<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggy Monday: McGinniss&#8217;s anonymous sources; Netflix switcheroo; ask an expert; FOIA turnaround.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/10/bloggy-monday-mcginnisss-anonymous-sources-netflix-switcheroo-ask-an-expert-foia-turnaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/10/bloggy-monday-mcginnisss-anonymous-sources-netflix-switcheroo-ask-an-expert-foia-turnaround/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OlivesDad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/10/bloggy-monday-mcginnisss-anonymous-sources-netflix-switcheroo-ask-an-expert-foia-turnaround/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>OlivesDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=143#comment-170</guid>
		<description>If I were you, Jack, I&#039;d fact-check to see if maybe McGinnis was monkeyfishing up there in Cook Inlet with Sarah and Todd.  You are the last person on the planet I would think would bother to keep count of anonymous references in a piece. Are you OCD...or just previously burned?

And Jack....did you actually say this: &quot;Also, on-the
-record quotations are easier to verify than anonymous ones.&quot;?  I&#039;m going to write that one down.  Great insight. There&#039;s no foolin&#039; you, Jack. You da pro! You betcha.

Jack Shaffer analyzing Palin palaver! Heady stuff. Reuters sure is getting its investment back!  

Must you go on?  Please don&#039;t on my account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were you, Jack, I&#8217;d fact-check to see if maybe McGinnis was monkeyfishing up there in Cook Inlet with Sarah and Todd.  You are the last person on the planet I would think would bother to keep count of anonymous references in a piece. Are you OCD&#8230;or just previously burned?</p>
<p>And Jack&#8230;.did you actually say this: &#8220;Also, on-the<br />
-record quotations are easier to verify than anonymous ones.&#8221;?  I&#8217;m going to write that one down.  Great insight. There&#8217;s no foolin&#8217; you, Jack. You da pro! You betcha.</p>
<p>Jack Shaffer analyzing Palin palaver! Heady stuff. Reuters sure is getting its investment back!  </p>
<p>Must you go on?  Please don&#8217;t on my account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
