China is the elephant in the situation room
Earlier this month the National Intelligence Council released its Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds report â€” a document that comes out once per presidential administration â€” mapping out likely geopolitical trends over the next two decades or so. As usual, itâ€™s a must-read, offering comprehensive analysis of the disparate factors that will drive global politics through 2030.
Further, the NIC took bold steps to correct some previous weaknesses in past reports. In the past the report nailed the â€śwhatâ€ť more often than the â€śwhen.â€ť That is particularly the case with its treatment of the United States, for which â€śpast works assumed U.S. centrality.â€ť This time around the NIC sets an increasingly â€śmulti-polar worldâ€ť â€” which I call the G-Zero â€” as the backdrop of its report, acknowledging that the lack of global leadership has accelerated in the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. Americaâ€™s status as a â€śhegemonic powerâ€ť is eroding, and no country is likely to take its place.
This multipolar world is the foundation for the rest of the NICâ€™s predictions. The report is organized around subsections that range in probability: There are the megatrends that are sure to have an effect, the game-changers that could go a number of ways, and the four potential worlds of 2030.
In my opinion, when it comes to probabilities for the future global order, the single biggest variable â€” both in terms of its importance and its potential variance â€” is Chinaâ€™s rise or lack thereof. If there are twin â€śgigatrendsâ€ť that supersede all else, they are Chinaâ€™s trajectory and the multipolar world in which it is playing out.
China is mentioned more than 300 times in the report, and the NICâ€™s assertion that â€śthe US-China relationship is perhaps the most important bilateral tie shaping the futureâ€ť is dead on (though Iâ€™d cut the word â€śperhapsâ€ť). But despite Chinaâ€™s implicit impact on the report, the NIC doesnâ€™t establish it as the twin pillar alongside the multipolar world it vividly describes. Nor do we get a full sense of how a host of negative China surprises could fundamentally alter the world of 2030 as we imagine it.
A look at each subsection of the NIC report demonstrates just how critical Chinaâ€™s development is â€” or should be â€” in its calculus.
1. Individual empowerment: Reduced poverty, growing middle classes and new communications and technologies will empower individuals around the world.
Individual empowerment is, on balance, a positive global trend. But in China, it is moving along two tracks. There is the increasingly affluent, coastal, urban China, where citizens have access to the Internet and increasingly demand the protections that come with the rule of law, respect for intellectual property rights and tougher environmental standards from their government. In an authoritarian, state capitalist nation, where the central governmentâ€™s priority is to maintain its grip on power, empowered citizens are a wild card. An increasingly affluent population that is demanding more transparency and accountability poses a challenge to regime stability.
On the other hand, there is the half of China that is rural, mainly inland, impoverished and uninformed. Should this group fall further behind, China might face unrest and volatility from the other side of the spectrum. Chinaâ€™s two-speed individual empowerment is a more destabilizing dynamic than it may appear.
2. Diffusion of Power: Without a hegemon, power will shift to â€ścoalitions in a multipolar world.â€ť
This is spot on. But if power is shifting away from the United States and its allies, where is the bulk of it shifting to?Â According to the NIC report, China will provide one-third of global growth by 2025, even if its growth rate should slow considerably. As the United States scales back its role on the global stage, the needs of Chinaâ€™s economy are tying its leaders ever more tightly to the worldâ€™s conflict zones.
3. Demographic patterns: Weâ€™ll see more aging, urbanization and migration.
China is ground zero for all three of these critical demographic trends and the interplay between them. According to some studies, the ratio of Chinese workers per retiree could drop from 8 to 1 today to 2 to 1 by 2040. Thatâ€™s a product of a rapidly aging population â€” and a one-child policy that will keep the labor force from growing fast enough to keep pace. With â€śtwo Chinas,â€ť one urban and empowered, the other impoverished and rural, urbanization and migration will cause significant turbulence in Chinaâ€™s social and economic fabric.
4. Food, water, energy nexus: â€śDemand for these resources will grow substantially â€¦â€ť
For the most part, demand from the developing world â€“ mainly China and India â€‘ for these resources will drive conflict surrounding them. Â Today, China and India are home to 37 percent of the worldâ€™s population â€” and just 10.8 percent of its fresh water. Their share of the population will grow â€” as will demand for water as their middle classes grow.
Food is a similar story. Consider meat, which is particularly grain-intensive (and so requires a lot of water). In 1978, Chinaâ€™s overall meat consumption was one-third that of the United Statesâ€™; today, itâ€™s double. China now eats one-quarter of the global supply of meat, or 71 million tons a year. But per capita, it still only consumes one-quarter as much meat as the United States. Expect the gap to closeâ€”with dramatic ramifications for global food supplies â€” as Chinaâ€™s middle class grows through 2030.
