<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arvind Kejriwal: when lightning doesn&#8217;t strike thrice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/10/19/arvind-kejriwal-when-lightning-doesnt-strike-thrice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/10/19/arvind-kejriwal-when-lightning-doesnt-strike-thrice/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on South Asian politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: holler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/10/19/arvind-kejriwal-when-lightning-doesnt-strike-thrice/comment-page-1/#comment-25966</link>
		<dc:creator>holler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7036#comment-25966</guid>
		<description>Kejriwal has won the hearts of many already...digvijay&#039;s comments is just a tactic to divert the main issues that are at hand, to take the news away from the corruption practices,that the government,doesnt seem to take care. The evidence is out there in the public domain, not sure why reuters is not raking it up to see for themselves. Do they need someone to show the facts ? Yesterday&#039;s ndtv exclusive, made gadkari out of words to prove the companies that were non existent . companies that held major share, did not exist in the place mentioned in the website as per ndtvs investigation !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kejriwal has won the hearts of many already&#8230;digvijay&#8217;s comments is just a tactic to divert the main issues that are at hand, to take the news away from the corruption practices,that the government,doesnt seem to take care. The evidence is out there in the public domain, not sure why reuters is not raking it up to see for themselves. Do they need someone to show the facts ? Yesterday&#8217;s ndtv exclusive, made gadkari out of words to prove the companies that were non existent . companies that held major share, did not exist in the place mentioned in the website as per ndtvs investigation !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
