The Great Debate

Jun 26, 2009 07:48 EDT
Reese Erlich

It’s not a Twitter revolution in Iran

Photo

– Reese Erlich is a freelance foreign correspondent who covered the Iranian elections and is author of The Iran Agenda: the Real Story of U.S. Policy and the Middle East Crisis (Polipoint Press) The views expressed are his own. —

Iran is not undergoing a Twitter Revolution. The term simultaneously mischaracterizes and trivializes the important mass movement developing in Iran.

Here’s how it all began. The Iranian government prohibited foreign reporters from traveling outside Tehran without special permission, and later confined them to their hotel rooms and offices. CNN and other cable networks were particularly desperate to find ways to show the large demonstrations and government repression. So they turned to Internet sites such as Facebook and Twitter in a frantic effort to get information. Since reporters were getting most of their information from Tweets and You Tube video clips, the notion of a “Twitter Revolution” was born.

We reporters love a catch phrase and, Twitter being all a flutter in the west, it seemed to fit. It’s a catchy phrase but highly misleading.

COMMENT

To the best of my knowledge, nobody has proved that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did not receive a solid majority (although possibly it does not amount to 63%). If this is the case, then Mr. Mousavi’s demand to annul the results of the elections is hardly democratic and certainly illegal.

Posted by aleksey | Report as abusive
The Great Debate BLOG