Bashing China won’t fix U.S. economy

By Derek Scissors
July 7, 2012

(The views expressed in this column are the author’s own and do not represent those of Reuters)

Both ends of the political spectrum seem to be competing to be tougher on China economic issues. They’re both wrong.

Chinese policy does warp the global economy in a number of ways, but 99 percent of our current problems are of our own making. Bashing China feels good but accomplishes nothing.

U.S. President Obama has announced a new World Trade Organisation case against China. This is another in a series of steps featuring the new bureaucracy added last winter. Some of these are minor in impact; others are outright harmful.

In a similar effort, the Republican National Committee’s research arm sent out a list of supposed failures in confronting China. The list relies on a number of protectionists and repeats the false claim, made by China-bashers of all stripes, that Chinese currency policy costs American jobs.

Protectionists say that a weak Chinese currency costs American jobs and that a strong one would restore jobs. The facts say that a weaker RMB is associated with low American unemployment and a stronger RMB is associated with high American unemployment.

Either Chinese currency policy has the opposite effect than protectionists expect or, more likely, it just doesn’t matter. The U.S. creates jobs when we handle the economy properly, and it loses them when we don’t; what China does is almost irrelevant.

This is the real lesson of the political back and forth. If you’re talking a lot about China, you’re not talking enough about how to fix American policy and really help the economy. That’s a mistake no matter who’s making it.

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/