James Pethokoukis

Politics and policy from inside Washington

5 reasons why Obama will hike middle-class taxes

August 4, 2009

JamesPethokoukiscrop.jpgC’mon, how about some Walter Mondalesque candor from the Obama White House on taxes? Yes, yes, it was 25 years ago this summer that the Democratic presidential candidate self-immolated on the issue at his party’s convention in San Francisco. But surely Americans have become more urbane and sophisticated since then as to what makes for sound economic policy, oui?

[Find out five ways to boost the economy and create jobs]

Nope. If you had any doubt that higher taxes are still poisonous policy in center-right America, all you had to do was listen to White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs yesterday. He briskly and precisely walked back the White House from the ambiguous statements made by Tim Geithner and Larry Summers on the Sunday chat shows. “I am reiterating the president’s clear commitment in the clearest terms possible that he’s not raising taxes on those who make less than $250,000 a year,” Gibbs said.

But what’s so clear, Mr. Gibbs? “Commitment” in this context is a schemer’s word, the much-weaker-yet-more-conniving sibling of “guarantee.” Did Broadway Joe express a mushy “clear commitment” to winning the 1969 Super Bowl? Clearly not. In any event, feel free to ignore Gibbs or any other White Housespinmeister who gives the impression that President Obama raising middle-class taxes would be the equivalent of playing himself in a Hollywood biopic — so unlikely as to be fanciful. It’s not and here’s why it will happen eventually:

1) Obama knows the budget math doesn’t work. Put aside today’s budget mess. It’s gospel among center-left wonks (the kind of folks who give Obama economic advice) that structural government spending as a percentage of GDP is headed sharply higher over the long term because of entitlements — and there’s little that can be done about it. The ratio has been around 20 percent or so the past few decades, and number crunchers forecast a sharp rise to 25 percent (best case scenario) to 30 percent (worst case) of GDP over the next few decades. Tax revenues typically hover around 18 percent of GDP. That gap — representing $500 billion to $1 trillion a year — will need to be closed or else cause economic chaos. The possible answers: a) less spending, b) higher tax revenues from higher growth, or c) higher tax revenues from higher rates on the non-wealthy. Oh, and the wonks are convinced “a” is a political impossibility and “b” an economic one. They’re wrong, but that’s what they think.

[See if Obama's big economic gamble is paying off]

2) Obama seems to prefer tax hikes to spending cuts. Reduced future healthcare spending needs to be a huge part of the budget solution, and ObamaCare doesn’t make the grade at this point. Right now the various Obamacrat plans actually make things worse by failing to “bend the curve.” What’s more, Obama has proposed nothing as president to make Social Security solvent. And during the campaign, his preferred fix was higher payroll taxes rather than commonsense measures like extending the retirement age or changing how benefits are calculated. Of course, Obama has also proposed raising income, investment, corporate and energy taxes. Cut spending or raise taxes – forObama it’s an easy pick, unfortunately.

3) Obama has already tried raising taxes. Let’s, for the sake of argument, ignore the increased federal cigarette tax that would certainly seem to be a violation of Obama’s tax pledge. Call it a misdemeanor offense. But what about his cap-and-trade proposal, a de facto energy tax on everyone? Before the plan was modified in the House, the White House expected the plan to bring in some $80 billion a year from 2012 to 2019 by auctioning off carbon emission permits (probably to pay for healthcare reform). And making energy more costly is as about as broad-based a tax as you can get.

[Find out how healthcare taxes would affect you]

4) Obama’s advisers are for higher taxes. Let’s review, for example, what White House economic adviser and guru Larry Summers said on Sunday about tax hikes: “There is a lot that can happen over time. It is never a good idea to absolutely rule things out no matter what.” Indeed, Summers won’t rule it out because he thinks all the Bush tax cuts need to go, not just the ones for so-called rich folks. Here is Summers from earlier this year on Meet the Press when he put no qualifiers on letting the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2010: “I don’t think there’s any question they have to be repealed. The country can’t afford them for the long run. … They can’t be, they can’t be part of the long-run budget picture.” Not for anyone, it seems.

5) Obama doesn’t seem to think high taxes are harmful. Think about this: Not only was the top income tax rate a stratospheric 70 percent when President Reagan took office in1981, the tax code was not indexed to inflation. A lethal combo for economic growth. But here’s what Obama wrote about the Reagan tax cuts in The Audacity of Hope: “The high marginal tax rates that existed when Reagan took office may not have curbed incentives to work or invest, but they did distort investment decisions — and did lead to the wasteful industry of setting up tax shelters.” That’s it! Heavens, if Obama doesn’t think the pre-Reagan tax code wasn’t a disincentive to working, saving and investing, is there any tax system that he would find anti-growth?

Bottom line: The belief in the need for higher, European-style taxes (like a VAT) fills the policy cloud that surrounds Obama. It’s hard to overstate this. It’s right up there with global warming. Obama knows he faces a looming fiscal crisis and higher taxes will be his weapon of choice. To paraphrase Mondale, “Obama will raise middle-class taxes. He won’t tell you (yet). I just did.

Comments

>>are the top 5% paying enough back to the system they are so good at profiting from?Considering those 5% pay the vast majority of income taxes, and the bottom 50% pay almost none, then yes, that top group IS paying enough back into the system.And no, I’m not one of them!

Posted by Jim | Report as abusive
 

So all of Obama’s advisors and Obama wants to raise taxes.Well why don’t we just all vote that everyone receiving a paycheck including the president and Mrs. Obama start paying the taxes that all of us have to pay and maybe they will all think twice in spending and taxing us all.That will definitely get everyone thinking.

Posted by JANIE RAPER | Report as abusive
 

And Al Gore won a Nobel also. Whoopie doo. I can buy one at the Mexican Pawn shop in Baytown. Deosn’t make squat when you tell me I have to pay FOR YOU. Robin Hood Liberal with “feel good” legislation, or “I Feel A Legacy”. Just trying to make a name at someone elses expense.By the way, I ate the polar bear so it wouldn’t drown.MMMMMMMMMMM

Posted by Conservative | Report as abusive
 

Taxes are only one part of the equation.Considering that health care is rising at 2-3 times the rate of inflation and wages, and that wages are decreasing for many people as more corporations use globalization to their advantage, then it won’t be very long before health insurance will consume a major portion of income anyway. So those that can afford health insurance and uninsured healthcare will be paying enormous amounts while more and more people go uncovered, raising rates even more.So now tell me would you rather pay 15% in taxes and another 40% in health care costs out of your gross income or 40% or less in total as taxes for all government services including a single payer health system? Raising taxes while offsetting the other costs that are killing doesn’t seem like a bad way to go.When you compare tax rates of the US versus the UK or elsewhere, you do have to consider all the extra charges we pay as Americans for the privatized services that our government doesn’t provide.This isn’t about the bogeyman of socialised medicine. It’s about how we’re going to give all of our citizens accesses to health care as a basic right.Most people seem to like the way Medicare works, but they seem to have a real problem with that same model being applied to everyone at all ages.

Posted by mike | Report as abusive
 

PS I expect that President Obama will soon say that when he said no taxes on less than “250,000 dollars” he really meant 250,000 _Hong Kong_ dollars.

Posted by Jim | Report as abusive
 

And on to the “Regulation” of banks…. Didn’t the Facist Mussolini start with the auto industry and banks? I smell a big fat ElitisT among us……. God thing the Yanks are coming back to fight the war at home.

Posted by Conservative | Report as abusive
 

Mike,I don’t know where you live, but if I go to the ER I have the basic right to healthcare, I just have to wait in line behind all of the illegal immigrants, social dregs, and others that got there first. Guess what, it doesn’t change under the Gov plan no matter how much money you throw at it. Doctors will not work for free, and neither will you. With gov healthcare you will still wait in line for mediocre services. Ever serve in the Armed Forces? Ever have to go on post and get your teeth pulled? It’s a far cry from the Mayo Clinic pal.

Posted by Conservative | Report as abusive
 

the American people are sick and tried of hearing the left and the right don’t you guys get it. I’m a 22 year old educated young African-American and our economy has been through in a lack of finding better words to phrase through hell and you guys want to talk about who is wrong and who is right. I want our economy to be better and you know what Obama is doing a helluva of a job with what the pervoius president Bush missed up upon.Think about that one you inconsiderate know at all’s.

 

Pethokoukis’ inane ravings are so unconnected unconnected to reality that he must be sponsored by FOX news. Idea #1 alone is so full of errors that I don’t have time to examine the rest. The last time government spending as a percent of GDP was “around 20 percent or so”? Around 1929 or so, not the past few decades. “That gap” that needs to be closed or else cause economic chaos? I guess he’s trying to talk about the deficit, but he’s not okay with unfamiliar terms. Deficit spending is either (a) a fact of government policy for the past few decades or so, regardless of administration, and is okay because government macrobudgets don’t operate like Pethokoukis’ wallet microbudget or (b) the great liberal evil because it’s too hard to understand “a” and nobody explains it on tv. Oh, and the wonks are convinced that it must be “c”: I don’t know and I don’t really care, but I just like to be angry and blog. Pethokoukis: you should have paid more attention in school.

Posted by Frank | Report as abusive
 

To the fools who think the top 5% of Americans that earn over $250,000 “the richies” believe that we need to pay more than the rest of you – I ask you to ponder this – The top 5% of American earners pay for 88% of all taxes collected (us treasury web site). Top 5% covering 88% of all taxes collected and you want more, hom much more should they pay… Will you liberal/socialists be happy when the top 5% pay 100%.You should be ashamed to be so lazy and pass so much of the Obama “Change Burden” onto a select few

Posted by Bob Cooke | Report as abusive
 

But the again, I suppose I shouldn’t have wasted my time writing all of that out. The people who understand what I said already agree.

Posted by Frank | Report as abusive
 

How about lets just take our hard-earned money, take what we need to survive (ramen noodles are good, and we need little more than a cardboard box for shelter), then give the rest of it to government bureaucrats so that they can recycle it back to us (after going through 10 different levels of people, all getting GS-13 or higher paychecks) to pay for our food and shelter!Or, we could be rational human beings (are there any of those left in this country?) and revert back to the “Protestant” Work Ethic that worked so well for our fore-fathers and actually work rather than wait for government handouts.I’m not in the top tier of payment (I’m barely on the bottom tier, full-time summer job, in college where I have hefty student loans), but I don’t think that it is quite fair to take money from the people who worked for it (or are famous, take your pick), and make them have to live at a standard less than their income just because the people in government are jealous of their success in the private sector… Get a life, politicians, and just let people get on with their lives without worrying about how they are going to pay their bills even with a Master’s degree or higher…And about those in the higher brackets: there is a debt to society, but its not to the government… Charities are much more efficient and actually accomplish more.

