Comments on: Suu Kyi underlines India’s strategic approach to Myanmar http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/11/24/suu-kyi-underlines-india-strategic-approach-to-myanmar/ Perspectives on South Asian politics Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:03:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: KINGFISHER http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/11/24/suu-kyi-underlines-india-strategic-approach-to-myanmar/comment-page-1/#comment-16523 Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:40:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3962#comment-16523 I have gone through the synopsis of subject matter under discussion and the two comments on it. It is for the first time that a Lady out of personal practical experience spelled out the bitter truth with sadness, which she would never have if she had had a word of sympathy from India on and for Burmese democracy during her days of detention.

Suu Kyi forgot that India is that country that can lay itself to any country, and can betray a friend in time of danger for money. It is a greedy country, as is reported that India has established a puppet government and through it is running a single party rule in a nascent democratic country in the east. The population of that country is reported to hate India for its interference and helping one party rule openly, opined a number of political Observers of the area.

Over and above it, various disputes like water, border marking, and sea demarcations is pending for decades they said. They further added that as it is a small country the opposition alleges that India gag them not to talk with show of their might.

Foreigners are amazed seeing the surface of Indian beauty but only few know them what monstrous they look like from inside. Chinese know them better as the lived, ate and slept together with Indian for many decades. That is why Chinese have already trapped them through Myanmar in lucrative trade or business deal. Here US are too late to enter.

Say, do and support how much the Indian will not buzz an inch from where they are now because of one fear Chinese may not attack their back when they are at sleep, over and above by the time US to help, the game would be over by then.

So Suu Kyi may have grievances against India but India cares a damn about her feeling and comments.

India is a coward nation. It can boast of its military power in the region, but when it comes to confrontation with equals it is on record it could not do well with its opponent Pakistan. Except in 1971 when India with the help of Russia helped the then East Pakistan to secede. India is very good in conspiratorial, genocide committal and in Human Rights violation activities..

Political Observers opined that Suu Kye should shun Indian help in her fight to establish democracy in Myanmar or else accepting help from India may cost much more that she can estimate in figures.

]]>
By: Letsdoit http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/11/24/suu-kyi-underlines-india-strategic-approach-to-myanmar/comment-page-1/#comment-16517 Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:45:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3962#comment-16517 Indian politicians have always been without any morals and ethics. It was surprising that they supported the South Africans against the Apartheid but then China was not a dominant factor. Suu Kyi is absolutely right when she admonishes the Indian Govt. and their policies towards Myanmar. It is absolutely shameless on the part of the Indian Govt. treats the democratic movement in a shaby manner. Most or even all the Indian politicians do not know what Suu Kyi’s father did for India. It is painfully disgraceful.

]]>
By: Windturner http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2010/11/24/suu-kyi-underlines-india-strategic-approach-to-myanmar/comment-page-1/#comment-16512 Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:05:31 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=3962#comment-16512 Someone said this about the holocaust: “Thou shalt not be a victim, thou shalt not be a perpetrator, but, above all, thou shalt not be a bystander.”

Indian leadership needs to think beyond economy and GDP. And think beyond China. Chinese give a damn about what we are doing, this paranoia is one sided and has taken us away from what our past leaders always stood for

There is another one from Reverend Martin Niemoller: “In Germany they first came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me-and by that time no one was left to speak up.”

]]>