Empty American promises and the lives they can cost

March 25, 2016
Stacks of unidentified corpses line the walls of an underground shelter at a Bosnian morgue in Tuzla March 28, 1997. The body bags contain victims found in mass graves and in wooded areas after the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. REUTERS

Stacks of unidentified corpses line the walls of an underground shelter at a Bosnian morgue in Tuzla March 28, 1997. The body bags contain victims found in mass graves and in wooded areas after the 1995 Srebrenica massacre. REUTERS

On Thursday, a 65-year-old man with a name that Americans struggle to pronounce was convicted of committing genocide 20 years ago in Bosnia. With bombs exploding in Brussels and a vituperative U.S. presidential campaign in full force, the court ruling might seems obscure.

But the story of Radovan Karadzic, a psychiatrist turned genocidal mini-state leader, provides lessons for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The moral of Karadzic’s story is simple for current and future American presidents: beware the empty threat.

Karadzic, with his long mane of hair and hawkish nose, was the public face and political leader of a hardline group of Bosnian Serbs following the collapse of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. When I covered him during the final year of the war in Bosnia, he was known for his ability to evade questions.

When a shell landed in the middle of a teeming market in Sarajevo, killing scores of Bosnian Muslims, Karadzic insisted that the Bosnian Muslims had fired it themselves to garner sympathy. When Bosnian Serb snipers fired on unarmed women and children, he denied it as well.

“Children were sniped at while playing in front of their houses, walking with their parents or walking home from school,” Judge O-Gon Kwon said on Thursday, while reading the verdict of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia against Karadzic.

The strange thing about covering Karadzic during the war was seeing him change. With each empty declaration from President Bill Clinton that Karadzic would be held accountable, the Bosnian Serbs seemed to grow more confident and defiant.

Over the course of the war, the Bosnian Serbs “ethnically cleansed” – or expelled – hundreds of thousands of Muslims from their territory. They took UN peacekeepers hostage. And in July 1995, they took the town of Srebrenica and executed every Bosnian Muslim man and boy they captured. All told, 8,000 perished.

Clinton’s unfulfilled threats, it seemed to me and other reporters at the time, had emboldened Karadzic and the mini-state’s military leader, General Ratko Mladic. And Srebrenica itself was, tragically, the physical embodiment of false promise.

With the support of the United States and its European allies, the United Nations had declared Srebrenica a “Safe Area” and stripped its Bosnian Muslims defenders of artillery and heavy weapons. But instead of posting several thousand, heavily armed UN peacekeepers to protect the town, several hundred Canadian and then Dutch peacekeepers arrived with white vehicles, blue helmets and a few machine guns.

When the Serbs attacked, Dutch defenses quickly collapsed and promised NATO air strikes never arrived. Karadzic and Mladic were left to do as they pleased.

“The accused was the sole person within the RS [Bosnian Serb government] with the power to intervene to prevent the Bosnian Muslim males from being killed,” Judge Kwon said as he declared Karadzic guilty of genocide in Srebrenica.

Twenty years after the mass killings, threats from current and future U.S. presidents seem to be equally unpersuasive. In a recent profile in the Atlantic, Obama boasted about the fact that he had not carried out his vow to bomb the forces of Bashar al-Assad if the Syrian leader used chemical weapons against his own people.

“I’m very proud,” Obama told the magazine.

Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, is promising American voters that she will unleash a merciless, multi-year onslaught against ISIS — without deploying large numbers of American ground troops.

“We are in it for the long haul and we will stand taller and stronger than they could possibly imagine,” Clinton vowed in a campaign speech in December.

And Donald Trump is threatening everyone. He vows to place tariffs on every good sold from China – as well as air conditioners that U.S. company Carrier manufactures in Mexico.

“We’re going to tax you,” Trump vowed in a presidential debate last month. “So stay where you are [in Mexico] or build in the United States.”

The lesson for U.S. presidents is that threats can come back to haunt. Clinton responded far more quickly to Serb attacks in Kosovo in 1999, but has said that Srebrenica was one of the greatest regrets of his presidency. It is a distant second with the genocide in Rwanda, where as many as one million perished after the UN failed to protect civilians there.

In hindsight, it is arguably better for American leaders to say nothing when they have no intention of taking actionIssuing hollow threats emboldens extremists. It does not cow them.

And most tragically, as the survivors of Srebrenica found out, empty threats from a U.S. president also victimize the innocent people who believe them. Today, thousands of women from Srebrenica are growing up without fathers, brothers and sons. Their crime? Believing the word of an American president.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

According to the article’s author, the Serbs have no guilt in this. The headline leads directly to the article’s end statement. It is always someone else’s fault.

Posted by SixthRomeo | Report as abusive

“…the court ruling might seemS obscure.”- PULITZER

Posted by voelker1 | Report as abusive

“Issuing hollow threats emboldens extremists. It does not cow them.” – good point. Fast forward from Srebrenica to Syria and Ukraine…

Posted by UauS | Report as abusive

Some readers seem to forget the title of the article. It’s not “Serbs are at fault”. It’s about threats and promises our leaders make and then never follow through. They lie and as a result are as guilty as the perpetators.

Posted by ofilha | Report as abusive

By this reasoning, the US is also guilty of the murder of 6 million Jews in Europe and the Rwandan genocide.
To think that the murderers would have held back if we had just kept our mouths shut is absurd.
Flawed logic by David Rohde

Posted by NJNative | Report as abusive

I believe that your logic is flawed, not of the author. For there’s a big difference if your wife says Yes at your wedding time, or just keeps her mouth shut.

Posted by UauS | Report as abusive

Just think if Kennedy had been a coward when the Russos put nukes in Cuba.

Thanks to Obama for IS having a state.

Posted by ManInTheMirror | Report as abusive

All these because of craze to prove America is a leader! America is already the leader and need not prove using tools of economics or weapons.No one match technology and local resources developments of America.Why unnecessarily to have the blame of double standards.Why we care for democracy in other countries.Let’s live comfortably saving our money for others and let live others they want to live by themselves.No country can develop without the help of America..Let them come to us instead of going to them.Trump is right.It costs money to us.

Posted by gentalman | Report as abusive


” It’s about threats and promises our leaders make and then never follow through. They lie and as a result are as guilty as the perpetators.”

Does this mean then that the COMPLETE SILENCE on the part of Euro’s to actually handle their own regional problems is “completely OK”?

It IS time for USA to back off from NATO – we bear far too large a share of the funding – let Europe FINALLY do something to protect Europe.

Posted by klapa | Report as abusive

You mean Obama can’t end ethnic cleansing and climate change by giving just the right speech? Isn’t that what is Nobel was for?

Posted by TheyCallMeBruce | Report as abusive

If the threat from Obama was so empty, why did Assad get rid of his chemical weapons? Because he’s such a nice sensible guy?

Posted by distancematters | Report as abusive

I am amazed that a pulitzer prize winner could deliver an article that treats such a complicated issue so simplistically. Writer’s block at deadline? The article is an empty promise.

Posted by justlikeu | Report as abusive