Opinion

Jack Shafer

Heroin’s fictional comeback

By Jack Shafer
May 20, 2014

 

heroinFor a drug that has never ever gone away, heroin sure has a talent for coming back every couple of years. On Tuesday, the New York Times advanced the belief that a “flood of heroin” is flowing into New York City in a Page One story titled “New York Is a Hub in a Surging Heroin Trade.”

One difference between a conventional flood and a heroin flood is that a conventional is easier to measure: Plant a tall pole next to the body of water you’re observing, mark the pole with hash-marks in feet or meters, and record the rising water levels. But no such simple technology exists to accurately measure the flow of heroin into or out of a city. To use rising seizure statistics to estimate a surge in the heroin trade is like drawing a bath, stepping into it, and declaring that a flood has ravaged your tub.

The government statistics the Times cites sound impressive. “The amount of heroin seized in investigations involving the city’s special narcotics prosecutor has already surpassed last year’s totals, and is higher than any year going back to 1991,” the paper declares. In the first four months of 2014, we’re told, the city’s special narcotics prosecutor has recorded the seizure of 288 pounds of heroin, which does not include everyday seizures on the streets.

While 288 pounds of heroin over four months sounds like a staggering stash, how big is it really? In 1997, authorities seized 1,200 pounds of heroin in a Hayward, Calif., warehouse. In 1993, the Times reported the single seizure of 424 pounds of heroin (packed into five suitcases) in a Manhattan apartment tower. In 1989, federal agents and New York police confiscated 820 pounds of heroin in Flushing, Queens, in just one raid. The year before, Bangkok customs officials discovered 2,822 pounds of heroin on a New York-bound freighter, just before it sailed.

But according to a Nexis search, none of these substantial seizures elicited heroin-flood warnings from the Times.

poppyAgain, how staggered should we be by a 288-pound seizure? Based on a rule-of-thumb formula published by the Times in 1993, 288 pounds might have sated the city’s heroin appetite for about three weeks. Of course, this is just an estimate as heroin users neither submit to a census nor share consumption details with authorities. The real number could be twice or half that amount. Nobody knows. As likely as not, the average heroin importer’s business plan factors in the occasional seizure and makes distributional adjustments when police make what they consider to be a “big” bust.

A rise in drug seizures can’t be taken as a reliable marker of an increased supply of drugs for several reasons. Record seizures might indicate good luck on the part of police, and low seizures might indicate bad luck. A change in figures might indicate an increase or decrease in drug enforcement man-hours or know-how, or a change in smuggler tactics. In 1997, federal agencies were befuddled when seizures of cocaine and heroin dropped 12 percent and 16 percent respectively, despite an increase in interdiction efforts. The Chicago Tribune let unnamed government sources speculate that the cause might be smugglers taking new routes to evade detection. In other words, a decline in seizures was assumed to indicate an increase (or no change) in the amount smuggled.

If you step outside the micro of the New York City heroin market and into the macro of the world market, the 288 pounds seized in New York shrinks into insignificance. In 2008, a United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime report estimated world heroin consumption in 2008 at 340 metric tons of heroin (750,000 pounds) and seizures at 90 to 110 metric tons (200,000 to 242,000 pounds). The U.N. also pegged U.S. and Canada annual consumption of heroin at about 22 metric tons. If you put any faith in these official numbers, the 288 pounds stored in New York evidence lockers look more like a heroin trickle than a flood.

What’s driving the Times coverage, of course, is the national rise in drug-related deaths over the past two decades, about which I intend to write more. But for now, leave your galoshes in the closet. Reports of a New York heroin flood are greatly exaggerated.

******

Send drug stories to Shafer.Reuters@gmail.com. My Twitter feed is now and has always been straight edge. Sign up for email notifications of new Shafer columns (and other occasional announcements). Subscribe to this RSS feed for new Shafer columns.

PHOTOS: An undated handout picture shows 127 pounds of heroin seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in Laredo, Texas.  REUTERS/Public Affairs office of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection office/Handout 

An Afghan man works on a poppy field in Jalalabad province April 17, 2014. REUTERS/ Parwiz 

Comments
7 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Use has gone up because people who got addicted to pain killers can’t afford the pills any more and heroine is cheaper. People are born with neuro-receptors that are specific for the poppy plant. Did you know that? Do you know who the biggest poppy dealer on earth is? We need to legalize poppy flowers, and the coca plant as well as marijuana. These are called “control” substances, and yes if you really look into the poppy wars, you will see what I mean. Now they want to control the “water” as well. L.

Posted by 2Borknot2B | Report as abusive
 

Hmmm, ten years in Afghanistan…. Afghanistan is the largest produce of poppies… billions in cash distributed.. soldiers returning….connections established…

I think our failed war in Afghanistan may have had some influence in the heroin trade in the US

Posted by tmc | Report as abusive
 

This author is ignorant and misinformed. The prescription drug epidemic, namely opiate-derived painkillers like vicodin, percocet, oxycontin, etc. are what is contributing significantly to the rise in heroin addiction. People start out with a prescription from their doctor, end up abusing it and getting addicted, then they start buying the pills off the street, and then when that becomes to expensive they switch over heroin to feed their opiate habit. This transition happens time and time again, I live in wealthy community on Long Island and I have witnessed it first-hand. If you need more facts to substantiate this, look here: In 2012 and 2013 there were more than 220 overdose deaths due to heroin, the most ever recorded. The alarm being raised is well-deserved.

Posted by Robert_Stone | Report as abusive
 

“Use has gone up because people who got addicted to pain killers can’t afford the pills any more and heroine is cheaper.”

But even that is an old story. NYT and the New Yorker were doing stories about Plano, TX and the “New heroin boom” of the oxycontin middle class… 15 years ago. It almost seems like the media keeps WANTING a new heroin boom. Truth is, it’s been a thing since the 1800′s in America. It peaks and slows periodically, but it’s always here.

Posted by AlkalineState | Report as abusive
 

While a rise in drug seizures alone may not necessarily indicate an increase in drug supply, the lack of a correlation between supply and seizures hardly supports the conclusion that reports of a flood of heroin in NYC “are greatly exaggerated”. Instead, what we have are several facts, of which the increased amount of seized heroin is one, which together offer more support for arguing that the supply (and perhaps use) of heroin in NYC is probably increasing, while the argument that such claims are exaggerated does not appear to have any support whatsoever.

Posted by NoVaCRE | Report as abusive
 

Across Europe/WestAsia its been BIG the last 5-10 years. Didnt make the news but plenty dying.

Posted by diegoorlandi | Report as abusive
 

When Reagan and Bush the elder warned us of crack cocaine, it wasn’t really a warning, it was an advertisement. This new heroin epidemic is exactly the same. They tell us that there is a bunch of heroin on the street, it’s pure and cheap. It comes from afghanistan where our soldiers protect the crops from the taliban. It’s supposed to raise the awareness of americans to the easy access to heroin, not discourage them from use. It’s largely assumed that liberals will gravitate to it’s use, which will weaken them and make them easier to control. Of course there is methamphetimine which is very addictive to the standard right wingers, which serves to balance this out a bit. I think we need to make meth more available and cheap and pure for the constituency of the right wing.

Posted by brotherkenny4 | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •