<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No criticism please, we are Indians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on South Asian politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayankshukla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26811</link>
		<dc:creator>mayankshukla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26811</guid>
		<description>It is true that no one can decide the extent of freedom of speech however only two viz. law and power, whether legally or by vandalism.
  Fundamental Duties are not mandatory in India, it doesn&#039;t interpret that they are not in context of any situation. A person should be disciplined while using his/her rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that no one can decide the extent of freedom of speech however only two viz. law and power, whether legally or by vandalism.<br />
  Fundamental Duties are not mandatory in India, it doesn&#8217;t interpret that they are not in context of any situation. A person should be disciplined while using his/her rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayankshukla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26810</link>
		<dc:creator>mayankshukla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26810</guid>
		<description>And even the headline didn&#039;t speak the truth... &quot;we are Indians&quot;. Do you think that after WTC attacks, if someone expressed his/her views in public that Taliban is the pedigree of US policy, who would left him/her free. even knowing that the fact is correct and everyone has right to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And even the headline didn&#8217;t speak the truth&#8230; &#8220;we are Indians&#8221;. Do you think that after WTC attacks, if someone expressed his/her views in public that Taliban is the pedigree of US policy, who would left him/her free. even knowing that the fact is correct and everyone has right to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayankshukla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26809</link>
		<dc:creator>mayankshukla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26809</guid>
		<description>Thanks. The metaphor only suggests that at the time of death of Bal Thackrey, the situation of mumbai was critical and that&#039;s the reason 20000 policemen were deployed, and even knowing this factor, was this necessary for someone to express his feeling on the behalf of freedom of speech? Who would be responsible for any unwanted aftermath of such freedom of speech factor ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. The metaphor only suggests that at the time of death of Bal Thackrey, the situation of mumbai was critical and that&#8217;s the reason 20000 policemen were deployed, and even knowing this factor, was this necessary for someone to express his feeling on the behalf of freedom of speech? Who would be responsible for any unwanted aftermath of such freedom of speech factor ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacMillan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26806</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26806</guid>
		<description>The best part about freedom of speech is that no one has the right to decide whether you used it properly. That&#039;s why it&#039;s called freedom of speech. Thanks for sharing your speech, meanwhile. Please come back - I love to see people reading here.
Robert MacMillan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part about freedom of speech is that no one has the right to decide whether you used it properly. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s called freedom of speech. Thanks for sharing your speech, meanwhile. Please come back &#8211; I love to see people reading here.<br />
Robert MacMillan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacMillan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26805</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26805</guid>
		<description>What is the implication of your metaphor about the lighter and the pump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the implication of your metaphor about the lighter and the pump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kets</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26799</link>
		<dc:creator>Kets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26799</guid>
		<description>Balashaeb Thakare is really not less than a god for many people in Maharashtra. In such a case it was unwarranted from that girl to express such immature opinion. Free speech right should not be used wrongly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balashaeb Thakare is really not less than a god for many people in Maharashtra. In such a case it was unwarranted from that girl to express such immature opinion. Free speech right should not be used wrongly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayankshukla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2012/11/19/no-criticism-please-we-are-indians/comment-page-1/#comment-26793</link>
		<dc:creator>mayankshukla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/india/?p=7390#comment-26793</guid>
		<description>Kindly understand Mr. Author, your freedom of speech halts from where the reaches of my ears start. Is this necessary to speak on every and each topic even not understanding a bit about it. If the girl didn&#039;t know about the sentiments of 20 lakhs people who attended the funeral on their own wish, how could she able to comment on the situation. 
&quot;FIRST LEARN THEN SPEAK&quot; . After igniting a lighter at petrol pump you can&#039;t give the excuse that you don&#039;t know hydrocarbons are inflammable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kindly understand Mr. Author, your freedom of speech halts from where the reaches of my ears start. Is this necessary to speak on every and each topic even not understanding a bit about it. If the girl didn&#8217;t know about the sentiments of 20 lakhs people who attended the funeral on their own wish, how could she able to comment on the situation.<br />
&#8220;FIRST LEARN THEN SPEAK&#8221; . After igniting a lighter at petrol pump you can&#8217;t give the excuse that you don&#8217;t know hydrocarbons are inflammable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