Posted by Marei | Report as abusive
 

I think nobody want tax increase, but with the huge blossoming of governement debt to expect, there is no choice for any politician. There is no federal asset that can be sold to compensate this financial black hole. Selling the Navy?? Offices? AIG? GM? No governement is good at making money, just good taking it from our pockets.

Posted by Geoffrey | Report as abusive
 

Reagan cut taxes hoping that govt spending would be cut (“starve the beast”). It didn’t work, as Congress embraced deficit spending to deliver high levels of services at low tax rates.Obama has ratcheted spending from 21% of GDP to 28% of GDP. While this may be defensible if it were a short term boost to recap the banks and invest in infrastructure, much of it is permanant spending designed to grow over time.Plus, we get higher spending as the Boomers retire on entitlements.All of this is leading to higher taxes – 70% marginal rates, higher caps on payroll taxes (real job killers), a VAT tax, much higher investment taxes, etc.I don’t really recall this debate in the 2008 election. It is being done with misdirection and stealth.

Posted by John Boy | Report as abusive
 

Americans need to wise up and vote smarter. There was a much better choice for our times in Ron Paul. Let’s hope he’ll run again so Americans get a second chance to get it right.

Posted by jason | Report as abusive
 

Wow what a whiny Right-Wing pile of drivel. It seems that all Republicans can do these days is whine. So useless.

Posted by Chris | Report as abusive
 

Unbelievable. Middle class, what middle class! The middle class has been eliminated by corporate greed and the unethical practices of the banking industry. Wages have been stagnant for over 8 years and was not due to paying higher taxes. Corporations are rewarding only their top executives, not their workers. Health care costs have risen over 53% over the last few years and we should be worried about paying higher taxes! Come on! At least Obama is addressing all these tough issues facing our country and not off clearing brush, vacationing at his ranch.

Posted by Michele | Report as abusive
 

Obamacrat? Obamacare? I’m supposed to take you seriously now?Reuters must be scrapping the barrel for bloggers. A higher marginal tax rate is disincentive to work? lol What garbage! So, if I’m making $250,000 /yr, its simply not worth it to try to earn that $250,001st dollar because I keep less of it after taxes than the previous 250k? Nonsense. This is such a tired OLD argument.Of course, most people with that income aren’t exactly waiters trying to turn tables faster (iotw- work harder)… nor would you want them to be (i.e. Doctor’s, Lawyers, CEOs). Do you think Joe CEO making 2 mil a year seriously thinks – “man, I’m just gonna slack off now, half of every new dollar I earn at this point goes to the government.” lol Riiiigght.It always makes me laugh to read these comments from all the Joe Average’s out there that think taxes on the wealthy hurt them. The Bush Tax cuts were a boon to the wealthy and we had 8 years marked by increased economic inequality, increased concentration of wealth, and stagnant middle class wages. Keep on drinkin’ the cool aid that those tax cuts worked for you. lol

Posted by Brad | Report as abusive
 

The problem with being worried about raising taxes is like treating a symptom of the flu and not lying in bed to get healty. Its clear the government is and has been spending more than we have, and you can only cut the budget so far before the society can’t function, the only thing left is to raise taxes. I simply hope that our leaders are smart enough to use the money wisely, and if they aren’t – I’m voting for someone else. We all had a part in letting the previous spending get out of hand.

Posted by Andy | Report as abusive
 

The rich pay less taxes now than when Reagan was president. The argument that less taxes will improve the economy runs out of steam when no one pays any taxes. There is a limit. The rich should pay their share after all they have 90% of the wealth of this country in their pocket. Class warfare is about to start. Watch out. Everyone knows where the rich people live, and their entire families too. The wealth will be redistributed one way or another. Distribution by taxes is the peaceful way. There are other ways.

Posted by g1v3up | Report as abusive
 

Rather than blast the author, think about what he is saying.Everything that the Democrat-controlled Congress has proposed since Mr. Obama has taken office is going to lead, not only to higher taxes, but a higher cost of living.Whether it is cap and trade, health care reform, or the so-called stimulus plan, these programs mean higher taxes or a higher cost of living, or both!This points out just one of Mr. Obama’s many flaws: he promotes legislation that he readily admits he hasn’t read. Is that leadership?No, it isn’t.It’s mainly the “Chicago way” of conducting politics transplanted to Washington. In Chicago, the pols ignore the facts and strong-arm their party to compliance!We don’t need Al Capone (a.k.a. Mr. Obama) running our country.I hate to ask it, but, how’s that “hope and change” working for you?

Posted by Skip | Report as abusive
 

raise taxes on the “rich” and make healthcare more expensive for employers through mandates and surcharges and the “rich” and employers (often one and the same) will pass those costs on to the “middle class” and “poor” through increased prices, decreased production (i.e., less inventory – in other words, shortages) and job cuts. So, when you’re making $50,000 a year and your boss’ expenses just went up 12% and you either lose your job or have your wages frozen, good luck trying to make ends meet when all the goods and services you need have also increased in price.Furthermore, after O’s great healthcare fix, how many doctors will there be in 10 years? Why be a doctor? Why drop $200,000 in education expenses? Why be exposed to massive potential liability through lawsuits? If your reward is now reduced (as it would certainly be since the govt will cap costs) but your risk is still high, why would anyone with enough brains to be a doctor actually do it? If, after taxes, that doctor is no better off than your average middle class worker, why deal with all the bull? Clock in, clock out, go home. Let someone else deal with the headache. And that, in a nutshell, is what happens to all careers and all fields under socialism, which is why it only has a two to three generation shelf life. But, hey, don’t take my word for it. Wait a few years.

Posted by John Galt | Report as abusive
 

We shouldn’t be asking, “Why should the successful be punished”. The core question is: “what should a government provide?” As Ben Franklin said, ” A government that is big enough to give you everything you need is big enough to take everything you have.”If we can agree on what the government should legitimately be providing and what the private sector should be providing than we can begin to assess what are reasonable costs and taxes. (Infrastructure? Healthcare? Military Defense? Law Enforcement? Banking? Requlatory Oversight? Auto manufacturing? Environmental Regs based on disputed theories?) Whether the government provides a service should be based on three things:- Is it a legitimate role of government?- Is it more efficiently provided by the government than the private sector?- Does it benefit society at large sufficiently to justify taxing the general populace? (I.E. should the childless be expected to pay for children’s education?)Most of you wanting the ‘richies’ to pay for more services don’t understand the work, sacrifice and risk the majority of the rich go through to make it.They made hard choices that others weren’t willing to make and generate income for a lot of other folks in the process.Easy to say take their money to pay. But, why not raise taxes on everybody? If these programs are so great, and they are legitimate expenses/functions of the government- why shouldn’t everyone be bearing the costs more directly? Maybe if everyone’s taxes went up significantly people would take a closer look at what our government is buying and demand greater fiscal accountability.I would never go into business with someone where I put up 90% of the money and give them control of the company. But that’s what we’ve done. The majority of the citizens contributing the least are forcing the minority to bear the burden to provide more and more government services. It’s now to the point where Repubs & Dems shield their business buddies from the consequences of bad decisions. They make the folks who made good decisions bear the costs of their competitors who were foolish. All from this attitude that it’s ok for the majority to take the miniority’s money. We can always force the ‘richies’ to pay because we can rationalize what we consider fair for them to hold onto out of what they’ve created, vice considering what a government should be provide that justifies taking property.I’ll leave you with two quotes:”Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” –Benjamin Franklin”The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of “liberalism”, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” …”I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.” 1944, Norman Mattoon Thomas, 6 time Socialist Party Presidential Candidate.

Posted by styrgwillidar | Report as abusive
 

Lib MBA,You are just proof that you can go to school for a very long time and not learn anything-just like our naive President. You should ask for your money back.Nobel prizes go to anti-American left wing nuts like Paul Krugman, Jimmy Carter and Yassar Arafat.Art Laffer doesn’t even take credit for the curve. He was just illustrating a basic economic truth. But let’s prove it: we’ll just take 100% of YOUR income. You’re not even sharp enough to differentiate between taxes and tax RATES.

Posted by Pat Duggan | Report as abusive
 

Let me see now, Obama is a Democrat, Democrats have ruined the State of California, where I live, in spite of the fact that we have among the highest taxes in the U.S. Now they are fighting Governor Schwarzenegger to tax the citizens more. That’s MY REASON FOR WHY OBAMA WILL PROBABLY HIKE TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS. HE’S A DEMOCRAT. CASE CLOSED.P.S. This emphatically does not mean I’m endorsing the Republican Party, which is as corrupt to the core, as are the Democrats. It’s just that the Democrats make a habit of trying to screw the middle class the first chance they get. Like the Republicans, they never seem to bother the rich.

Posted by Bobby | Report as abusive
 

P.S. I forgot to add in my last post, why doesn’t Obama tax Hank Paulsen, Goldman Sachs, and the rest of the scum on Wall Street who make hundreds of billions of dollars shuffling paper around and gambling with Americans money.(OPM) No, he won’t do that.

Posted by Bobby | Report as abusive
 

Brad,Don’t forget that the increase in taxes affects everyone who puts money at risk trying to make more money. It’s not the CEOs that are the issue. The CEOs income is a sure thing, he doesn’t have an incentive to turn down income- but he’s not risking anything to get more.It’s the venture captitalists, small business owners, and investors that are the concern. And yes. Increasing the tax rates discourages risk taking. The question is, what rate is the break point? At a 70% tax rate, there’s not much incentive to risk your own money just to give Uncle Sam the majority of the profit. At 5% there’s a huge incentive to take the risk since you’ll get the vast majority of the profit. But, will they still take the risk at 10%, 20%, 45%? Now throw in that the government wants them to take the risk for job creation, income taxes on the jobs, increased economic activity, improvements in local economies, worker benefits provided etc. All in additon to the potential for Federal Revenues.From a small business owner perspective, at what income tax rate will you be willing to use your house as collateral for a business loan for that great idea of yours, knowing that 80% of small businesses fail? Will you risk it if Uncle Sam will take 20% of your profit? How about 50%?For a venture capitalist, what profit do you need to make to risk your money? Again, most ventures will fail. When does it become not worth it to risk your money?Or the stock market. Should we raise capital gains? Given the volatility over the last few years, will you invest in companies via stocks if the government will take 60% of the gain? 15%? What’s the magic number? Remember, the government isn’t going to cover your losses. The government has an interest in the stock market doing well, not just to capitalize companies and spur economic activity, but also as a backstop to Social Security. That seniors will have income and resources available to make them less of a burden on the government.

