An atom of doubt at the Kudankulam nuclear power plant

July 17, 2012

Opponents of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, under construction in Tamil Nadu, are raising fresh questions about the plant’s safety because of Indian government documents that they say reveal a problem in the design of one of the two reactors.

The reactor’s design differs from the plan that Russia and India came up with when they agreed to build the reactor in 1988, according to the documents published by India’s Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.

The design of the reactor pressure vessel, which contains the reactor coolant and core, was not supposed to have welds in its core region, the bulletin said. The vessel has two welds there, it said.

People who live near the Kudankulam plant and the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy called this deviation a “serious breach of contract” that exposes the plant to high failure risk and a higher possibility of offsite radiological contamination.

“This is a breach of contract by the supplier in Russia. NPCIL (Nuclear Power Corporation of India) officers who knew [about] this breach are guilty of causing future financial loss by choosing lower quality equipment,” said Nityanand Jayaraman, environmental researcher and member of the Chennai Solidarity Group for Kudankulam Struggle.

RS Sundar, the plant’s site director, denied that it was a “breach of contract”. “The original discussion between Indian and Russian governments on procuring reactor vessels without welds was based on futuristic thinking,” he told me. “But that was not possible technologically at the time of procurement.”

Addressing safety, Sundar said, “all the 400-plus light water reactors in operation across the globe [have] welds in the core zone.”

India’s nuclear program in its early years was an epitome of national pride as most of the technology was domestically developed, with India not being a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But with the lifting of a ban by the Nuclear Suppliers Group and after the Fukushima disaster in Japan, the feeling of pride has been replaced by safety concerns among the general public, especially those living around the project areas. There are 20 nuclear power plants in India spread across six states producing a total of 4780 megawatts of electricity. Three new projects including Kudankulam are near completion.

The controversy over the reactor welds is one of many problems that have kept the anti-nuclear protests alive in Kudankulam. Another is over the source of fresh water for the plant’s cooling towers.

The Environmental Impact Assessment conducted in 2003 assumes that the Pechiparai Reservoir will be the source of fresh water, with a reserve of 60,000 cubic metres. Farmers have protested the use of reservoir water, however, and now there are four plants for desalinating ocean water. The environmental impact of using this water has not been assessed.

The on-campus water reserve was also reduced to 12,000 cubic metres, 20 percent of what was proposed. Environmentalists say that this is a “serious breach of safety” by the government’s nuclear authorities, especially after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan.

While the limited information available to the public has mobilised some people against the project, the nuclear power corporation authorities are keeping other reports private.

The Safety Analysis Report is one of the key documents that protesters have demanded that the NPCIL release. Despite efforts to get that information, the nuclear power corporation has been reluctant to share it claiming it was a third party document. Russian atomic supplier, Atomstroyexport, is not bound by the civil nuclear liability law because the law, which holds the operator liable for nuclear damages, was drafted after the 1988 agreement to design the plant.

This reticence has turned people who have a neutral or even positive opinion on nuclear power against the project. What might people think about nuclear power in India if the government chose to be more forthcoming about its facilities? Surely, it would be a more positive view than it seems to be now.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

All that NPCIL should do is make public all the documents pertaining to nuclear safety as in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster, stress tests on Russia’s nuclear reactors have been conducted and a report was prepared by the state agencies concerned.

The report was presented to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev , at a state council meeting on June 9, 2011. The report is remarkable for its extraordinary candour.

The report revealed that Russia’s atomic reactors are grievously under-prepared for both natural and man-made disasters ranging from floods to fires to earthquakes or plain negligence.

The findings in the report are ominous for the Russian VVER 1000 nuclear reactors at Koodankulam in Tamilnadu. The people’s movement against Koodankulam nuclear plant should not be brushed aside on political grounds. (Courtesy – Captain BK Subbarao)

Posted by GSPatil | Report as abusive

[…] about its facilities? Surely, it would be a more positive view than it seems to be now. 2/07/17/an-atom-of-doubt-at-the-kudankul am-nuclear-power-plant/ Like this:LikeBe the first to like […]

Posted by Secrecy and safety issues at troubled Kudankulam nuclear power plant « nuclear-news | Report as abusive

[…] Kudankulam projectsHindustan TimesIndia's Kudankulam NPP to be launched soonThe Voice of RussiaReuters India (blog)all 11 news articles » Share […]

Posted by Russia to give $ 3.4 billion credit for two more atomic power plants in Tamil Nadu – Economic Times · Sync Dating and Sync Date – Real Online DatingSync Dating and Sync Date – Real Online Dating | Report as abusive

Public having doubts regarding safety of nuclear reactors is understandable and in a way should be welcome. In this report I see an observation, “India’s nuclear program in its early years was an epitome of national pride as most of the technology was domestically developed.” The author of the doubts seems to be concentrating only on imported reactors. This implicit faith in Indian reactor technology and safety aspects is commendable. At the same time I would like to ask, “On what grounds this implicit faith developed?” I don’t want to hint that Indian designs are faulty. I only want to stress that Indian designers are excellent and they take care of all safety aspects. Over the years, one can agree, they have only become more experienced and learnt many more things. NPCIL as the nodal agency is the one which is still in the field and still constructing reactors, which the author underwrites as safe. Only this group is accepting foreign designs and after an examination. Why do the same people now not accept their judgement in this respect?

Does Dr. Subba Rao, who seems to be an expert on all matters nuclear also underwrite all Indian designed reactors that were built as safe in all respects?

Posted by TKSMURTHY | Report as abusive

This is the first time that the nuclear establishment is openly accepting that the core of plant does contain welds. When the activists raised this issue few months back, there was stoic silence on part of the scientists.

However, the article fails to ask certain fundamental questions. How can an agreement as important as this be based on “futuristic thinking?” So will these scientists strike a deal for flying saucers and stuff like that if some Russian company proposes? And then come back and say,” No. The flying part was not possible so we bought just the saucer.”

The callousness with which the scientist has replied is condemnable. Apart from the aspect of security itself, the plant has been the locus of some of the worst anti-democratic crackdown in the country. Thousands have been booked for sedition and other grave charges just for standing up against the State.

Energy out of this plant might power lights across the country but it is moving citizens into dark ages by ridiculing democratic values.

Posted by Sruthisagar | Report as abusive

[…] company in Namibia get the green go-ahead INDIA: Farmers protest nuclear power plant in Haryana An atom of doubt at the Kudankulam nuclear power plant BSF troupe causing trouble in Mizoram’s biggest tiger reserve Kishengange project seeing more […]

Posted by Eerily similiarly « green gargoyle | Report as abusive