It’s all in the family: India’s love for dynasties

January 20, 2013

Rahul Gandhi is now vice president of the Congress party. Anyone who has been following Indian politics will know that this was inevitable. Despite royal titles having been abolished, Indians can’t seem to give up on the idea of dynastic rule.

Whether it’s politics, business, or even Bollywood, Indians seem to have trust issues with anyone who is not their offspring, preferring to hand over the reins to their sons and daughters, irrespective of whether they might be deserving or not. The desire to make it merely on the basis of family name is reflected in a commonly heard boast at parties or dinner conversation: “Do you know who my father is?”

The Nehru-Gandhi family is of course the most prominent political dynasty in the country with four generations of the family having ruled the country, but they are not the only ones. There are several dynasties across party lines all over the country. Here are some of them:

The Yadavs: Mulayam Singh Yadav, for long one of the most prominent leaders in Uttar Pradesh, handed over the reins of the state to his son Akhilesh Yadav when the party won elections in the state last year. Akhilesh had been a member of parliament but never held any state government post. He became the youngest chief minister of UP at the age of 38.

The Thackerays: One of Sonia Gandhi’s fiercest critics, Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray slammed her and her family for running a “fiefdom” and then went ahead and did exactly the same thing. In 2004, Thackeray declared son Uddhav, a political novice, as leader of his right-wing party which has strong roots in Maharashtra. This angered another family member – nephew Raj – who left to form his own party. Uddhav, meanwhile, is carrying on in the footsteps of his father – grooming his son Aditya to take control of the party in the future.

The Pawars: Sharad Pawar is often called the most influential Indian politician who never became PM and his Nationalist Congress Party is one of the Congress’s most crucial allies. Pawar’s daughter, Supriya Sule is likely to take over from him as leader of the party, pipping cousin Ajit.

The Abdullahs: The National Conference, the party in power in Jammu and Kashmir, is also a prime example of dynastic politics. Three generations of the Abdullah family have controlled the party (Sheikh Abdullah, his son Farooq Abdullah and Farooq’s son Omar, who is currently CM) and the state since India’s independence in 1947.

Corporate India: Even big business houses are quite often family-run enterprises. The Birlas, the Tatas and the Ambanis, three names that signify wealth and entrepreneurship for Indians, have passed on the baton from generation to generation, rarely allowing outsiders to head their conglomerates. The Tata group’s famous search for a successor to Ratan Tata ended close to home with Cyrus Mistry, who is “ a Tata in all but name.”

Several newer business families, whether is it the Biyanis, the Adanis or even steel tycoon L N Mittal, have promoted their sons or daughters to prominent positions in their companies and making succession plans amply clear.

Bollywood: If ever there was a fiefdom in India, then it is located in Western Mumbai, and in the suburbs of Bandra and Juhu, where all of Bollywood reside. The landscape of the film industry is dotted with “star kids”, children of film personalities who are “launched” into the industry with much fanfare by their adoring parents, hoping that their children will continue to capture the imagination of audiences. The Bachchans, the Kapoors, the Chopras and pretty much every other film producer and director have all promoted their progeny in films, lack of talent notwithstanding.

Some have made it, some have fallen by the wayside, but they’ve all tried to make it on the strength of their famous last names.

5 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

What about US wannabe dynasties: Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, etc

Posted by econdoc37 | Report as abusive

Love for dynasty or dearth of credible leadership in the country. In any case it’s a fact that the Central Government has definitely done lot of work in spite of their not being absolute power , though not sufficient. We need to compare their performance with Governments in the past and then come to any conclusion. Aadhaar Card, Direct transfer of subsidy to the beneficiary account, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme is all going to fetch reward in the long term.

Posted by rajeev1956 | Report as abusive

At the end of the day the quality matters. Dynasty can help in giving a good start to one’s carrer but later the talent and knowledge sails the person’s carrer. The dynasty definitely prepares a good launching pad and it has helped many with real talent but could not come to rescue of many like Abhishek Bacchan, Tushar Kapoor and Rahul Gandhi is the biggest example, where Ranbir Kapoor, Sonakshi Sinha and Akhilash Yadav came out with flying colors.

Posted by ravivaid | Report as abusive

Just want to add an interesting point by Minhaz Merchant: even if children follow their parent’s profession, they first get qualified. A doctor’s child becomes doctor after earning degree through hard work. No one says since your father is a doctor,you can treat me. Actors are made and unmade every Friday. Belonging to a particular dynasty doesn’t mean you automatically take that profession. You need to work. Now consider our politicos, you will get the answer whether dynasties are justified or not.

Posted by Woman21 | Report as abusive

Dynasty power is another form of corruption that keeps the Indians in poverty. Every Indian politician claims to be serving the masses and the country but you only need to see the plight of 400 Million Indians who struggle to make any decent living yet the the politician live in a style more akin with Maharajahs of past.Every Indian scandal has politicians at its core. In India politics is a family business which is run to maximise family fortunes whilst promising a false hope to its citizens. Even God cannot help a country like India where politician knowingly abuse power in the full knowledge that judiciary deliberately chucks along at snail speed so that the vested interests of the corrupt are preserved for perpetuity so don’t expect any change until Indians vote for a massive change. Perhaps Modi’s poor origins may be the catalyst for clean-up, wait and see. Jai Hind

Posted by Gurminder | Report as abusive