<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 political impacts of today&#8217;s July jobs report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacksmith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>jacksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>We have the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed world. Conservative estimates are that over 120,000 of you dies each year in America from treatable illness that people in other developed countries don&#039;t die from. Rich, middle class, and poor a like. Insured and uninsured. Men, women, children, and babies. This is what being 37th in quality of healthcare means.

I know that many of you are angry and frustrated that REPUBLICANS! In congress are dragging their feet and trying to block TRUE healthcare reform. What republicans want is just a taxpayer bailout of the DISGRACEFUL GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance industry, and the DISGRACEFUL GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare industry. A trillion dollar taxpayer funded private health insurance bailout is all you really get without a robust government-run public option available on day one. Co-OP&#039;s ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A GOVERNMENT-RUN PUBLIC OPTION. They are a fraud being pushed by the GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance industry that is KILLING YOU!

YOU CANT HAVE AN INSURANCE MANDATE WITHOUT A ROBUST PUBLIC OPTION. MANDATING PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTH INSURANCE AS YOUR ONLY CHOICE WOULD BE A DISASTER AND UNETHICAL, CORRUPT, AND MORALLY REPUGNANT. AND PROBABLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS WELL.

These industries have been slaughtering you and your loved ones like cattle for decades for profit. Including members of congress and their families. These REPUBLICANS are FOOLS!

Republicans and their traitorous allies have been trying to make it look like it&#039;s President Obama&#039;s fault for the delays, and foot dragging. But I think you all know better than that. President Obama inherited one of the worst government catastrophes in American history from these REPUBLICANS! And President Obama has done a brilliant job of turning things around, and working his heart out for all of us. 

But Republicans think you are just a bunch of stupid, idiot, cash cows with short memories. Just like they did under the Bush administration when they helped Bush and Cheney rape America and the rest of the World.

But you don&#039;t have to put up with that. And this is what you can do. The Republicans below will be up for reelection on November 2, 2010. Just a little over 13 months from now. And many of you will be able to vote early. So pick some names and tell their voters that their representatives (by name) are obstructing TRUE healthcare reform. And are sellouts to the insurance and medical lobbyist. 

Ask them to contact their representatives and tell them that they are going to work to throw them out of office on November 2, 2010, if not before by impeachment, or recall elections. Doing this will give you something more to do to make things better in America. And it will make you feel better too. 

There are many resources on the internet that can help you find people to call and contact. For example, many social networking sites can be searched by state, city, or University. Be inventive and creative. I can think of many ways to do this. But be nice. These are your neighbors. And most will want to help.

I know there are a few democrats that have been trying to obstruct TRUE healthcare reform too. But the main problem is the Bush Republicans. Removing them is the best thing tactically to do. On the other hand. If you can easily replace a democrat obstructionist with a supportive democrat, DO IT!

You have been AMAZING!!! my people. Don&#039;t loose heart. You knew it wasn&#039;t going to be easy saving the World. :-)

God Bless You

jacksmith — Working Class
		
I REST MY CASE (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/25/why-markets-cant-cure-healthcare/)

Republican Senators up for re-election in 2010.

