Comments on: Ayodhya verdict – LIVE Blog http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/ Perspectives on South Asian politics Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:03:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: KINGFISHER http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15659 Sun, 03 Oct 2010 23:35:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15659 The verdict or the ruling given by the court very unfortunately violates the constitutional provision of right of the minority. The contention of the case that was hanging in the court was not to divide the land between Hindu and Muslim. Nevertheless, the fact remains the court ruling was a political ruling than a legal verdict on the real issue of the case.

I presume that soon the ruling will ensue legal fight wherein Congress Party may be faced with bad days to extricate its responsibilities from the demolition of the mosque and the killing of the people on account for dragging the genocide case for decades. There may be a demand soon for transferring the case to the International court of justice.

There is nothing to be happy about the ruling as it seems days ahead is very bleak for the government on the issue both for issuing a political verdict by a court violating the constitutional provision of the right of minority and dividing the land. And dragging the genocide case willfully for decades.

]]>
By: Gaurang_S http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15658 Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:34:05 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15658 The verdict seems to be an attempt to strike balance among the contesting parties, but sadly it inadvertently rationalises the sad turn of events that shook Nation on infamous date Dec 06, 1992. Now, here is an opportunity for all of us to rebuid the place of worship wherein the rainbow of all faith and cultural Indian panorama reflects. Let our prejudices be subordinated to humanity and the Indian temple, with Ram, Allah, Wahe Guru, Jesus etc all side by side showing true colour of our diversity come up. God bless India and its citizens.

]]>
By: rehmat http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15657 Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:53:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15657 hotmanish
“We all know that Lord Ram was born at the site and a temple was built there since this place is sacred. the mughal emperor destroyed this holy temple and buil a mosque over it. that is why, the temple shuld be built here to adore Lord Ram”
***Building Temple alone or Mosque alone is a recipe for riots. Respect the verdict and move on.

]]>
By: hotmanish http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15651 Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:47:50 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15651 It is best that the original status should be restored. We all know that Lord Ram was born at the site and a temple was built there since this place is sacred. the mughal emperor destroyed this holy temple and buil a mosque over it. that is why, the temple shuld be built here to adore Lord Ram

]]>
By: rehmat http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15649 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:42:13 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15649 spsyed and hellopeople

Sticking to the past can make present and future hell. Let us see what would be the reaction of Hindus and Muslims masses if the verdict says a) a Mosque should be rebuilt or b) A temple should be constructed c) the current verdict.

Verdict a and b would have led to thousands dead by now and disturbed the communal harmony we have now. What we need is a break from riots which serve no purpose.

It is impossible to please everyone and even be 100% pleased with the verdict but the Lucknow bench has done a decent job.

]]>
By: rehmat http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15648 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:27:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15648 Good judgment

]]>
By: babuks http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15646 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:33:06 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15646 Great!
We have proved our secularity to the world WHICH NO OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD COULD PROVIDE. We have shown that we are one in all the possible diversity and thats our strength.Lets all work together to make it a common place or memorial for the WORLD PEACE.Lets divert our attention to fight againt poverty,disease,shortage of water to help sustaining the very presence of DIVINITY — thats “LIFE”.Its the same God who created humans ,has created bacteria and animals as well(for which there is no religion ans so no fight of that kind)and He doesn’t require any human intervention(if thats the case who preserved him from the beginning of the Universe!!!).Dont heed to the narrow minded interests of the Clergy/religious community which tries to do fishing in muddled waters.We want to sustain PEACE and harmony.
So this is the time to think,and contribue your reasoning for the noble cause of living for the country,upholding our famous INDIAN CULTURE and continue to refresh the peaceful atmosphere in the country.ITS ALL THAT THE GOD HIMSELF WOULD DO FOR US.

]]>
By: freakyfellow http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15645 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:04:13 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15645 The best verdict could have been, the area to be given to the military, for the country, than to a group of people. It still will be used for the welfare of the nation. or a tribute to the military, a museum could be made. so historic value of the land is not lost. by giving the land to a group will lead to another 50 yrs of fight between our own brothers and sisters.

]]>
By: Hellopeople http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15644 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:00:05 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15644 Very well said spsyed. It is extemely cruel to justify the unethical destruction of a mosque by mobs led by power hungry extremists in 21st century modern India .We are in no position to talk of what happened 1000’s and 1000’s of years ago. The suit of wakf board was dismissed stating time as a factor (case not registered within six years). Then why pass a judgement based on what happened thousands of years ago, i.e a temple being destroyed to make a mosque? Time is a bigger factor here. To top it up, empathy and maganimity is expected from the minority community by expecting them in helping in the building of temple and forgetting about the thousands of muslims who were slaughtered by the champions of the movement. Why don’t hindus express magnanimity and talk of rebuilding of the destroyed mosque on the 1/3 land given to them? why r all the suddenly awakened and enlightened mafia representatives in light of the delightful judgement only talking of muslims helping in the construction of a mosque while they climbed on domes to destroy a mosque and also distributed sweets? The gleam in their eyes today makes us sick!

]]>
By: svishal http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/09/30/ayodhya-verdict-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-15642 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:30:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3742#comment-15642 Finally a verdict has come in possibly the biggest land dispute under Indian Judiciary. The judgement shows the high level of maturity and more importantly it is welcomed open heartedly by almost every entity of the society. Good to see India firms united and it should be analysed as a positive sign of “New Aged India”. Media deserves full credit and appreciation in maintaining the peace and spreading harmony across the country. Unity in diversity can lead to a massive rebuild of the nation. God bless us!!

]]>