<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Apple (and maybe you, too) can learn from the NFL fumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/2012/09/28/what-apple-and-maybe-you-too-can-learn-from-the-nfl-fumble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/2012/09/28/what-apple-and-maybe-you-too-can-learn-from-the-nfl-fumble/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/2012/09/28/what-apple-and-maybe-you-too-can-learn-from-the-nfl-fumble/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/?p=191#comment-889</guid>
		<description>In the most important debate of his political career, the Vice President decided it was acceptable to make the discussion a &quot;laughing matter&quot;. In his duties as Vice President, or should he be required to assume the duties of  the President, do we want a person that considers the most important discussions and decisions of his office to be a &quot;laughing matter&quot;, condescending and rude to the listener who could very well be a very sensitive and volatile adversary? Or, do we want a level-headed, respectful, and polite champion for our best interests that is a gentleman with decorum and basic manners?

Vice-President Biden is an embarassment to the Office of The Vice-President, to the American people, and to himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the most important debate of his political career, the Vice President decided it was acceptable to make the discussion a &#8220;laughing matter&#8221;. In his duties as Vice President, or should he be required to assume the duties of  the President, do we want a person that considers the most important discussions and decisions of his office to be a &#8220;laughing matter&#8221;, condescending and rude to the listener who could very well be a very sensitive and volatile adversary? Or, do we want a level-headed, respectful, and polite champion for our best interests that is a gentleman with decorum and basic manners?</p>
<p>Vice-President Biden is an embarassment to the Office of The Vice-President, to the American people, and to himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonojitBanerjee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/2012/09/28/what-apple-and-maybe-you-too-can-learn-from-the-nfl-fumble/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>MonojitBanerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/?p=191#comment-885</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to have some background information for posts like these. I follow your blog from India. It is not always possible to be aware of all current happenings in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to have some background information for posts like these. I follow your blog from India. It is not always possible to be aware of all current happenings in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayHey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/2012/09/28/what-apple-and-maybe-you-too-can-learn-from-the-nfl-fumble/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>SayHey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jack-and-suzy-welch/?p=191#comment-884</guid>
		<description>The aggravated customers never stopped watching the product - the whole assault on the replacement referees was a media pro-union campaign. You would think that prior to this referees never made bad calls - which certainly was not the case. Not that the replacements disproportionately made bad calls - in fact the manufactured storm over the end of the Packers-Seahawks game was just that - manufactured. With simultaneous possession of the ball, it goes to the offensive player under the rules - was it a close call, a judgment call? - yes - and by definition those are controversial. And, BTW, what were the main issues in this dispute? - the referees wanted to hold on to a legacy pension plan instead of a 401K (well, welcome to the rest of America)and they opposed the NFL hiring more regular referees - just another attempt to keep all the work to themselves - not exactly idealism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aggravated customers never stopped watching the product &#8211; the whole assault on the replacement referees was a media pro-union campaign. You would think that prior to this referees never made bad calls &#8211; which certainly was not the case. Not that the replacements disproportionately made bad calls &#8211; in fact the manufactured storm over the end of the Packers-Seahawks game was just that &#8211; manufactured. With simultaneous possession of the ball, it goes to the offensive player under the rules &#8211; was it a close call, a judgment call? &#8211; yes &#8211; and by definition those are controversial. And, BTW, what were the main issues in this dispute? &#8211; the referees wanted to hold on to a legacy pension plan instead of a 401K (well, welcome to the rest of America)and they opposed the NFL hiring more regular referees &#8211; just another attempt to keep all the work to themselves &#8211; not exactly idealism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