* Richard Shelby of Alabama
* Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
* John McCain of Arizona
* Mel Martinez of Florida
* Johnny Isakson of Georgia
* Mike Crapo of Idaho
* Chuck Grassley of Iowa 
* Sam Brownback of Kansas 
* Jim Bunning of Kentucky
* David Vitter of Louisiana
* Kit Bond of Missouri 
* Judd Gregg of New Hampshire
* Richard Burr of North Carolina
* George Voinovich of Ohio
* Tom Coburn of Oklahoma 
* Jim DeMint of South Carolina
* John Thune of South Dakota
* Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas 
* Bob Bennett of Utah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed world. Conservative estimates are that over 120,000 of you dies each year in America from treatable illness that people in other developed countries don&#8217;t die from. Rich, middle class, and poor a like. Insured and uninsured. Men, women, children, and babies. This is what being 37th in quality of healthcare means.</p>
<p>I know that many of you are angry and frustrated that REPUBLICANS! In congress are dragging their feet and trying to block TRUE healthcare reform. What republicans want is just a taxpayer bailout of the DISGRACEFUL GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance industry, and the DISGRACEFUL GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare industry. A trillion dollar taxpayer funded private health insurance bailout is all you really get without a robust government-run public option available on day one. Co-OP&#8217;s ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A GOVERNMENT-RUN PUBLIC OPTION. They are a fraud being pushed by the GREED DRIVEN PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance industry that is KILLING YOU!</p>
<p>YOU CANT HAVE AN INSURANCE MANDATE WITHOUT A ROBUST PUBLIC OPTION. MANDATING PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTH INSURANCE AS YOUR ONLY CHOICE WOULD BE A DISASTER AND UNETHICAL, CORRUPT, AND MORALLY REPUGNANT. AND PROBABLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS WELL.</p>
<p>These industries have been slaughtering you and your loved ones like cattle for decades for profit. Including members of congress and their families. These REPUBLICANS are FOOLS!</p>
<p>Republicans and their traitorous allies have been trying to make it look like it&#8217;s President Obama&#8217;s fault for the delays, and foot dragging. But I think you all know better than that. President Obama inherited one of the worst government catastrophes in American history from these REPUBLICANS! And President Obama has done a brilliant job of turning things around, and working his heart out for all of us. </p>
<p>But Republicans think you are just a bunch of stupid, idiot, cash cows with short memories. Just like they did under the Bush administration when they helped Bush and Cheney rape America and the rest of the World.</p>
<p>But you don&#8217;t have to put up with that. And this is what you can do. The Republicans below will be up for reelection on November 2, 2010. Just a little over 13 months from now. And many of you will be able to vote early. So pick some names and tell their voters that their representatives (by name) are obstructing TRUE healthcare reform. And are sellouts to the insurance and medical lobbyist. </p>
<p>Ask them to contact their representatives and tell them that they are going to work to throw them out of office on November 2, 2010, if not before by impeachment, or recall elections. Doing this will give you something more to do to make things better in America. And it will make you feel better too. </p>
<p>There are many resources on the internet that can help you find people to call and contact. For example, many social networking sites can be searched by state, city, or University. Be inventive and creative. I can think of many ways to do this. But be nice. These are your neighbors. And most will want to help.</p>
<p>I know there are a few democrats that have been trying to obstruct TRUE healthcare reform too. But the main problem is the Bush Republicans. Removing them is the best thing tactically to do. On the other hand. If you can easily replace a democrat obstructionist with a supportive democrat, DO IT!</p>
<p>You have been AMAZING!!! my people. Don&#8217;t loose heart. You knew it wasn&#8217;t going to be easy saving the World. <img src='http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>God Bless You</p>
<p>jacksmith — Working Class</p>
<p>I REST MY CASE (<a href='http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/25/why-markets-cant-cure-healthcare/)'>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/0 7/25/why-markets-cant-cure-healthcare/)</a></p>
<p>Republican Senators up for re-election in 2010.</p>
<p>* Richard Shelby of Alabama<br />
* Lisa Murkowski of Alaska<br />
* John McCain of Arizona<br />
* Mel Martinez of Florida<br />
* Johnny Isakson of Georgia<br />
* Mike Crapo of Idaho<br />
* Chuck Grassley of Iowa<br />
* Sam Brownback of Kansas<br />
* Jim Bunning of Kentucky<br />
* David Vitter of Louisiana<br />
* Kit Bond of Missouri<br />
* Judd Gregg of New Hampshire<br />
* Richard Burr of North Carolina<br />
* George Voinovich of Ohio<br />
* Tom Coburn of Oklahoma<br />
* Jim DeMint of South Carolina<br />
* John Thune of South Dakota<br />
* Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas<br />
* Bob Bennett of Utah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark l.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>mark l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>&quot;debt-spending-with-wanton-abandon mindset enjoyed by Bush and continued by Obama&quot;

kinda like saying charlie manson and pol pot were both murderers.  It doesn&#039;t provide the moral superiority that is truly &#039;befitting&#039; one, over the other.