Posted by styrgwillidar | Report as abusive
 

.You need to take the reward off of how much you own, and how much money you have. Take pride that you have a chance to participate in better living for all of man kind, not just yourself and those dearest to you.The hardest of the working citizens in this country don’t have a higher education, and they are responsible for feeding you, and keeping your habitat livable. Show some gratitude.

Posted by Jason Morris | Report as abusive
 

It will be easy for the Democrats to pull off.Step 1. Raise middle class taxes.Step 2. Blame the previous administration.Step 3. Sit back and bask in the applause.Think the voters will fall for it? Of course they will. After all, they fell for Obama.

Posted by Anon | Report as abusive
 

HELP STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION…….MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD:http://www.numbersusa.com/content/ learn/about/what-numbersusa-is-all-about .html

Posted by Mike | Report as abusive
 

The ‘innovative’ idea of a ‘pay for value / outcome’ pack came after the CBO had previously pointed out this health care reform wouldn’t work without ‘fundamental’ change in the out of date system. It is said that as much as 30 percent of all health-care spending in the U.S. -some $700 billion a year- may be wasted on tests and treatments that do not improve the health of the recipients, and this 700 billion dollars a year can cover a lot of uninsured people.The expected Benefits of this ‘innovative idea’ are as follows ;1. Meet the objective of revenue-neutral.Supporters of the agreement say it could save the Medicare System more than $100 billion a year and ‘improve’care, that means more than $1trillian over next decade, and virtually needs no other resources including tax on thewealthiest. Supposedly even the ‘conservative’ number of such savings might be able to meet the objective ofrevenue-neutral.2. Quality and affordability.If you are a physician, and your pay is dependant upon your patient’s outcome, you will most likely strive toprescribe the best medicine earlier in the process, let alone skipping the wasteful, unnecessary treatments.3. No intervention in decision-making.The innovative idea of ‘a pay for outcome’ will more likely prompt team approach and decision, as at Myo clinic.Under the ‘pay for outcome’ pack, for good reason, best practices as ‘recommendations’ would simply help themmake a better decision, and the government won’t still have to meddle in the final, actual decision-makingprocess as a non-expert.4. Speed up the introduction of IT SYSTEM.The pay for ‘Outcome’ pack is most likely to expedite the introduction of Health Care IT SYSTEM.The synergy effect of the combined Health Care IT & a pay for ‘outcome’ system may allow the clinicians to’correctly’ diagnose and effectively treat a patient earlier in the process so that it can measurably scale back thecrushing lawsuits and deter the excuse for unnecessary cares to make fortunes.5. Accelerate the progress in medical science, in return, it saves more cash.6. Settle the regional disparity.7. Reduce the emergency room visits & save immense costs.Public health insurance plans such as Medicare and Medicaid paid for more than 40 percent of U.S. emergencyroom visits in 2006, according to government figures released recently. Many experts say reducing these hospitalvisits would be an important way to lower the enormous, and growing, expense of U.S. health care.I share the opinion that unlike the insurer-friendly senate plan by ‘some’ members, only a strong public option will be capable of getting the premium inflation under control and saving the U.S in turbulence.To my knowledge, a dual system tends to deliver better results than a pure single payer system. Supposedly, to be or not to be might be up to the innovations like a pay for value program, otherwise, the forthcoming start-ups may fill the void with competitive deals. The competition based on ‘fair’ market value would be a beauty of true capitalism, not monopoly, an objective for anti-trust.Thank You !

Posted by HSR0601 | Report as abusive
 

Your article had made me to think twice or thrice to make comments.Now, everybody,especially from educated class,economists,social thinkers and those who interests on day today happenings in the world have to accept probable taxes on middle class Americans.If any social economy to grow,all these form of taxes are painful necessities and to be accepted for nation upswing

 

I’m already getting soaked by the AMT and make less than 250,000. So it really doesn’t matter to me. Since nobody will touch the AMT with a 10 foot pole, a raise in someone else’s taxes works as some perverse sort of fairness, and, hey misery loves company.

Posted by Jim | Report as abusive
 

Herr Obama is an IDIOT!

Posted by American Justice | Report as abusive
 

When will the Kool-Aid drinkers here hoping/wishing for higher taxes on the “rich” realize there aren’t enough rich to go around. YOUR taxes are going to go up to! The “rich”, who own the businesses you or your friends & family work for are going to pass on the higher taxes to YOU in the form of higher prices for their goods or services provided (ever manage a P&L?), or YOUR job will simply go away!It’s is simply amazing how this supposed intellect, who never ran a business nor had a real job, can be entrusted to run a Country just based on the fact he can read a teleprompter, and is cool. Ridiculous.

Posted by newman | Report as abusive
 

Some of the biggest proponents of the health care reform are people who have been in congress for over 25 years and think they that know better than the rest of us. If your congressman has been in office that long you can’t tell me somebody better hasn’t come along to replace him with? People like Rangle, Waxman, Frank need to go and get some fresh blood into Congress. Until that happens, nothing is going to change (same for the Republicans).

Posted by WiConservative | Report as abusive
 

The best thing for America at this time would be a presidential resignation. Let’s see this socialist bent stopped before the SS troops begin knocking on doors.

Posted by callmike2 | Report as abusive
 

Bryan from NYC said selfish WHITE liberals……Uhmm yea was that a race commit thrown out????? You need to recheck yourself before you start throwing race into this matter our president is black… I was reading the commits and many had great points but when I got to Bryan’s I just had to ask…… Take care all…

Posted by Tricia | Report as abusive
 

Pay to play. When a rising tide does not float all boats then a little intervention is needed. This is a social contract not socialism or liberalism. Yes you can live like a king in America…I don’t have to kiss your ring. Yes we dems are tax and spend types unlike the spend all you can borrow leave the bill for tommorow repugs. Repugs posture, threats have been made here to start a class war. If you were a good king you would not have anything to worry about…but no you have to act like a 3 or 12 year old. Money is like water in that the body can use only so much before it is returned to the system. If you kings don’t let it go the thirsty will take it anyway. James P is a REPUG-BOT.

Posted by DanO | Report as abusive
 

I am so glad to see that America is changing. It’s been smothered for far too long by the few power hungry trolls that have been in control for the last 200 years.Change!

Posted by John | Report as abusive
 

what do you expect of the president and his clique who never made a penny on their own and only spent someone else’s money? Also, there are $ power behind him that propelled him to the current position and continues manipulating his policies for their own gain … (fill in the blanks, since we can only run guesses at this time). I wonder who wants to ruin this country…

Posted by Horrified Reader | Report as abusive
 

This article is all speculation. Nice job scaring people James! Taxes on the middle class NO, Taxes on the rich YES. Obam has no reason to tax the middle class and every reason to tax the wealthy. Taxing the wealthy is much more likely!

Posted by george | Report as abusive
 

I seem to recall a strong America that had a top tax rate of 90% or so. Laffer curve can work with this but look at this: There were a few billionares and quite a few millionares, and some who hit it rich in spite of a tax rate not meant to punnish success but to keep financial success from becoming a base for taking the power of the electorate for itself. Unbridled, raw capitalism tanks periodically. Regulated (by simple tax rates) society is insulated from capitalists failures because enterprises stop accumulating wealth when it makes sense.Bring back a high top rate and we wont have to be concerned about BONUS-GATE or class warfare. However, to end the ridiculous class warfare debate/possibility a retroactive tax to 1998 or so might be in order. That way the richies can’t fund their own standing armies.Whew…problem solved. The poor looking for the government tit get the government zit while the rich looking for same have swiming pools filled with government milk. DO NOT BE FOOLED.

Posted by DanO | Report as abusive
 

More scary tactics of special interest slaves… what a nerd..

Posted by Carlos Romero | Report as abusive
 

Listen up folks — THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO MONEY! It only has OUR money which it redistributes poorly, inefficiently, and to the politicians own advantage at a pay scale greatly exceeding their worth compared to the private sector. When the government starts spending on real needs, efficiently, with integrity, at a pay scale commensurate with the rest of us, then perhaps we can discuss tax increases.

Posted by Cin Ick | Report as abusive
 

Hopefully the children of the posters on this board will get it because clearly very few of you do.Democrat=RepublicanRepublican=Democra tIf ANYONE on this comment board wants to debate with me on the subject I’d be happy to, for every one difference you provide I’ll provide you with ten similarities.

Posted by Michael Ham | Report as abusive
 

Mr. Pethokoukis wrote a lot of words, but failed to explain why deficit spending has to be curbed by raising taxes on those making less than $250,000. I wonder if he really believes that we can’t close the budget deficit simply by raising taxes on those that make over $250,000 a year.As far a cutting spending, it’s a no-brainer: Government spending needs to increase until growth returns. This is simple economics and it’s not like we don’t have a model to prove it. A little something called the Great Depression. Also a great model on why is it beneficial to raise taxes on the wealthy.I find it incredible that VAT is even mentioned as a possible Obama policy. VAT, or any type of sales tax, is a regressive policy (a greater tax burden on the poor as a percentage of income). Obama has very clearly stated that he supports a progressive tax policy (greater tax burdens on the rich). Is it the increase in cigarette taxes that makes Mr. Pethokoukis believe Obama wants VAT? It certainly is true that, on the face of it, the increase is regressive, but I’d argue that the disincentive to smoke would ultimately lead to long term savings for those affected by the tax. But, I guess I’m stretching here.Okay, Mr. Pethokoukis, I guess you are right. Obama is going to raise taxes on all middle class Americans through massive cigarette taxes. It seems there is no way to avoid Obama’s tax tyranny.

Posted by Kirk | Report as abusive
 

Since Canada has been criticized a few times here, let’s just ask why they are ahead in EVERY health indicator while spending much less per person when compared to the US? It’s not without its faults but contrary to the right-wing propaganda Canadians as a whole are very happy with their socialized health care system. As for taxes, I’m as against bloated gov’t bureaucracy and productivity disincentives as the next guy, but there must be some kind of “big picture” balance here. If you think that the growing income inequality isn’t a problem I suggest you are sorely mistaken.

