Is India really the world’s fifth most powerful country?

April 13, 2011

India is the world’s fifth most powerful country, according to a New Delhi-authored national security document, the Times of India reported on Wednesday, as Indian analysts placed the emerging nation above major European powers.

Outranking traditional global powers such as the UK, France and Germany, India’s ballooning population, defense capabilities and economic clout were cited as reasons for its position behind only the U.S., China, Japan and Russia in India’s National Security Annual Review 2010, which will be officially released by the country’s foreign ministry next week.

Its statistical foundations in terms of population numbers and GDP aside — in terms of purchasing power parity, it should be noted — India’s experience of wielding power on the global stage of late, boosted by its temporary seat on the United Nations Security Council, has been less encouraging.

India has failed to cultivate a wholly reciprocal relationship with the United States, despite warm rhetoric in recent years between New Delhi and Washington and a number of big-ticket diplomatic and industrial agreements.

New Delhi appears to struggle to assert itself in the face of growing Chinese influence in south Asia, has dithered on formulating a firm approach to states such as Iran, and risked appearing naive and out of its depth during the lead-up to international efforts to protect civilians in Libya.

Indeed, an apparent united front from Beijing, Moscow and New Delhi, representing three of the top five most powerful nations according to the report, against the no-fly zone in the North African country has had no discernible effect on the ongoing military action against Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.

Furthermore, India still appears more concerned and engaged with, and distracted by, its long-standing rival Pakistan than wider geopolitical issues.

A booming economy and a soaring population are undeniably a source of power for the emerging power, but a nominal GDP to challenge the major European powerhouses, at least, will require a number of years of shrewd policymaking and careful economic management.

Recent troubles such as falling FDI inflows, rampant corruption and high inflation must be curbed, and the millions of young people reaching working age each year need to be provided jobs if the demographic dividend is not to become a demographic disaster.

Military imports by New Delhi recently became the world’s largest, and a strong military presence was cited in the report as a factor in India’s high overall position, but it remains to be seen how long a reliance on American, British, Russian and French firepower can last.

India still receives billions of dollars of aid from countries deemed less powerful by New Delhi than itself, and praise from David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy, the premiers of Britain and France during high-profile visits last year, was met with an outpouring of thanks from Indian policymakers.

India is certainly a emerging power with huge potential, but could New Delhi’s economic and political analysts be patting themselves on the back a little prematurely?

4 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

And your point is?

Posted by DaraIndia | Report as abusive

Henry,
The Indian people, especially the poor and the middle class do not think so. Majority of the Indians know the reality on the ground. The people in power have a different view because they see things from a different height. I think this is true for many countries but more so in India because the gap between the haves and the have nots is so wide.
You have failed to describe the report in enough detail. You should have noted that the Index which is used in the report uses specific indicators to rank and compare countries. The report is looking at a macro picture and countries as discrete units which can be compared across different variables. Your article is all over the place. China’s involvement, Libya’s situation, Pak’s situation, and the economy? I can see the picture you are trying to paint. Key word here is trying. Speaking of Libya, it looks like Nato has got it all under control right now! China and Pak have been going on for 60 years. What are you expecting? A master stroke moment that will solve all problems? For the economy, the factory output has dropped but still it is chugging along. I am sure you are aware of the cyclic behavior of the economy. For corruption, I think it’s great. Anyone that is remotely familiar with India knows that corruption has been there from the start, and is in the roots of the system. Even if it’s embarrassing now, it is good in the long term. With scandals coming out left right and center, the pressure for real reform will grow. This is growth. The scary part is when these things don’t come out and continue to grow (like in the past). Please point out all the criticisms of India. It is very important that we do that for good policy making. However, lets do it in an objective manner.

Posted by rainydays | Report as abusive

Straight and honest answer should be: Yes it is very much premature. Surprised of two things in their equation: 1) How can a country could rate themselves with an insufficient information available about other countries and 2) No having any weightage on number of Innovations and Indigenous Patents – Something like technologically self-standing nation.

Posted by Citizen_On_High | Report as abusive

Libya? We have three countries meddling in a ex colony of another European great power (Italy) in the name of humanity and all we are doing is creating a bigger unresolved mess.

Posted by ofilha | Report as abusive