India Insight

An evil “disease”? Gay activists fight govt. in High Court

October 21, 2008

On June 29 of this year, hundreds of gays, lesbians and transsexuals danced and sang on the streets of three Indian cities, hoisting the rainbow flag on the country’s first nationally coordinated gay pride day.

gay1.jpgThough they waved slogans such as “gay and loving it”, many still wore masks – afraid to openly campaign against the dreaded Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which has banned “unnatural” sex since colonial times.

So where do the protesters find themselves nearly four months later, as gay activists battle a (divided) government to scrap the law, taking the case to the Delhi High Court?

The charges leveled by the government against homosexuals appear to be stacking up. Local media has quoted additional solicitor general P P Malhotra as saying homosexuality is a “social vice”, borne of a “perverse mind”.

It has been called the worst form of indecency, while an MP from an independent party called it an “evil” that has been imported into India from the western world and would change the face of India.

Worse, the government says homosexuality is “a disease” – the spreader of killer HIV/AIDS even as it infects the morality of its victims. Malhotra on Monday painted a gloomy picture indeed of what would happen if Indian homosexuals had their way: “AIDS is already spreading in the country and if gay sex is legalized then people on the street would start indulging in such practices saying that the High Court has given approval for it.”

It would, in the words of Home Minister Shivraj Patil, “open the floodgates for delinquent behaviour” for those same people who danced on the streets of Delhi, Kolkata and Bangalore four months ago.

No longer fearing prison, they would flaunt their vice openly on the streets, as police and decent families stand by, powerless to stop them. If, by the government’s own estimate, just 0.3% of Indians are homosexual, that still leaves around three million people to go on the rampage.

So far, though, the High Court has not been impressed. It has dismissed the government’s evidence when it drew on religious texts, including the bible, to attack homosexuality. On Monday the High Court challenged the Centre to prove how homosexuality was a disease, and earlier cheekily asked whether straight sex should also be banned, given it also spreads AIDS.

The cabinet itself is divided: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh found himself asking two members of his cabinet to make up their very public tiff on the issue. Health Minister Ramadoss has been a strong spokesman for the gay campaign, arguing that pushing homosexuality underground has made it harder, not easier, to stop the spread of AIDS.

Gay pride paradeThe question is, if the law is repealed, will homosexuals feel truly free in India, and how much of a backlash will there be against them? Given the social stigma, those who flaunted their pride secretly in June, might still find it hard to out themselves to friends and family, even if the law says they can.

Comments
5 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Wouldn’t it be a shame if Adam, Eve and Steve couldn’t live with gay abandon in a free society?

Posted by madhu | Report as abusive
 

As long as it all happens behind closed doors…whats to bother about? If you cant see it, its not there.

Posted by anon | Report as abusive
 

As long as the intercourse happens with consent from both partners, male or female law shouldnt be implemented on the individuals.

Posted by Aman | Report as abusive
 

Gayt (meaning great!)

 

Nice to see some common sense ruling over the typically populist, backward Indian politicians.

Posted by Chris | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •