Comments on: Murdoch’s latest scandal http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/ Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:54:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: LEEDAP http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/#comment-181 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:06:28 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=152#comment-181 This seems especially problematic since the name sake of the Wall Street Journal Europe could be implicated by association as the previous comments seem to indicate. Could this actually be happening at the WSJ? I doubt it, but I’m not sure. In any event, Jack Shafer’s analysis and writing style are top notch. I just hope there’s more substantive comments to follow.

]]>
By: NobleKin http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/#comment-179 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:22:55 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=152#comment-179 NewsCorp = FoxNews = WallStreetJournal = Greed = Corruption = Political Propaganda = War on Democracy & Regulated Capitalism = Chaos/Anger/Fear = Leverage for a NeoCon Christian Fascist (Republican) takeover? = the new American Reality?

]]>
By: bitterweed http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/#comment-176 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:13:12 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=152#comment-176 Latest scandal? Big deal compared to what Reuters and the rest are under reporting that Obama and his cronies have done and are doing..

]]>
By: Ocala123456789 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/#comment-175 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:54:17 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=152#comment-175 i stopped my paid membership to WSJ when they bought it… they turned WSJ into a red neck haven… i bet if they sell it the price will be $1B 1/6th of their acquisition price… any organization owns Fox Network shows their ethical broadband… which is non-existent… murdoch needs to go…

]]>
By: OlivesDad http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2011/10/12/murdochs-latest-scandal/#comment-172 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:43:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=152#comment-172 Here is what is in the righthand column next to Jack’s blathering about useless journalistic opportunism… just above the SHELL OIL ad:

“Jack Shafer is a Reuters columnist. Any opinions expressed are his own.”

Of course is says that. Who else would claim them? Duh!

Shafer’s self described “unspecial section” doesn’t need advertising…it needs a hideout.

]]>