<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The press critics from Foggy Bottom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/22/the-press-critics-from-foggy-bottom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/22/the-press-critics-from-foggy-bottom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eideard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/22/the-press-critics-from-foggy-bottom/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Eideard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=36#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Only 2 copouts.  Pretty amazing for a nation that accepts managed news on behalf of everyone from coal producers to credit cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 2 copouts.  Pretty amazing for a nation that accepts managed news on behalf of everyone from coal producers to credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewsLady</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/22/the-press-critics-from-foggy-bottom/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>NewsLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 01:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=36#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Snicker all you want, but I&#039;m a news person, and I don&#039;t think the State Department did anything wrong. They can sound off to the press just like you or anyone can. If Al Jazeera chose to listen to them, perhaps it&#039;s a sign that they are becoming aware of their own considerable shortcomings as a purported news organization. Someone has to show them the way, and it doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s western reporters or the State Department. They need help, bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snicker all you want, but I&#8217;m a news person, and I don&#8217;t think the State Department did anything wrong. They can sound off to the press just like you or anyone can. If Al Jazeera chose to listen to them, perhaps it&#8217;s a sign that they are becoming aware of their own considerable shortcomings as a purported news organization. Someone has to show them the way, and it doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s western reporters or the State Department. They need help, bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptiffany</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/09/22/the-press-critics-from-foggy-bottom/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>ptiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=36#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Zzzzzzz.

Is this supposed to be news?  The United States has been monitoring, critiquing and influencing (in a myriad of ways) foreign broadcasts for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zzzzzzz.</p>
<p>Is this supposed to be news?  The United States has been monitoring, critiquing and influencing (in a myriad of ways) foreign broadcasts for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
