<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The spy who was undone by his email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/01/27/the-spy-who-was-undone-by-his-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/01/27/the-spy-who-was-undone-by-his-email/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ_resident</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/01/27/the-spy-who-was-undone-by-his-email/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ_resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=569#comment-906</guid>
		<description>&quot;Journalist A really went off the reservation by sharing Covert Officer A’s identity with the defense investigators in Guantánamo.&quot;  

All this talk by the author of &quot;parlor games&quot; (how effete), and yet he expresses precious little curiosity as to WHY a &quot;journalist&quot; would HIMSELF become an informant, personally passing along the identity of a CIA officer to a terrorist&#039;s lawyer.  To prove my point, could you imagine for a moment ANY modern journalist conveying information in the OPPOSITE direction?  Of course not.

The reason Journolist A (sic) did this should be self-evident, but for those new to American politics, let me educate: our press corps is infested from top to bottom with America-hating LIBERALS.  By dismissing the issue of the journalist&#039;s treachery by simply declaring him &quot;off the reservation&quot;, the author of this piece, Jack Shafer, just does his part to obfuscate and distract.  

A pox on your profession!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Journalist A really went off the reservation by sharing Covert Officer A’s identity with the defense investigators in Guantánamo.&#8221;  </p>
<p>All this talk by the author of &#8220;parlor games&#8221; (how effete), and yet he expresses precious little curiosity as to WHY a &#8220;journalist&#8221; would HIMSELF become an informant, personally passing along the identity of a CIA officer to a terrorist&#8217;s lawyer.  To prove my point, could you imagine for a moment ANY modern journalist conveying information in the OPPOSITE direction?  Of course not.</p>
<p>The reason Journolist A (sic) did this should be self-evident, but for those new to American politics, let me educate: our press corps is infested from top to bottom with America-hating LIBERALS.  By dismissing the issue of the journalist&#8217;s treachery by simply declaring him &#8220;off the reservation&#8221;, the author of this piece, Jack Shafer, just does his part to obfuscate and distract.  </p>
<p>A pox on your profession!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonJohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/2012/01/27/the-spy-who-was-undone-by-his-email/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>RonJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/jackshafer/?p=569#comment-803</guid>
		<description>How can you say that Journalist A was careless?  It&#039;s obvious that anyone who sends such specific information to a Guantanamo defense attorney has a specific motive/agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say that Journalist A was careless?  It&#8217;s obvious that anyone who sends such specific information to a Guantanamo defense attorney has a specific motive/agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