Posted by Sheldon | Report as abusive
 

niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

 

Materialist Analysis of the Obama RegimePART 1: Abolishing Social Security and “Healthcare Overhaul”Obama is Nothing But a Right-Wing Black Being Provided ContantLEFT-COVER by Republicans and a Huge Capitalist Media Pump asObama Begins to Lose Credibility Among his Constituencies!How and Why the Demagogue OBama Was Elected President! SinceWatergate the Outcomes of All Presidential Elections have beenRigged in Advance By Agreement between the Candidates!The capitalist dictatorship of millionaires and billionaires required a Democrat to win the presidency in 2008 because it could not achieve its reactionary objectives with Bush and the Republicans who had very little credibility because of those very reactionary objectives. Obama was elected in order to ram down our throats the Fascist policies which Bush could not implement because Bush was opposed by all Democratic Party constituencies which form the bulk of the U.S. population and was the most hated and despised president in all U.S. history, followed closely by Ronald Reagan. The capitalist dictatorship calculates that because Obama campaigned as supposedly being “opposed to Bush” and that because he was able to get “elected” using such insultingly deceptive nebulous slogans such as “Change We Can Believe In” and “Yes We Can” and believe that Obama’s supporters are so stupid and so ignorant that they will not mind or not notice that his policies once in office are worse than those of George Bush! Obama’s policies are in fact far to the right of Bush and leave Bush in the dust! Since taking office Obama has reversed virtually all of his “anti-Bush” campaign promises with the exception of a few minor conciliatory gestures to his Democratic constituencies. Obama’s role is to string people along while carrying out policies which are a continuation of the “Bush” policies, which simply represent the one-way dynamic of capitalism. See below.Obama has continued all of the Bush Wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and has continued the U.S./NATO military exercises right on the border of Georgia and the build-up of the Georgian military in preparation for further provocations and yet another possible invasion of South Ossetia/Russia. In addition, Obama is conditioning the U.S. masses to accept the planned bombing of Iran by the U.S. Proxy, so-called “Israel,” despite the combined National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that Iran had ended its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and the fact that Iran has NOT enriched ANY of its uranium to bomb-grade level and the report that Iran had even ended its enrichment program entirely in May 2009! (Associated Press, August 25, 2009) The Iran “nuclear threat” is another false Bush-type “Weapons of Mass Destruction” pretext which will be used this time to bomb Iran! The most recent fabrication of “computer file evidence” against Iran is being used to try to pressure the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) just exactly like Bush did to pressure Mohamed ElBaradei to support the “Weapons of Mass Destruction” Big Lie against Iraq! (New York Times, August 26, 2009) ElBaradei refused to go along with Bush and so far does not support this most recent Bush/Obama rubbish. Obama, usually hides behind a solid wall of denial and has continued and even accelerated virtually all the Bush programs and policies, many of which were rejected outright when first proposed by Bush including the elimination of the FUNCTION of Social Security! See below.Note: Part II will include thorough analysis of the Economic Crisis, the U.S. Swine Flu Biological Warfare Program, the Final Stage of Capitalism: Permanent War and State Terrorism, the fraudulent so-called Mideast Peace Process, U.S./Russian relations, the Bush/Obama Wars and the continued use of torture by Obama despite all denials. Part II will also include more material on Provocations and the escalating attack on all social programs and public education at the elementary school and college levelFrom the advent of imperialism, which correlates approximately from the beginning of the twentieth century every U.S. presidential administration has been to the right of the one which preceded it, whether it has been Democratic or Republican. This is due to the one-way dynamic of capitalism-imperialism which leads inexorably to Fascism, barbarism and the end of civilization The only exceptions were the administrations of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who designed the New Deal and the two New Dealers who followed him: Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower. The New Deal came about only under the pressure of a million-strong Communist movement in the United States, which later disintegrated primarily because of the false and sabotaging leadership of Joseph Stalin, who was not actually a Communist, (See below) and because the U.S. government either crushed or took over the leadership of all “left” groups in the United States. Today The New Deal has been almost entirely demolished by the hardening capitalist dictatorship. Obama was elected in order to finish that demolition by first targeting Social Security where within 100 days of taking office he immediately and permanently abolished the yearly Social Security Cost-Of-Living Allowance, while simultaneously giving away 4.7 $trillion in Bank Bailouts (Associated Press, July 20, 2009), the real purpose of which was actually to DIVERT money away from social spending, thus beginning the process of terminating the primary function of Social Security: to keep older people alive! (See below.)The WorldviewToday we live in a world of nation states. All nation states are dictatorships of one class over another class, either the capitalist class over the working class or vice versa. (These are the only historically destined classes.) There is no “democracy” at the present time, not even for the capitalists themselves. Capitalism has a dynamic or development sequence of its own which at this point is almost entirely ONE-WAY. This one-way dynamic, or dialectic is largely independent of the wills of the capitalists and politicians and leads to a constantly hardening capitalist dictatorship finally to Fascism, barbarism and the end of civilization. Now, due to the beginning of the Runaway Greenhouse Effect, that means the end of all life on Earth! (See Materialist Analysis of Biofuels and the Runaway Greenhouse Effect on the Internet) Within the framework of the class dictatorship there can either be a hard or a soft dictatorship. The hard dictatorship of capitalism is known as Fascism, which has several historical variants. Today the United States is a military, bureaucratic police state, a form of capitalist dictatorship known as Rule by Decree (a form of Bonapartism), which is hardening and growing more naked by the day! Rule by Decree is a step short of Fascism. Actual Fascism requires the full and organized support of the petit-bourgeoisie (the middle class), the organization of armed gangs with specifically targeted scapegoats. The U.S. leaders are Fascists, including Obama, because they continually work to support the constantly hardening capitalist dictatorship. Capitalism is fundamentally based on war, mass murder and crime to steal new resources and new markets in order to increase private profits and today is in its Final Stage of Permanent War and State Terrorism. Politicians like Obama, and all capitalist politicians, rise to the top based on the extent which they express and further the one-way dynamic of capitalism. Communism is a stateless society, which has never been practiced and can never be practiced until capitalism is abolished worldwide beginning with a Socialist Revolution in its center—the United States.The steps required to carry out a Socialist Revolution in the United States are briefly outlined at the end of this Part I Analysis. Remember that the United States is NOT our country! It is the country of the capitalist dictatorship of billionaires and millionaires. WE JUST LIVE HERE! That means we must give no support to the U.S. military except in the case of MUTINY, when we give full support. See below. We are having class warfare waged against us as the U.S. capitalist dictatorship escalates its economic, biological and propaganda warfare against its own population and the entire world. The Working Class is NOT presently organized to fight back. Only a Socialist Revolution in the United States will make this OUR country!Given the choice, 95% of New Yorkers and the overwhelming majority of Americans agree that we need a new system based on human need not private profit. That system is Socialism and requires a Socialist Revolution in the United States, because capitalism cannot be turned into Socialism through “elections” or achieved through “election reform” such as “paper trails,” etc. or any other type of reform of capitalism. History proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt. Elections and “election reform” under capitalism is simply a ruse designed to permit the capitalist ownership and structure of the state to remain intact and ensure a continuation of the hardening capitalist dictatorship. “Democracy” under capitalism is simply a euphemism for capitalist dictatorship and enslavement. That is why the capitalist class must be expropriated of all of its wealth, all of which has been stolen from the Working Class through various forms of exploitation, super-exploitation and other crime. This is known as the expropriation of the expropriators and is possible only through a Socialist Revolution. The Socialist Revolution will extend globally almost simultaneously once it begins in the United States.The Socialist Revolution on the other hand does NOT involve a coup d’etat but relies primarily on patient explanation and the avoidance of provocations. Patient explanation and winning over the masses to support a new economic-political-social system involves a genuine grass roots organization. The 1917 October Russian Revolution did not take place until the Bolsheviks, the smallest political party after the February Revolution, had grown to win the support of 70% of Working Class and 30% of the peasantry, which included the all-important army which was already in MUTINY. Provocations on the other hand are invariably orchestrated and led by the capitalists themselves to both discredit the Working Class and lead it to take steps prematurely before there is the overwhelming popular support which is required to take state power. Patient explanation is necessary in order to achieve the popular support and organization necessary to end the dictatorship of billionaires and millionaires and establish a new system where everyone can actually live like a millionaire. There is more than sufficient wealth in the United States to achieve this! Remember that all of the capitalists’ wealth was originally expropriated and stolen from the labor of the Working Class—through expropriation of Surplus Value. Only after class society is abolished through a Socialist Revolution can there be free speech and genuine democracy for the Working Class and everyone else. This analysis is intended as an aid to help progressive people consciously deprogram themselves from the capitalist brainwash which targets the masses every day from every direction and to provide a basis to help organize the Socialist Revolution in the United States. Socialism will abolish the basis of all wars and set the stage for solving the entire complex of problems created by capitalism-imperialism. In the final analysis all wars are won and lost on morale and every movement begins with the call. This analysis is part of that call.THE CAPITALISTS ARE WAGING ECONOMIC WAR AGAINST US!The Obama Regime Has Already Begun to Abolish the FUNCTION ofSocial Security as a Means to Reduce the Population of Senior Citizens!On April 22, 2009 Obama Eliminated the Social Security Cost ofLiving Adjustment (COLA), while Simultaneously Giving $4.7 TrillionTo the Banks! The False Report that Social Security Will SoonBe Totally Insolvent by 2016 and Completely Depleted by 2037Indicates that the COLA Elimination Will Be Permanent!In his very first speech to a joint session of Congress on February 24, 2009 Obama demonstrated that his objectives coincided precisely with those of George Bush when he threatened to implement the George Bush “tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.” “Private accounts” had been widely recognized and rejected under Bush as simply a clumsy scheme to end Social Security by diverting money away from Social Security into the totally erratic stock market, where the capitalist dictatorship assumes hopefully that most of it would be lost thus bringing Senior Citizens to crushing poverty and an earlier death and thus help to reduce the “population demographic.” Obama’s first step was to begin the elimination of the FUNCTION of Social Security.On April 22, 2009 the Obama Regime eliminated the Social Security Adjustment COLA for 2010 and 2011, while simultaneously giving $4.7 trillion (!) to the banks, brokerages, insurance companies, hedge funds, groups, private equity groups and car companies. The tiny “$250 stimulus checks” sent out to Social Security recipients were strictly a one-time event used to BUY THE SILENCE of Social Security recipients in response to the Obama Regime’s elimination of the Social Security Cost of Living Allowance, which will be permanent, and in order to keep Senior Citizens CONFUSED while he takes further steps to abolish the function of Social Security and wage economic war on the masses from every conceivable angle while falsely claiming that HE has “pulled the economy back from the brink,” which he most certainly has NOT! The economy is NOT “back from the brink.” Over 30 million Americans are actually now unemployed if all categories are included. And the stock market has experienced a bear market rally through stock market manipulation achieved through 1.) new high-frequency trading programs used by the large investment banks, hedge funds, private equity groups and insurance companies and 2.) a Big Lie propaganda campaign falsely claiming that the economy is “recovering,” which it is NOT! (See below and Part II, which will be posted next.) In addition to this immediate direct reduction of Social Security Benefits the capitalist dictatorship’s so-called “Social Security Overhaul,” which is scheduled to be implemented following the so-called “Healthcare Overhaul,” will undoubtedly also include a switcheroo from wage-based indexing which is used to calculate the original Social Security Benefit amount, to price-based aka inflation-based indexing, which will also help to abolish the FUNCTION of Social Security. (See further below for an easy solution proposed by Representative Robert Wexler (D) of Florida to make Social Security solvent forever.) The capitalists still intend to retain Social Security for appearances but to use it NOT for its original purpose to keep older people alive, but primarily to maintain it as a slush fund to pay for various U.S. wars as it is already! Meanwhile as mentioned the progressive tax structure in the United States, which would eliminate ALL the financial problems associated with the funding of social programs has been permanently abolished. See below.The ONLY REASON that the Economic Crisis does not assume the form of the Great Depression is because of reforms instituted under the New Deal such as Unemployment Insurance, Social Security and the FDIC. The Obama Regime’s so-called Public-Private Investment Program, part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money supposedly to be used to buy toxic assets in the toxic derivative market which includes securitized subprime mortgages and collateralized debt obligations (see below), is to be backed by the $700 billion bank bailout fund, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp! The FDIC!!! Whaaaat? The FDIC is what backs the individual accounts of private in banks to $100,000, now supposedly $250,000. But government claims of insuring individual accounts by the FDIC are all fiction in the first place. But so far the banks have not wanted to sell their toxic assets. See below. If there were actual bank runs as in the 1930s Great Depression there would be no money at all for most Americans! (See below.) There would be a total collapse of the U.S. standard of living and poverty greater than in the Great Depression! Buying back toxic assets by the U.S. government is yet one more PHONY PRETEXT to divert money from social spending and demolish what remains of the New Deal.This analysis was confirmed on August 11, 2009 when it was reported in the New York Times: ”The nation’s banks continue to hold on their books billions of dollars in assets about whose proper valuation there is a dispute (?) and that are very difficult to sell. As a result, many banks could find themselves short of capital if the economy suffered another downturn and their losses on troubled loans soared. Based on the results of the so-called stress tests in April 2009 the report stated that 18 of the 19 biggest bank holding companies would probably have enough capital even if economic and financial conditions deteriorated more than they have already. The report warned that thousands of small and medium-size banks, which it defined as those with assets of $600 million to $100 billion, might find themselves short a total of $21 billion if the conditions matched its worst-case assumptions. (Parenthesis and emphasis added.)The Explanation of the Big Lie Technique:While following the moves of the Obama Regime and the media it is important to understand the Big Lie Technique. There are 2 parts to the Big Lie: 1.) The first part of the Big Lie is that the lie must be BIG, because most people only tell little lies and are entirely unprepared for a Big Lie. 2.) The second part of the Big Lie Technique is to repeat the lie over and over again from every media source even including textbooks and movies until it is accepted as truth or accepted at least as partly true, when it is most invariably entirely false. In addition, lies may be lies of commission or lies of omission. They are equally unacceptable. The media is a privatized arm of the U.S. “intelligence agency,” a vast army of legions of professional liars working in service to the capitalist dictatorship. The U.S. media is very similar to Blackwater, Dyncorp, Custer Battles and Triple Canopy, etc. the armed military contractors in Iraq, except that the media has always been privatized.The OBAMA BANK BAILOUTS were thus both 1.) unnecessary and 2.) unwanted by the banks and have had NO part in any falsely claimed “green shoots/economic recovery” which has NOT occurred despite the capitalist dictatorship’s Big Lie propaganda campaign to the contrary! The reasons that the banks said that the so-called Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money was unnecessary is that the banks simply wrote off the TOXIC ASSETS off their books by scrapping mark-to-market accounting thus making the toxic assets supposedly NONTOXIC. (!?) For real!! The banks have even steadfastly refused to sell their toxic assets to the U.S. Treasury Department insisting that the prices offered were too low and that they would take “the long view” and wait. The bank bailouts were also unwanted because those banks which accepted TARP money had to agree to conform to any new financial regulations or laws. Demonstrating once more that he is simply the corrupt puppet of the banks and the capitalist dictatorship of billionaires and millionaires, Obama announced that he had allowed the 10 largest banks to escape future reforms and regulations simply by repaying only $68.3 billion, which represents only a quarter of the $239.4 billion Bank Bailout money they have received (!), and thereby exit the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)!In addition, instead of DELAYING GOVERNMENT ACCEPTANCE of these piddling repayments until the supposedly “broad regulatory reform proposals were announced in another week” or however long it might have taken to be passed by Congress, Obama accepted the money early in order that those 10 largest banks would NOT have to submit to any serious banking regulation or oversight or salary caps! (New York Times, June10-11, 2009). Those banks have been allowed to keep the remainder of the $239.4 billion, TARP money which is simply stolen, primarily from the working class, money which has been brazenly and deliberately diverted away from social programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the new “Healthcare Overhaul” and public education thus serving the same economic/political purpose as Supply-Side economics. And it should be noted that $4.7 trillion have been turned over to the banks NOT $merely $billions! See below. As an indication that the large banks are fully in the loop and understand that the U.S. economy is to be deliberately permitted to contract in accordance with Globalism and in order to reduce a “redundant work force” and reduce the overall population, the banks are NOT EVEN LENDING TO SMALL BUSINESS or individuals using either the bank bailouts OR Obama “stimulus” money ($255 million) expressly directed to the Small Business Administration! (New York Times, August 13, 2009) The masses, who have no representation under capitalism, and who have been inoculated against Socialism—the only solution to the entire complex of problems which have been created by capitalism—are expected to simply nod their heads “OK” in passive brainwashed acceptance.The enemy of my enemy is my friend and the friend of my enemy is my enemy. This is inductive reasoning, the reasoning of science. We should not forget that our greatest enemy is the capitalist dictatorship of millionaires and billionaires. The Town Hall protests against the Obama Healthcare Overhaul have been taken over by the Republicans and other assorted Fascists with heavy media focus on shills, plants who carry signs and scream that they oppose “Obama socialism,” “communist-fascism” and “government take-over of medicine,” slogans designed to keep the masses confused (Because a confused person cannot act!), while actually supporting Obama Care which completely turns over all medical care to the insurance companies and HMOs! Obama Care has nothing to do with Socialized Medicine and is indeed an example of medical Fascism not Socialism. The bulk of those attending the town hall meetings are actually opposed to the private insurance/HMOs and would support the so-called Single-Payer Health Plan, which is socialized medicine. But so far unfortunately the present correlation of class forces, where the capitalist dictatorship is still much stronger than the unorganized forces of the Working Class and its allies, permits the U.S. masses to be easily misled and manipulated against their own best interests.The Real Purpose of the So-called “Obama Healthcare Overhaul” is toAbolish Medicare and Medicaid by Cutting $400-$500 Billion of “Savings” fromThose Government Programs to “Help Pay” for the $1.6 Trillion “Obama PlanWhile Turning Over All Healthcare to the Insurance Companies and HMOsUnder the False Slogan of “Healthcare for All”!The Capitalist Dictatorship intends to Escalate Economic Warfare AgainstThe Working Class and the Poor! The Objective is to Reduce the PopulationBy Denying and Rationing Healthcare in Order to Bring People to an EarlierDeath! Any “Public Option” Will be Designed to Profit from HumanIllness and Disease Just Like the Private Insurance/HMO Parasites!Re-introduction of a Progressive Tax Structure Would Easily Pay Entirely forSingle-Payer Government Run Health Care and Pay for Social Security ForeverBut the One-Way Dynamic of Capitalism Prevents This! Socialism is the Answer!The real purpose of the Obama “Overhaul” is to turn over all healthcare to the insurance companies and HMOs while ending the government programs of Medicare and Medicaid by cutting $400 billion to $500 billion in “savings” from those programs, which the capitalist dictatorship will eventually simply abolish and fold into “Obama Care” in order to eliminate the complaints that “Medicare and Medicaid are not working.” That way there will be no Medicare and Medicaid in practice and no more complaints! Hey, what’s not to like? The reality is that the so-called “savings” which will be due to the Obama Regime’s cuts from Medicare and Medicaid will actually cause these complaints! Demonstrating once again Obama is not afraid to lie right to the face of his victims Obama stated at a town-hall type meeting organized by the treacherous AARP Obama claimed: “Nobody is talking about cutting Medicare benefits.” (New York Times, July 29, 2009)) Cutting Medicare Benefits is EXACTLY what the Obama Regime intends to do! Obama has frequently promised to “rein in spending on retirement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.” (New York Times, January 8, 2009). In another Big Lie the Obama Regime announced: “it would not try to cut the short-term deficits until the economy recovers enough that businesses and consumers resume their spending and investment.” (New York Times, August 26, 2009) But the economy will NOT recover and CAN not recover unless the government institutes huge Federal Jobs Programs equivalent to 37% of GDP, which is the only possible way to sufficiently stimulate DEMAND, the engine of the economy, and permit the economy to recover. Instead the plan by the capitalist dictatorship of millionaires and billionaires is to deliberately allow the economy to contract according to the dynamic of Globalism! See