Anti-graft wars: Empire strikes back at Team Anna

September 6, 2011

They rode a popular wave of discontent over spiralling corruption to force the government to bend to their demands and led an otherwise fractious parliament to arrive at a consensus on an anti-graft bill, in the process becoming media celebrities — their figurehead even hailed a national hero.

But now, activists led by Anna Hazare, whose campaign against corruption captured the imagination of millions across the country and prompted round-the-clock media coverage, say they are being targeted by official machinery for ruffling important feathers.

Hazare’s aides Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi and Prashant Bhushan have all received breach of privilege notices from parliament for derogatory comments they reportedly made against legislators.

Kejriwal has also received another notice from the IT department asking him to pay 9.27 lakh rupees ($20,196) in dues for alleged violation of bond clauses while serving in the government.

Bedi received the privilege notice for accusing politicians of wearing “several masks”, while Bhushan is said to have accused MPs of taking bribes to pass laws, though he denied this.

Anna Hazare himself has been accused of misusing a trust fund headed by him. Media reports said a government task force found the expenditure of 2.20 lakh rupees on Hazare’s 60th birthday celebrations amounted to misapplication of funds of the Hind Swaraj Trust.

The whole affair has a precedent. In June, the government began probing the assets of popular yoga guru Baba Ramdev, whose $40 million-a-year yoga empire hadn’t raised official eyebrows till then, after he launched an anti-graft agitation.

The government denies targeting anyone, but activists insist the timing, for instance, of the IT notice on Kajriwal smacks of a “vindictive attitude“.

With ‘Team Anna’ threatening more activism in future, they will invite more scrutiny of their personal and public life, their past history and dealings dug up for any skeletons (deservedly or not).

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

The “breach of privilege” notices issued by Parliament to actor Om Puri and members of Team Anna such as Kiran Bedi cannot, I believe, sustain a challenge in the Supreme Court. This is because the “breach of privilege” and “contempt of parliament” clauses were not created for offenses as trivial as someone calling MPs names. The libel has to affect Parliament’s ability to function – that is the spirit of parliamentary law, spelled out clearly. If an eminent lawyer were to challenge these breach of privilege notices in the Supreme Court, I believe he could win. To see the full arguments for this, please see http://www.leftbrainwave.com/2011/09/are -breach-of-privilege-notices-sent.html and http://www.leftbrainwave.com/2011/09/doe s-parliament-have-right-to-issue.html
Thank you.

Posted by nayakan88 | Report as abusive