1, 2, 3. Crisis-prone global economy, governance gap, potential for increased conflict: Will multipolarity lead to a collapse or a greater resilience in the global economy? Will a governance gap between countriesâ€™ leadership capacities and changing realities overwhelm governments? Will we see more conflict?
Whether a multipolar world makes the global economy more or less volatile will increasingly depend on Chinaâ€™s trajectory and the role it chooses to play on the global stage. In terms of the governance gap in China, the NIC notes that there is a chance that demand for democratization will vastly outstrip Beijingâ€™s progress in that direction. The NIC sees short- to medium-term volatility arising from rapid democratizationâ€”and â€śa democratic or collapsed Chinaâ€ť in the longer term, with the bright possibility for huge gains should Chinaâ€™s state structure turn democratic.
Unfortunately, in the case of sweeping democratic change, I just cannot get past that word â€ścollapse.â€ť
Think about the Soviet Union in 1991. Then remember that China is on pace to become the worldâ€™s largest economy. In other words, there are a wide range of possible events in China that would have a starkly different â€” and enormous â€” impact on what the world looks like in 2030.
4. Wider scope of regional instability: â€śWill regional instability, especially in the Middle East and South Asia, spill over and create global insecurity?â€ť
In this section, East Asia gets an honorable mention, but it should be front and center. The NIC aptly explains the regional dynamic: â€śRegional trends will pull countries in two directions: toward China economically but toward the U.S. and each other for security.â€ť As China grows, this balancing act will become unsustainable. And with such an outsized percentage of global growth slated to come from East Asia, this regionâ€™s issues are the worldâ€™s issues. I donâ€™t mean to give prospects for Middle Eastern and South Asian instability short shrift â€” they will have their fair share and more. But China and its neighbors are at the center of this trend.
5. Impact of new technologies: Can the advent of new technologies help address global challenges like population growth and climate change?
Technological innovation is a global positive, but its potential to negatively impact China is a substantial piece of the puzzle. Letâ€™s focus first on social media and innovation in information and technology. Any trend that scrambles the status quo of public perception and could potentially pierce the Politburoâ€™s opacity has the potential to be structurally destabilizing. An estimated 570 million Chinese are on the Internet, and approximately 100,000 log in for the first time each day. Can the government keep pace with the lightning speed of technological innovation? What happens if it canâ€™t?
Another field of cutting-edge technology between now and 2030 will be in 3-D printing for manufacturing and robotics. As the NIC explains, these technologies could eliminate low- and middle-wage jobs in developed countries, as has already happened with outsourcing. But what of their impact on a developing nation such as China? A similar â€śoutsourcingâ€ť from human labor to a machine equivalent could be hugely disruptive. Machine-driven economic growth could exacerbate the dichotomy between the poor rural China and the rich urban one. What happens when Chinaâ€™s most valuable resource â€” ample cheap labor â€” becomes the most serious threat to central political control?
6. Role of the United States: â€śWill the U.S. be able to work with new partners to reinvent the economic system?â€ť
The report correctly depicts the role of the United States as a game-changer, but China could use a parallel section. China and Americaâ€™s global actions will increasingly be informed by the other. The reportâ€™s question would better read, â€śWill the U.S. be able to work with countries like China to reinvent the economic system?â€ť Or, if their bilateral relationship proves more contentious, tweak as follows: â€śWill the U.S. be able to work around China?â€ť
In the potential worlds section, we get four distinct global scenarios for 2030 â€” and a disclaimer that the real outcome will likely contain elements from all of them. On one end of the spectrum, we get a world of Stalled Engines, in which the United States has pulled inward, globalization has largely ceased and the powerhouses of global growth have halted. On the other end, there is Fusionâ€”a world where â€śChina and the U.S. collaborate on a range of issues, leading to broader global cooperation.â€ť There are two other scenarios that I wonâ€™t go into here â€” take a look at the report itself to read about them.
All the NICâ€™s scenarios are compelling. But China could be better positioned as a key variable and signpost in determining how we get from today to 2030. I structure what comes next based on two simple questions. First, â€śHow collaborative â€” or hostile â€” will the United States and China be?â€ť Second, â€śHow multipolar will the world really be â€” that is, will other countries be weak or powerful in comparison to the U.S. and China?â€ť If the answers are, respectively, â€śvery collaborativeâ€ť and â€śvery weak in comparison,â€ť then weâ€™ll see a scenario that resembles Fusion, with a workable U.S.-China G2. If, on the other hand, we see a weaker, more adverse U.S.-China, a scenario like Stalled Engines may be more likely. The bottom line: With its vast size and enormous potential for outsized success or failure, Chinaâ€™s trajectory is the true game-changer between today and 2030.
Iâ€™ve only scratched the surface of the NIC report. I highly recommend you read it for yourself. And be sure to look out for China â€” you canâ€™t miss it.
PHOTO:Â Migrant labourers work at a demolished residential site in downtown Shanghai September 5, 2012. Â REUTERS/Aly Song