below. The Obama Regime obviously intends simply at some point to declare that “the Great Recession” (the word Depression is never used) is over and that will be the signal to “cut short-term deficits.” On July 31, 2009 the government reported that the GDP was negative for the 4th successive quarter! Officially it takes 6 negative quarters of GDP growth to define a depression. But the capitalists will falsify numbers as they already do in order to never permit that truth to appear. The truth is that without large-scale Federal jobs programs the equivalent of New Deal/WWII spending to the level of 37% of GDP there will be NO recovery! Period! The economy will simply continue to contract. See further below.Meanwhile the false “Grandma Death Panels” issue is a deliberately designed but easily discredited distraction used to divert focus away from this central objective of eliminating Medicare and Medicaid in practice as part of the “Healthcare Overhaul” and turning everything over to the insurance companies and HMOs. And the reason that Obama has delayed naming a new head for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is because the Obama Regime does NOT want ANY focus on Medicare and Medicaid or anyone speaking in support of those government programs, which Obama has now scheduled for huge cuts and eventual elimination. In fact the reason that Obama had filled only 43% of his top policy making positions by September 2009 (New York Times, August 24, 2009), which he could easily get confirmed by his Democratically controlled Congress, is that the Obama Regime wants to appear weak and unable to function and this would not be possible if those policy positions were filled and those new Democratic Party policy chiefs were out there speaking forcefully and building support for a genuine “the Public Option,” for example!In other words not everyone can be brought into confidence on the reversal of all the anti-Bush campaign promises. It should also be noted that whenever possible Obama tries to appoint Republicans rather than Democrats to key policy-making positions thus further undermining the voters’ will! During his campaign Obama promised that “everything is on the table” in reforming health care. As soon as he was elected Obama stated that “The Single-Payer Health Plan,” where the government, rather than the insurance companies/HMOs, directly pay the healthcare providers was “OFF THE TABLE.” Social Security, Medicare and the Veterans’ Administration are the most popular government programs, where the government makes NO actual medical decisions, and could EASILY be paid for by re-instituting a Progressive Tax Structure in the United States! See below. Obama is for all intents and purposes nothing but a (technically) Black Bush! “Technically Black” is a description used by the Black Panther Party to describe someone like Obama. Obama is “Black” like Kindasleezy Rice is “Black” or like Colin Powell is “Black” or like Clarence Thomas is “Black” or like “Black” news anchors and commentators are “Black.” That’s not Black! Black is Malcom X, Martin Luther King Junior, preferably after he finally took a position against the Vietnam War in April 1967, and of course the Black Panther Party and especially its leaders, Mark Clark and Fred Hampton. Fred Hampton said that the answer to white capitalism was NOT Black capitalism. The answer is Socialism!Obama Immediately Abandoned His Support for the Single-Payer HealthPlan which He only Used to Con Support from Democratic ConstituenciesIn Order to Get Elected and then Turn Everything over to the HMOs!Those Who Already have Coverage are “Not Eligible” for any Public Plan!Obama quickly reversed his position and opposed outright support for Single-Payer because it is a fact that a government plan PAID FOR ENTIRELY BY THE GOVERNMENT would indeed compete with and COMPLETELY REPLACE the insurance companies and HMOs and REDUCE the cost of healthcare! Obama and the Democrats’ previous support for Single-Payer Socialized Medicine, which was supported by the overwhelming majority of the U.S. population, was done ONLY in order to SUCK PEOPLE IN and then twice employed the BAIT AND SWITCH, first by offering the Public Option to compete with the insurance companies. Then when it became clear that even the conservative so-called “Blue Dog” Democrats would not support ANY healthcare legislation which included the Public Option, the Obama Regime announced that the final so-called “Healthcare Overhaul” legislation will turn over healthcare lock stock and barrel to the insurance companies and HMOs and that a Public Plan was “NOT essential!” Pressure from the masses and some liberal Democratic Party leaders may force some sort of a “Public Plan,” but those who already have healthcare coverage are NOT eligible for the Public Plan, and despite Obama’s talk of “healthcare exchanges” switching from one insurance company to another would NOT be permitted and has no support in Congress and is strongly opposed by Labor Unions, employers, hospitals and drug companies. (New York Times, 26, 2009) The scenario is to pass such an onerous “Healthcare Overhaul” bill and let Obama take the blame early in his administration and use the media to try to deflect that blame from Obama and the capitalist dictatorship.But there is no reason whatsoever why healthcare should be permitted to exist as a BUSINESS in the first place where insurance companies “compete” for PROFITS at the people’s expense while parasitizing off human illness and disease! Free healthcare should be a right and it is in a Socialist system in fully consolidated Workers’ States! Even in some capitalist systems! Although the insurance companies use the term “private” to try to make its largely Working Class victims think they are receiving “exclusive” or “special” healthcare coverage, the truth is that “special” is one more 1984 Orwellian Newspeak/Big Lie deception. “Private” insurance actually means big time PRIVATE PROFITS for the insurance companies and HMO billionaires! “Private” insurance means NO CHOICE for the its “customers”/victims because insurance companies make their HUGE PROFITS primarily by limiting medical care and by denying and rejecting every conceivable treatment, test and surgery sometimes even for emergencies! In order to cover up this fact Obama promises that the insurance companies will not be allowed to deny coverage based on previous medical history or a pre-existing condition. That’s all! BUT HEALTHCARE RATIONING WILL SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE UNDER THE OBAMA HEALTHCARE OVERHAUL! Healthcare rationing will increase under ANY version of Obama Care! And in many cases, despite Obama’s false denials, and promises of “subsidies” people living on the edge will either be forced to buy healthcare insurance which they can not afford or be fined! See below.Obama Cut a Secret George Bush-Type Deal With the Pharmaceutical IndustryThat Prevents the U.S. Government from Negotiating for Lower Drug PricesObama made a dirty deal with the pharmaceutical industry (PhRMA) first revealed on June 20, 2009 the exact same sort of deal made by George Bush where in exchange for Obama’s promise 1.) not to permit the new Obama Healthcare Overhaul System to negotiate lower prices for prescription drugs and 2.) not to permit additional rebates from drug manufacturers, the drug companies agreed to contribute $80 billion in “savings” over 10 years. The $80 billion in “savings” from the drug companies is NOTHING compared to the annual $300 billion profits of the drug companies which total $2.4 trillion over the same 10 years! And that is why the drug companies are running a $150 million ad campaign pushing Obama Care! The $80 billion would apply ONLY to those Medicare patients with Bush Medicare Part D who fall into a gap in their drug coverage known as the “doughnut hole” and only applies for brand name drugs thus ruling out use of the much cheaper generic drugs. The “doughnut hole” is the area that falls between the less than $2,700 and the more than $5,100 Medicare will pay for seniors’ prescription drugs. Anything in between, seniors are supposed to pay themselves but in practice many seniors are simply forced to stop taking their medications. They die quicker! Some Democrats such as Henry Waxman are now going through the motions of trying to recover a comparatively tiny amount in rebates from the drug companies of the $billions paid since 2003 for name brand drugs rather than generic equivalents. (New York Times, August 26, 2009) As explained in a 2003 New York Times Op-Ed, the PURPOSE of the 2003 Bush’s Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, which cost $678 billion over 10 years and prevented the federal government from negotiating lower prices from drug companies, and was to help put Medicare on the road to bankruptcy, saving the final coup de grace for the next Democratic president. And here comes Obama to finish the job with Medicare “savings!” Note that the Medicare Trust fund will indeed be “exhausted” by 2017 right on schedule according to a Trustees report! (Healthcare Finance News, May 19, 2009) But there is a way to get rid of the insurance companies/HMOs and brand name drugs and pay for everything easily. Simply re-institute a Progressive Tax Structure in the United States. See below! But capitalism cannot be genuinely reformed or turned back into New Deal liberalism because of the one-way dynamic of capitalism. That is why we need a Socialist Revolution in the Unite States.A “Public Plan” Will Also Offer NO Choice Whatsoever becauseIt Will ALSO Be Based Primarily On Profits NOT Patient Health!Obama and the U.S. Congress are ALL merely puppets of the insurance companies and HMO’s and it is therefore now obvious that the Obama Regime intends to use “HEALTHCARE OVERHAUL” as the pretext to END the government plans known as Medicare and Medicaid in practice by simply cutting their funding to help pay for “Obama Care.” The controversy over the “Public Plan” is being used as a diversion from this reality which leaves the private health insurance business completely intact and increases their business astronomically! Because of the fact that a genuine Public Plan would indeed replace all private insurance plans because it would NOT be based on profit, “Chucky Boy” Schumer came up with a trick to deceive the masses for whom he has only total contempt. “Chucky Boy” Schumer wrote a “compromise public healthcare plan which would abide by the same rules and regulations as private plans” designed to start off with start-up government funding and initially to be 20% to 30% cheaper than the “private plans” but then eventually to change to be PROFITABLE AND EXPLOITIVE JUST LIKE THE PRIVATE PLANS. That ignores the question that if the public plan and the private plans would really abide by the exact same rules, what is the point of a public plan in the first place? Would the U.S. population agree to be so deceived? Even such an amended Schumer plan where the “Public Plan” would be temporarily only slightly less profitable and therefore only slightly cheaper (20% to 30%) than the private HMOs was rejected by the Republicans and rightwing Democrats, who simultaneously 1.) provide Obama with LEFT COVER with his own constituencies by hilariously labeling him a “socialist” and 2.) move the entire political process to the right! Alternative “nonprofit consumer-owned cooperatives” have even been offered as an alternative to a public plan. But healthcare cooperatives are a sham and are also run by the insurance companies! It should be noted that “Chucky Boy” Schumer was the author of the Fascist repressive Patriot Act (reportedly nearly half written by the time of the 911 U.S. Government-Facilitated Provocation by in-the-loop Chucky. See below.)The Democrats Proposal for a Tiny 1% Surcharge on Individual Incomes MakingOver $280,000 and on Couples Making Over $350,000 is a JOKE and Is No SubstituteFor Reintroduction of a New Deal Type Progressive Tax Structure in the United States!The answer is that supposedly trying to “reduce healthcare costs” is all a diversion! Obama and the entire Congress are all paid off by the insurance companies/HMO’s, banks, oil companies and military industrial complex. Any healthcare plan that emerges will be run by the parasite insurance companies and HMOs, just like the present state plans, which have also been disingenuously offered as an alternative to a public plan to try to keep people confused! A confused person cannot act! As mentioned the Obama Regime’s healthcare plan will be paid for largely by “savings” (!) by cutting Medicare payments to hospitals and also by taxing the healthcare benefits of those who already have healthcare! But NEVER by seriously taxing the rich! The request by the Democrats in the House for a TINY surcharge beginning only in 2011 (!) starting at 1% on individuals