Opinion

Hugo Dixon

Confidence tricks for the euro zone

By Hugo Dixon
July 23, 2012

The euro crisis is to a great extent a confidence crisis. Sure, there are big underlying problems such as excessive debt and lack of competitiveness in the peripheral economies. But these can be addressed and, to some extent, this is happening already. Meanwhile, a quick fix for the confidence crisis is needed.

The harsh medicine of reform is required but is undermining confidence on multiple levels. Businesses, bankers, ordinary citizens and politicians are losing faith in both the immediate economic future and the whole single-currency project. That is creating interconnected vicious spirals.

The twin epicentres of the crisis are Spain and Italy. The boost they received from last month’s euro zone summit has been more than wiped out. Spanish 10-year bond yields equalled their euro-era record of 7.3 percent on July 20; Italy’s had also rebounded to a slightly less terrifying but still worrying 6.2 percent.

As ever, the explanation is that the summiteers came up with only a partial solution and even that was hedged with caveats. Although the euro zone will probably inject capital into Spain’s bust banks, relieving Madrid of the cost of doing so, the path will be tortuous. Meanwhile, a scheme which could help Italy finance its debt will come with strings attached – and there still isn’t enough money in the euro zone’s bailout fund to do this for more than a short time.

The two countries’ high bond yields aren’t just a thermometer of how sick they are. They push up the cost of capital for everybody in Spain and Italy, while sowing doubts about whether the whole show can be kept on the road. Capital flight continues at an alarming rate, especially in Spain. The so-called Target 2 imbalances, which measure the credits and debits of national central banks within the euro zone, are a good proxy for this. Spain’s Target 2 debt had grown to 408 billion euros at the end of June, up from 303 billion only two months earlier. The Italian one was roughly stable but still high at 272 billion euros.

The loss of confidence is harming the economy. Spain’s GDP is expected to shrink by 2.1 percent this year and a further 3.1 percent next year, according to Citigroup, one of the more pessimistic forecasters. The prospects for Italy are not much better: a predicted 2.6 percent decline this year followed by 2 percent next year.

Shrinking economies are, in turn, pushing up debt/GDP ratios. Citigroup expects Spain’s to jump from 69 percent at the end of last year to 101 percent at the end of 2013, in part because of the cost of bailing out its banks, while Italy’s will shoot up from 120 percent to 135 percent. These eye-popping numbers then reinforce anxiety in the markets.

All of this is having a corrosive effect on the political landscape. In Italy, the situation is especially precarious as Mario Monti, the technocratic prime minister, has repeatedly said he will resign after next spring’s elections. The centre-left Democratic Party, which is leading in the opinion polls, is still committed to the euro. But the second and third most popular political groups – the Five Star movement led by comedian Beppe Grillo, and Silvio Berlusconi’s PdL – are either outright eurosceptics or toying with becoming so.

The situation is slightly better in Spain because Mariano Rajoy has a solid majority and doesn’t officially have to face the electorate for three and a half years. But hundreds of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets last week to protest against the latest austerity measures. Pundits are starting to speculate that Rajoy may not last his full term. And if the Italian and Spanish governments can’t carry their people with them along the reform path, the fear is that Germany may no longer support them.

High borrowing costs, capital flight, and economic and political weakness: to escape this vortex, the immediate priority is to get Spain’s and Italy’s bond yields back down. The goal should be to cut borrowing costs below 5 percent – a level that would no longer be that worrying. While most of the ways of doing this have been vetoed by Germany, at least two haven’t.

One is to leverage up the European Stabilisation Mechanism, the region’s bailout fund, so that it has enough money to fund both Madrid and Rome. Neither Germany nor the European Central Bank want to let the ESM borrow money from the ECB itself. But what about lifting the cap on how much it can borrow from the market?

Another option would be for the core countries, led by Germany and France, to subsidise Spain’s and Italy’s interest rates directly – giving back to the southern Europeans part of the benefit they are enjoying from their own extremely low borrowing costs. If they agreed to close half the gap between the core and the periphery, such a scheme would cost around 75 billion euros over seven years, according to a Breakingviews’ calculation. An interest-rate subsidy would also give markets the confidence that Madrid and Rome would be able to finance their debts and so could further lower their borrowing costs.

There would, of course, have to be conditions. In Italy, Monti needs to embark on a second wave of reforms. In particular, he should launch a mass multi-year privatisation programme and a big one-off wealth tax to cut Italy’s debt. But after Spain’s recent plan to clean up its banking sector and further tighten its belt, there is little more to be asked of it.

Germany is right to insist on reforms. But it should balance the stick with a bigger carrot. Otherwise, the single currency from which it benefits so much could collapse.

Comments
4 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

In dramatical comments and opinions about the European debt crisis are drawn in grey and black colors. Spain and Italy, as they had in the past their own currency had always, because of their weak currency, yield of 7 to 12 %, That was normal. So why everybody is afraid? The Euro gave them the first time low yields and in case of Spain, they used it for construction industry in infrastructural projects and the Spanish and the European banks financed this. The lobbing of the big construction entities in Spain worked well and they start to imitate the American role model of Subprime Financial products. The Spanish regions are claiming there independence from the central government in Madrid. Valencia is an example and launched useless projects, that doesn’t let the money work. It is just beautiful, but with no need to be beautiful. Now the party is over and Spain is struggling with the waisted capital. Almost all of that money went into infrastructural projects, airports, harbors, bullet train tracks, Highways and so on. As it was build, the economy didn’t prosper from it as it must to pay the bills. Over 80 % of the wealth of Spain is concentrated in the hands of about 60 families. They can live with 8 % yield.
Italy is different. The basic values of Italy is present. In the North the industry structure and the performance is comparable with Germany 10 years ago. The basic health of Italy is still there. But Berlusconi did hamstring the country of a decade. He sack the country in his own favor. Monti did quite a lot in short time to come back on track and nobody can really doubt about Italian performance chances in the future. But Italy is codefendant of Spain and Greece.
The unemployment rate in Spain is a result of there old and cemented system between strong and socialistic unions and a lag of education how the world economy has changed and what is needed today to reduce unemployment. One thing is for sure, with the old system it will not work. Without a break of traditional work contracts the unemployment will not see any change. The youth unemployment is a direct result of the cemented employment regulations. This all has to change.
Even USA experience now the changed employment situation. The people coming back in work have learned that there job are parlous and they have learned to safe and not spend money.

Posted by HECConsulting | Report as abusive
 

Calming the bond markets is easy. Euro-dependent nations have to jointly announce that eurobonds will be a reality. They would not even have to a set a firm introduction date. Just committing to working towards eurobonds alone will give the markets cause for more caution before driving up any one nation’s interest rates.

Posted by changeling | Report as abusive
 

The core problem is the stronger nations import the goods they got from the weaker from other cheaper labor sources.

There is no way out but to let the weak nations go bankrupt (default on debt or pay it off in script for their local goods). You cannot bleed a dry stone. There is no bankruptcy court or law for local governments in the EU. Making acceptable EU wide commercial laws and courts require election of EU high officials and lots of time. It can be expected in any group of a dozen or so nations of different economies (some small), some will be losers in 20 years and some winners.

EU or no EU the weak nations have to export (small undiversified nations have a great portion of their GDP in trade). They need tax non-exporting investments high and give easy loans and low taxes to those that increase exports). The strong nations will call that export subsidies and is. But how else can the the weak nations hope to get enough exports to support their imports in the medium term.

Posted by Samrch | Report as abusive
 

Too much coffee again, Hugo

Posted by whyknot | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/