<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India needs a tough hostage policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/04/27/india-needs-a-tough-hostage-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/04/27/india-needs-a-tough-hostage-policy/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on South Asian politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maGiK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/04/27/india-needs-a-tough-hostage-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-19956</link>
		<dc:creator>maGiK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=5613#comment-19956</guid>
		<description>//Many recent editorials in the media have called on the government to get tough on anti-state elements, with some even advocating a ‘no negotiation’ policy.//

Well said. But India being federal in nature things almost always need to go through a definitive set of meetings with whoever involved in tackling the Maoists menace at the state level. The recent meeting on NCTC (a Center- formulated bill prescribing a stricter control of terrorism) has exposed many shortcomings as far as allocating powers to the states are concerned. The very states (notably Tamil Nadu and Gujarat) who raised a &#039;hue and cry&#039; at the meet for they believed the bill might infringe upon the constitutionally drawn state rights, have often resorted to extra-judicial killings in dealing with crime inside their territories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//Many recent editorials in the media have called on the government to get tough on anti-state elements, with some even advocating a ‘no negotiation’ policy.//</p>
<p>Well said. But India being federal in nature things almost always need to go through a definitive set of meetings with whoever involved in tackling the Maoists menace at the state level. The recent meeting on NCTC (a Center- formulated bill prescribing a stricter control of terrorism) has exposed many shortcomings as far as allocating powers to the states are concerned. The very states (notably Tamil Nadu and Gujarat) who raised a &#8216;hue and cry&#8217; at the meet for they believed the bill might infringe upon the constitutionally drawn state rights, have often resorted to extra-judicial killings in dealing with crime inside their territories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
