Pinky Anand, counsel for actress Khushboo in the Supreme Court, spoke to Reuters about the case and how the verdict would have a far-reaching impact.
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
in simple logic human beings sixth sense is taken off. the judgement is going to have far reaching effect for the the wrong doers including in certain pending cases. perfections and corrections have no significance by simply permitting two adults consenting to sex. quoting lord krishna has no logic. how lord rama was overlooked being person who maintained the Hindu sanctuity of Eka Pathni Vritha. Human beings are not commodities or animals to have exchanges as they like. the judgement has to be reviewed by referring to a fuller bench constituing the entire supreme court judges. there is a possibility for Nithyananda to escape based on this judgement who has gone to th eextent of creating agreements for sexual exchanges.
this judgement needs a fuller bench of entire supreme court for review as it has far reaching adverse consequences in the society. human beings have sense and not animals