making over $280,000 and couples making over $350,000, with slight increases at incomes of over $400,000 and $800,000, or even a 1% surtax ONLY on those making over $1 million, is not even meant to pay for healthcare entirely and is strongly opposed in the Senate, which since the New Deal and starting with the John Kennedy administration, has completely eliminated the progressive tax structure which used to exist in the United States. The House also protects the millionaires and billionaires and is simply going through the motions!It should be noted that even this tiny 1% surtax on the incomes of the capitalists themselves would raise $550 billion over 10 years! This is about a third of the $1.6 trillion needed for 10 years according to the Obama Regime. (The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the cost of the “Healthcare Overhaul” will be $1.6 trillion not $1 trillion!) But $550 billion is a small amount compared to the $4.7 trillion which has already been permanently turned over to the banks in the bank bailouts! As mentioned, the remainder of “the cost of healthcare” is to come from regressive taxes and “savings” primarily from Medicare/Medicaid. Obviously a 3% Surtax would ENTIRELY pay for any “Healthcare overhaul” and would entirely pay for a Single-Payer Government run Healthcare Plan—Socialized Medicine. But capitalism can not be reformed and made better because of the one-way dynamic of capitalism described above! The reality remains: 95% of New Yorkers and presumably the majority of Americans when given the choice agree that we need a new system based on human need not private profit! That is a Communist response although few would presently describe themselves as Communist. But it means that the majority of Americans would be receptive to Socialism right now! The overwhelming majority of the American people want Socialized Medicine and when polled honestly they choose Socialism and recognize that capitalism has failed. The contradiction is that the U.S. Working Class is presently so deliberately misinformed, misled, divided, disorganized, demoralized, intimidated, infantalized and so brainwashed on every conceivable basis that they are prevented from engaging in any sort of organized effective action on the basis of their own class interest because of the present correlation of class forces, where the capitalists are still too strong. (See below.) But this will not last forever because capitalism is on the road to economic collapse NOT “recovery.” See below.Fines For Not Being Covered by the “Healthcare Overhaul” AreExpected to Raise at least $52 Billion as Capitalism DRAINS US DRY!The capitalist dictatorship also intends to make the masses pay for Obama Care primarily through “mandates” which target individuals and small business, meaning that those who are uninsured must now either buy health insurance or be fined to further impoverish them! These fines alone are expected to “raise (at least) $52 billion to cover the costs of the uninsured (!).” (New York Times, August 13, 2009) The Obama “Healthcare Overhaul” is also to be paid for by regressive taxation as mentioned above targeting primarily the Working Class—not the “middle class”—and “savings” (cuts in other social programs) rather than seriously taxing the rich through legislating a New Progressive Tax Structure in the United States where the top tax rate would be over 90% like it was under the New Deal and up until the end of the Eisenhower administration during the period of greatest economic prosperity in the United States! In addition ALL income should be taxed, not just the first $102,000.00 as is presently the case! (A millionaire or billionaire pays taxes ONLY on the first $102,000!) The top tax rate should be at least 90% on ALL income! The “Effective Top U.S. Federal Tax Rate” is now only 27.9%, while the Effective Tax Rate for the average taxpayer is 18.2%. (New York Times, August 28, 2009) This is almost a flat tax! See below. The capitalist dictatorship has already DRAINED US DRY and is now literally moving in for the kill. This is no exaggeration! See below. The despised Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers have also stated: “(Working Class) taxes might have to go up to pare budget deficits or to pay for the proposed overhaul of the nation’s health care system.” (Associated Press, August 3, 2009)Obama Proposed a Bush-Privatization of the VeteransAdministration within 2 Months of Taking Office!Because of the fact that the VA is socialized medicine it was initially partially de-funded by the Bush Regime and more than 20 VA hospitals were threatened with closure! Obama’s claimed “support” for the VA is a sham and a Big Lie starting with an immediate attempt announced on March 16, 2009 to begin to privatize the Veterans Administration less than one month of taking office! The Obama/Bush Regime attempted to authorize the Department of Veterans Affairs to force veterans to begin to partially pay for treating war-related injuries and other medical conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, that are war-related using private insurance companies! The pretext was supposedly to “save” the VA about $530 million a year! The overhead of the Veterans Administration Hospitals is less than 5% and the overhead for Medicare is only 2%, while the overhead of the parasite HMO/private insurance plans is 30% or more, which forms the basis for their profits! There is NO money whatsoever “saved” by privatizing the Veterans Administration or Medicare. Just the opposite! Obama is a liar and he knows he’s a liar! The Obama regime is simply maneuvering to permit private health insurers to increase their parasitizing off the misery, illness and disease of the American people! Incidentally, Veterans are already charged a privatized co-payment for non-war acquired medical conditions in order to help out the HMO parasites!Obama was immediately opposed on his privatization scheme by all veterans groups, which finally forced the new Veterans Affairs Secretary/Obama puppet Gen. Eric Shinseki to reverse his initial support for the Obama privatization plan! Previously the capitalists were able to deceive the masses domestically by throwing out a few crumbs and scraps, while the overwhelming bulk of their programs in the last several decades were deliberately designed to directly attack the lives and living standard of the majority of the American people. On June 24, 2009 after widespread criticism and increasing awareness among veterans that Obama was giving them the same treatment doled out under Bush the Congress passed legislation approving the budget for the Veteran’s Administration one year in advance to prevent the delays which had occurred for 19 of the last 22 years! Those delays combined with cutbacks were deliberately designed to cause cancellation or postponement of programs, not enough equipment, fewer doctors, longer waiting times and restricted access to healthcare for veterans causing rationing of healthcare in order to falsely discredit the Veterans Administration healthcare because it is SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!Remember that the words “reform” and “overhaul” under capitalism are simply code words for attack on the Working Class. The capitalists have now decided to escalate their attacks on the masses and have switched their gears to EXTERMINATE a significant percentage workers made “redundant,” under Globalism as well as a significant percentage of the general population both in the United States and worldwide. Globalism has rendered millions of workers redundant—no longer necessary under capitalism—and the present Economic Crisis/Second Great Depression has provided the ideal point for the U.S.-led World Capitalist Dictatorship to reduce their populations and the entire world population! The capitalists are now trumpeting their fraudulent plans for “universal health care.” This is all a deception meant to cover their primary program of extermination as described above and herein! The capitalists plan to base their “universal health insurance” on the present criminal parasite HMO insurance based health plans rather than the comparatively high quality system used by the U.S. Veterans Administration (VA), a form of socialized medicine, which is anathema to the capitalist dictatorship and their current puppet Obama. This is one more reason why we need a Socialist Revolution in the United States!The Capitalists Have Completely AbolishedThe Progressive Tax Structure of the New Deal!The progressive tax structure was completely and totally abolished starting with John Kennedy who was far to the right of the New Dealer Dwight Eisenhower. (The Kennedys hated Roosevelt and the New Deal after FDR appointed Joe Kennedy as the U.S. Ambassador to the UK at the Court of St. James, a total insult to the Irishman Kennedy, who was then later withdrawn in humiliation because of his multiple statements in support of Adolph Hitler! FDR and the Great Britain DID support Hitler both through the covert economic aid provided by U.S. capitalists and diplomatically by refusing to sign any alliance with the USSR against the NAZIs, and helped build Hitler’s rise to power in order to send the NAZIs against the USSR, in a failed attempt to destroy the USSR militarily in WWII! But that was a state secret NOT for public consumption!)JFK reduced the As mentioned from 91% under Eisenhower down to 70%! Under the Fascist Ronald Reagan the Kemp-Roth Tax-Cut of 1981 reduced the top rate from 70% to 50%! The Reagan the Tax Reform Act of 1986 led by Fascist-Democrat Bill “basketballs” Bradley lowered the top tax rate from 50% to 28%! It was later increased slightly to 39.6% under Bill Clinton and then reduced to 35% under the Bush Regime! Obama has promised to “raise” the top tax rate back to an astronomical…39.6% in another 2 years! What a joke! The joke is on you and me! As mentioned, the “Effective Top U.S. Federal Tax Rate” is now only 27.9% and that will NOT change appreciably! Abolishing the progressive tax structure of the United States has permitted the capitalist dictatorship to completely rob every last penny so that there is NO money whatsoever to pay for anything, especially Social Security and other social programs, which are derisively referred to as “entitlements” as in “who do THEY think THEY are being ENTITLED to ANTHING—why don’t they (the Working Class, their allies and the Poor) “just pull themselves by their own bootstraps” like Herbert Hoover said? But today the capitalists have other fish to fry: population reduction in the United States and worldwide. The extermination of millions of people! See above.The truth is that for all intents and purposes Obama is a (technically) “Black” Bush as explained above. The reason we know for a fact that Obama never had any intention of changing anything is that politicians rise to the top based on their ability to express and further the one-way dynamic of capitalism, a dynamic which leads to Fascism, barbarism and finally the end of civilization. This is how we know for a fact that Obama most certainly does not even want to change anything for the better despite his phony propaganda slogans to represent nebulous “change”! Now with the Runaway Greenhouse Effect having begun, this means the end of all life on Earth because capitalism intends to do nothing serious to combat Global Warming and treats that threat the very same way they “reform the economy” or “reform healthcare,” meaning they are just going through the motions. Obama understands that his role is to deceive the masses and he clearly enjoys that role! Note that the Obama propaganda never specifies what kind of “change” it is that we can believe in. “Yes we can” Obama trumpeted! Those nebulous slogans were carefully designed to say nothing! Obama’s role is to string people along and placate the masses with his “golden rhetoric” while carrying out the dismantlement of as many social programs as possible and to demolish what is left of the New Deal.The only “change” which can actually occur under Obama is the continued hardening of the capitalist dictatorship! Obama has been chosen for his ability to deceive the masses regarding that actual dynamic, development sequence and direction of capitalism. Obama is a slicker, a con man, a demagogue out to bamboozle the unsuspecting victims: the Working Class and its allies primarily. Obama’s book, “The Audacity of Hope” was written initially to demonstrate to the capitalist dictatorship that he was best able to perpetuate false hope in capitalism-imperialism. Only after he became a candidate did public curiosity increase sales enough among the duped masses to make Obama a millionaire. “Hope in capitalism” is what Jesse Jackson meant when he introduced his slogan: “Keep Hope Alive!” Much earlier Martin Luther King publicly reviled Jesse Jackson to his face with numerous