<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we need the big bomb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on South Asian politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10614</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10614</guid>
		<description>Of course India needs a bigger bomb and a change to the no first use policy.

Whats the use of making an A bomb and then sitting silently while enemy forces nuke the hell out of you first probably crippling your ability to retaliate with anything let alone nukes.

If one country is allowed to have a nuclear program every other country should have a right to do so as well.

Its quite amusing to see the only country to use an A bomb to go around trying to disarm to or make nuclear deals with other countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course India needs a bigger bomb and a change to the no first use policy.</p>
<p>Whats the use of making an A bomb and then sitting silently while enemy forces nuke the hell out of you first probably crippling your ability to retaliate with anything let alone nukes.</p>
<p>If one country is allowed to have a nuclear program every other country should have a right to do so as well.</p>
<p>Its quite amusing to see the only country to use an A bomb to go around trying to disarm to or make nuclear deals with other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10598</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10598</guid>
		<description>India does not need bigger or smaller bombs.  It needs a different nuclear policy.  The no first use policy is just asking for it.  It opens up India to Pakistan based terrorism, implicitly backed by Pakistan&#039;s nuclear prowess, and it opens up India to serious threats from China which has no such policy.  The policy paints India into a corner.

Those Gandhian principles are great.  But they aren&#039;t practical for the real world.  India needs a new nuclear doctrine designed to counter the actual threats it faces today.  That&#039;ll pay off far more than any improved bomb or delivery technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India does not need bigger or smaller bombs.  It needs a different nuclear policy.  The no first use policy is just asking for it.  It opens up India to Pakistan based terrorism, implicitly backed by Pakistan&#8217;s nuclear prowess, and it opens up India to serious threats from China which has no such policy.  The policy paints India into a corner.</p>
<p>Those Gandhian principles are great.  But they aren&#8217;t practical for the real world.  India needs a new nuclear doctrine designed to counter the actual threats it faces today.  That&#8217;ll pay off far more than any improved bomb or delivery technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10539</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10539</guid>
		<description>even if we have a big bomb, will be we safe? How safe will be we with smaller bombs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even if we have a big bomb, will be we safe? How safe will be we with smaller bombs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: why</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10536</link>
		<dc:creator>why</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10536</guid>
		<description>To have nuclear weapon is to invite others to nuke you first. Its a silly game because even the winner lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To have nuclear weapon is to invite others to nuke you first. Its a silly game because even the winner lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10508</link>
		<dc:creator>venky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10508</guid>
		<description>I would suggest at least a 3-5 MT bomb in 5 years, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest at least a 3-5 MT bomb in 5 years, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raja</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10492</link>
		<dc:creator>raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10492</guid>
		<description>Q.1: Name the ONLY civilized country on earth who dropped the nuclear bomb on other civilized country, killing lakhs of innocent people ?   [Marks: 20]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q.1: Name the ONLY civilized country on earth who dropped the nuclear bomb on other civilized country, killing lakhs of innocent people ?   [Marks: 20]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10491</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10491</guid>
		<description>something big enough to wipe out half the population should be big enough...  might need a couple though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something big enough to wipe out half the population should be big enough&#8230;  might need a couple though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10486</link>
		<dc:creator>azad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10486</guid>
		<description>A-bombs are dirtcheap. Its much more expensive to by jets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-bombs are dirtcheap. Its much more expensive to by jets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10485</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10485</guid>
		<description>Kudos Hassan! I fully agrees with your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos Hassan! I fully agrees with your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaruni Upadhyay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/09/28/do-we-need-the-big-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-10482</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaruni Upadhyay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=1978#comment-10482</guid>
		<description>How could India forget the time when USA sent her nuclear submarine USS Enterprise to force India into surrendering to Pakistan(1971). Had Russia not help us at that time with their own Navy, who knows what would have happened. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971

It is now the same USA who got a taste of her own blood during 9/11 and are now forcing India to cut out a deal with Pakistan.

It&#039;s a bad n mad world out there and our country India is at stake. Not only we need to make bigger and bigger bombs but be ready to use them if the need be so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could India forget the time when USA sent her nuclear submarine USS Enterprise to force India into surrendering to Pakistan(1971). Had Russia not help us at that time with their own Navy, who knows what would have happened. </p>
<p><a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakist ani_War_of_1971</a></p>
<p>It is now the same USA who got a taste of her own blood during 9/11 and are now forcing India to cut out a deal with Pakistan.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bad n mad world out there and our country India is at stake. Not only we need to make bigger and bigger bombs but be ready to use them if the need be so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
