Comments on: North Korea is a nuclear power. Here’s why the world just has to live with it. http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/ Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:57:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Solidar http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1129158 Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:11:50 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1129158 Just poison him, like we did his old man.

]]>
By: Jingan http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128993 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:29:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128993 because we have nukes in South Korea so they balance power with their nukes, thats all, no need elaborate theories

]]>
By: mulp http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128972 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:17:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128972 Why move any US nuke anywhere from where they are?

Simply publish the US nuke targetting of North Korea in response any use of nuclear weapons against the US or US military. The first wave of retaliatory strikes are presumably a hundred warheads hitting North Korean military forces, the seat of power, and industry vital to war.

North Korea seems to be headed toward suicide just to inflict a pinprick of harm to the US.

Nukes were understood to be useless for tactical reasons in mountainous Korea, but they can definitely wipe out 80% of what is required for civilization by destroying cities and industry built over centuries in just a few hours.

]]>
By: MoozeTraks http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128963 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:23:21 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128963 The situation on the Korean peninsula is unstable. In what fairy-tale world does adding nuclear missiles to an unstable situation create stability? The same missiles could be targeted at North Korea or at China. Considering our reaction to Russian missiles in Cuba, what does Ramberg think China’s reaction will be? Ramberg is just another Dr. Strangelove-esque character who missed the closing scene of his own satirical depiction.

]]>
By: Benny27 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128962 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:58:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128962 Yeah, washington is real committed to nuclear non proliferation, that is unless you are an ally like israel or pakistan. In fact the only instances of proliferation worldwide have been encouraged by the USA. congrats on the bovine scat by an author with zero credibility, coming as he does right out of the same gang that brought us the very proliferation I refer to.

]]>
By: juhlman http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128958 Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:56:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128958 Ramberg, what do you think nuclear submarines are for?

]]>
By: Solidar http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2016/03/10/it-may-be-time-to-return-u-s-nukes-to-the-korean-peninsula/#comment-1128936 Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:07:42 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=46904#comment-1128936 Nope. It is not time to bring U.S. nukes to any place. Better to hack the North Korean systems. If we can not do that, then just shut down the CIA right now and send them all home to their mommies. CIA hasn’t done anything good or useful in 50 years. And I’m not sure they even did 50 years ago.

These are the people who dropped the ball on 9/11, then brought us the brilliant WMD reports out of Iraq.

Prove your worth in North Korea. Or lose all funding. Your Choice.

]]>