witnesses as “nothing but an opportunist.” For anyone following the presidential campaign and “elections” it should have been obvious that McCain was only running as a foil to take a fall for the Democratic candidate, whoever it would be just like in TV wrestling.Progressive Taxation is Good for the Economy!Regressive Taxation is Bad for the Economy!In addition, the elimination of the Social Security Cost-of-Living will become permanent in practice with the claim of “no more dollars” due to the Bank Bailouts and Economic Crisis and “the high cost” of the Obama Health Insurance Plan ($ 1.6 trillion), for example, claims which have already been made to justify COLA elimination in the first place! In order to telegraph this future claim of “no more dollars” the elimination of the Social Security COLA was followed on May 13, 2009 with the announcement that the Social Security Trust Fund will be “insolvent” by 2016 and “totally depleted by 2037!” This contrived scenario, which was declared with fanfare by the Congress to be “UNSUSTAINABLE” and required “shared sacrifice through reduction of Social Security benefits,” was made possible primarily by the complete abolition of the progressive tax structure in the United States described above. According to a report from the Government Accountability Office (Associated Press, August 12, 2008) 66% of U.S. companies paid no federal income taxes and 68% of foreign companies doing business in the United States paid zero corporate taxes between 1998 and 2005, while reporting $2.5 trillion in sales! This includes 1.2 million U.S. companies and 38,000 foreign companies. The only taxes which remain today are regressive taxes meaning that they target the Working Class and Poor primarily. Examples include: 1.) National sales tax, 2.) National value-added tax, 3.) Flat Tax, 4.) Increases in the subway and bus fares and tolls and 4.) Outright cuts in services even in the U.S. Post Office and 4.) The system of fines, which the Bolsheviks abolished entirely in 1917, is even being ridiculously increased.The Capitalist Dictatorship Keeps the Masses Totally Confused About Taxes!There is never any explanation provided concerning the vast difference between progressive taxes, which normally tax the rich more than 90% of their income, versus regressive taxes which tax the poor and which are correctly opposed by the masses. By cleverly manipulating and omitting these simple, fundamental facts of taxation the capitalist dictatorship of billionaires and millionaires is able to keep the masses totally confused and opposed to “taxes” in general, and with their reduced understanding this means only regressive taxes, the only taxes which are imposed in this, the most reactionary period of end stage capitalism. Abolishing the progressive tax system and imposing only regressive taxes combined with the bank bailouts, supply-side economics and basic exploitation of labor mentioned above has allowed the capitalist dictatorship to steal virtually every last penny leaving nothing for social services or even infrastructure maintenance! This follows naturally from the one-way dynamic of capitalism, which is not based on human need but only on increasing private profits. This dialectical and historical analysis is the only explanation which fits the facts.The Real Purpose of Bank Bailouts is to Divert Money FromSocial Spending—the Same Purpose as Supply-Side Economics!The Only Way to Lift the Economy Out of Crisis isTo STIMULATE DEMAND Through Huge Federal JobsPrograms Just Like the New Deal and World War II!Note that Franklin Delano Roosevelt gave no money whatsoever to the banks to lift the U.S. out of the Great Depression! Instead FDR created DEMAND by creating JOBS with huge New Deal Federal Jobs programs (e.g. the WPA, etc.) to replace the jobs lost in the private sector, and finally by the huge spending of WWII, which was the largest federal jobs program in all U.S. history! Creating Demand through enormous Federal Jobs Programs is equally important in the present Economic Crisis as it was during the Great Depression, despite the fact that origins of the 2 crises are somewhat different. (See Part II Analysis.) The reasons for this are twofold: 1.) The jobs which have been lost, more than 18-20 million actual jobs lost and more than 30 million unemployed if ALL categories are included, are from the PRIVATE SECTOR and there are NO more private employers! and 2.) Demand is what drives the economy! The $4.7 trillion Bank Bailouts of 2008-2009 are simply being used as the pretext to DIVERT money away from Social Programs just as Supply Side/Trickle Down/Reaganomics/Bush Tax Cut economics is also used to divert money from Social Spending and has NOTHING to do with stimulating the economy, as so eloquently explained by Ronald Reagan’s economic Czar, David Stockman in his book “The Triumph of Politics: Why The Reagan Revolution Failed!”Instead of Implementing Another New DealObama Offers the No Deal and The Bad Deal!Emphasis on the Federal Deficit Is Being UsedTo Set the Stage for Cuts in Social Programs!The real reason that Obama started talking about cutting the deficit in half the day after his tiny “stimulus plan” was signed into law was to set the stage and provide a false basis for huge $500 Billion cuts in Medicare/Medicaid and eliminating the Social Security Cost-of-Living Allowance and other social programs. As mentioned, Obama has frequently promised to “rein in spending on retirement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.” (New York Times, January 8, 2009). On May 8, 2009 Obama called for making 121 budget cuts to save a paltry $17 billion (Associated Press), budget cuts most of which are designed to target the Working Class and the Poor and to help to put them in the gutter. Then later in order to provide further false basis for these cuts in social programs the Obama Regime Office of Management and Budget raised its 10-year federal deficit estimate to $9 trillion stating that Obama is also “committed to addressing the shortfall in the Social Security system.” (New York Times, August 26, 2009) But Obama has already taken a giant leap to ending the FUNCTION of Social Security by eliminating the Social Security COLA. See above.In addition, Housing foreclosures escalate every day under Obama’s “PLAN” which is deliberately designed to help only a TINY percentage of borrowers! Obama said nothing while the Democratically-controlled Senate, which is completely controlled by the big capitalists, blocked changing the bankruptcy law to permit reducing the amount that homeowners owed on a first mortgage stating that homeowners must instead enter the government foreclosure relief program, controlled by the banks, whose participation is entirely voluntary (!) and which only permit much smaller reductions in mortgage payments. The banks, in turn, almost uniformly give homeowners bad deals or fail to negotiate in good faith with borrowers because the late fees they earn far exceed the paltry $1,000-$4,000 “enticements” offered by Obama. CNBC TV reports that there may be up to 10 million foreclosures in the next 3 years! The “Stimulus Plan” does not address this reality. The truth is that the Obama so-called “Stimulus Plan” is actually deliberately designed to INCREASE the number of homeless in the United States and thereby reduce the “population demographic” by bringing these people to an earlier death! This is covert mass murder combined with maximum denial and is another demonstration of just how effective the Big Lie technique is when directed at an unorganized population which has been rendered anti-Communist.The Obama Regime is Deliberately Using Mortgage Defaultsto Increase Homelessness and Reduce the Population!The Obama plan to “reduce mortgage foreclosures” is actually deliberately designed to INCREASE FORECLOSURES! It was openly admitted on the front page of the New York Times (July 30, 2009) that astronomical Late-Fee Profits DWARF the tiny $4,000 “incentive offered banks by the Obama Regime not to foreclose on customers! The Obama incentives help only 9% of “eligible homeowners” (New York Times, August 5, 2009). In addition, the massive loss of jobs makes even previously so-called creditworthy homeowners fall behind on mortgage payments and become homeless. Videos on the Evening News document that tent cities now exist in many U.S. cities inhabited by those who have been foreclosed upon, similar to the Hoovervilles during the Great Depression. A government decreed complete moratorium on mortgage foreclosures is obviously required and should have been announced the day Obama took office if he had been serious, which he never was! The Obama Regime could still announce a moratorium on mortgage foreclosures but it will NEVER DO SO because Obama represents the capitalist dictatorship of billionaires and millionaires not the working class and their allies and because of the one-way dynamic of capitalism described above. False emphasis on the federal deficit rather than on creating a massive federal jobs program to stimulate demand demonstrates the sophisticated and extensive manipulation of public opinion which is involved. Obama offers the No Deal and the Bad Deal of capitalism.Cutting Government Spending to “Cut the Deficit” isHistorically Documented to Deepen Economic Crisis!Only by Increasing Spending to the Level of CombinedNew Deal/World War II Spending to 37% of GDP andALL on Federal Jobs Programs is it Possible LiftThe United States Out of the Economic Crisis!False focus on the federal deficit is deliberately used to 1.) provide false support to cut Social Security Benefits and cut $500 billion from Medicare/Medicaid and 2.) divert attention from what is actually required to end the Economic Crisis and will make that crisis much worse! The capitalist dictatorship of millionaires and billionaires believes that this is necessary in order to solve the political problem of the “population demographic” in order to reduce the population in the U.S. in accordance with the demands of Globalism and the One-Way Dynamic of capitalism. The Obama Regime professes to be SO CONCERNED about the federal deficit increasing because of the “Healthcare Overhaul,” and so-called “entitlements,” Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. But it is also well known that cutting government spending while in an economic crisis will only deepen the crisis as when FDR mistakenly listened to the right wing and cut spending after the 1936 elections resulting in the “recession within the Depression” in 1937-1938. Cutting spending deepened the Japanese recession in the 1990’s. On the other hand, increasing spending sufficiently will lift a capitalist economy out of depression and entirely eliminate the federal deficit.The combination of New Deal and especially World War II spending on Federal Jobs Programs, to the level of 37% of GDP, is the ONLY thing which lifted the U.S. out of the Great Depression and eliminated the huge federal deficit, which was much greater than the present federal deficit! This spending on Federal Jobs Programs STIMULATED DEMAND—THE ENGINE OF THE ECONOMY and in combination with the Progressive Tax Structure described above, permitted the greatest economic expansion in all U.S. history in the late 1940’s and 1950’s. This has been corroborated by history and PREVIOUS explanations of the capitalists’ own Nobel Prize winner economist Paul Krugman and many others. Paul Krugman has recently tried to place the focus and blame for the Economic Crisis on individuals such as Reagan and others rather than being due to the dynamic of capitalism about which he deliberately remains silent. Krugman does this to keep readers confused as to what precisely is actually required in order to lift the economy out of the Economic Crisis. Krugman now just calls for “more stimulus” but refrains from saying how much more and how it should be spent. Krugman acknowledges that running a large deficit is normal during an Economic Crisis but hides the fact that the Obama Regime is putting so much focus on the deficit to provide a false pretext for cuts in government spending on social programs. Demonstrating that he is simply a tool of the capitalist dictatorship, Krugman SUPPORTS these cuts in social programs and false “savings” and does NOT point out that Federal spending to the level of New Deal/WWII spending, 37% of GDP is what is required to both lift the economy out of the crisis and totally eliminate the federal deficit. Is it bad guy versus good guys or is it increasing spending to 37% of GDP, primarily centered on federal jobs programs? The answer is obvious!The reality is that while people such as Reagan, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, William Clinton, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner and

Posted by William H. Depperman | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •