of China’s proposals at Wuzhen. Some criticized U.S. technology firms for participating. They pointed out, gleefully, that senior Western government leaders were largely absent, though those in China’s neighborhood participated, including Pakistan, Russia and Central Asia. This criticism is shortsighted. Washington should certainly continue to press China and others on issues on which they disagree, including censorship and cyber theft.

The administration, however, should not assume that China will adopt its vision of the world unchanged. It is preferable to have China and other rising powers inside a larger tent — even if they often disagree — rather than on the outside creating an alternative order that Washington cannot influence.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

A “new order”. That is a Bush thing. The power mad always think in these terms. Never let humanity arise from the clutches of the paranoid power mad, life would be too good for the good, and the evil just can’t have that.

Posted by brotherkenny4 | Report as abusive

China uses a huge portion of the world’s resources, and needs to more to control the terrorism that responds to such imperialism.

Russia, EU, US are all working hard to deal with ISIS. What is China doing? What, they don’t use oil in China? I submit that China is a gigantic parasite on the world’s goods and services.

Posted by Solidar | Report as abusive

Cash is and always will be king. Chinese commies simply buying the West and the rest one by one, and Europe’s lining up already.
Karl Marx’s wildest dream comes true: welcome to your wonderful communist future folks!

Posted by UauS | Report as abusive

1 why does the writer advocate confidential negotiations?

we shouldn’t trust our own governments – even less the chinese

2 having given our industry away in order to bribe china into the us’s new world order – why should we expect anything other than contempt from the chinese government when we pretend to demand equality in negotiations?

Posted by EdMartin | Report as abusive

China takes, but does very little for the world. They are changing slowly. They did finally offer some help in ebola-stricken countries of Africa. They still lag far behind in contributions to the international monetary fund, world bank, medical charities and catastrophe logistics support. I worked a mudslide site in Guatemala. Met Haitians who managed to come and help, but no Chinese. Haitians!

Posted by Solidar | Report as abusive

China uses oil from the middle east, like everyone else.

China has 16 million empty homes (overbuilt on failed speculation).

China has offered to take ZERO Syrian refugees.

Posted by Solidar | Report as abusive