last projection I heard, was that obama would need 10 trillion of debt to cover his spending.  Bush was like dying of cancer, while obama is just a blunt object to the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;debt-spending-with-wanton-abandon mindset enjoyed by Bush and continued by Obama&#8221;</p>
<p>kinda like saying charlie manson and pol pot were both murderers.  It doesn&#8217;t provide the moral superiority that is truly &#8216;befitting&#8217; one, over the other.</p>
<p>last projection I heard, was that obama would need 10 trillion of debt to cover his spending.  Bush was like dying of cancer, while obama is just a blunt object to the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>John K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Folks are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to avoid the &quot;good news.&quot;  I remember this from Clinton&#039;s days when everyone predicted tremendous doom and gloom.  Sorry people, but we will be profitable and successful in the future.  That&#039;s what this country does under Democrats.  Enjoy it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to avoid the &#8220;good news.&#8221;  I remember this from Clinton&#8217;s days when everyone predicted tremendous doom and gloom.  Sorry people, but we will be profitable and successful in the future.  That&#8217;s what this country does under Democrats.  Enjoy it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Raider</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>James Raider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>THE COMING MASSIVE TAX HIKE ON THE MIDDLE CLASS

To initiate an advance on the lengthy economic turnaround, the joy ride of debt-spending-with-wanton-abandon mindset enjoyed by Bush and continued by Obama must be brought to a close.

Here come the real tax increases on Everybody.

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/08/obama-middle-class-income-tax-increases.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE COMING MASSIVE TAX HIKE ON THE MIDDLE CLASS</p>
<p>To initiate an advance on the lengthy economic turnaround, the joy ride of debt-spending-with-wanton-abandon mindset enjoyed by Bush and continued by Obama must be brought to a close.</p>
<p>Here come the real tax increases on Everybody.</p>
<p><a href='http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/08/obama-middle-class-income-tax-increases.html'>http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009 &nbsp;/08/obama-middle-class-income-tax-incre ases.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark l.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>mark l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>can&#039;t wait to see how they &quot;limbo-dance&quot; under the the deficit revisions...the one that was due in July.

the same one that will have to be revised from a predicted 8% unemployment as their working number for tax revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t wait to see how they &#8220;limbo-dance&#8221; under the the deficit revisions&#8230;the one that was due in July.</p>
<p>the same one that will have to be revised from a predicted 8% unemployment as their working number for tax revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Davis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>As I read the numbers behind the employment rate, no one seems to be reporting that the rate is based on 422,000 deleted from the labor force from June.  Could it be just a coincidence that the numbers would be &quot;boost&quot; to the President just when he needs it for healthcare, etc.?

And the timing of the positive surprise in GDP &quot;advance estimates&quot; to be revised Aug. 27 along with the upward revisions of what was inherited.
Please do some real reporting on how government departments of Commerce and Labor could just possibly make positive moves that surprised outside experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read the numbers behind the employment rate, no one seems to be reporting that the rate is based on 422,000 deleted from the labor force from June.  Could it be just a coincidence that the numbers would be &#8220;boost&#8221; to the President just when he needs it for healthcare, etc.?</p>
<p>And the timing of the positive surprise in GDP &#8220;advance estimates&#8221; to be revised Aug. 27 along with the upward revisions of what was inherited.<br />
Please do some real reporting on how government departments of Commerce and Labor could just possibly make positive moves that surprised outside experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/08/07/5-political-impacts-of-todays-jobs-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>mbh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=1459#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>After the last recession, I told my peers that the so-called recovery was balancing on toothpicks. There were no changes to how Americans moved forward and reliance on consumer spending only seems to have exacerbated the current plunder of the current recession.

We all know the housing debockle started the economic decline, and it was outrageous that Greenspan said he could not foresee it coming - I and my peers certainly did, although at the time, we didn&#039;t see it having the level of devastation that it has had.

I look at this anticipated recovery a little like losing weight - if we recover in a slower and more methodical manner, making meaningful changes and as a nation coming together to rebuild our economic system, then maybe the severity of the next recession (which you can bet there will be another recession), won&#039;t be as catastrophic.  

What I haven&#039;t seen are measures to ensure against some of the past mistakes from occurring again.  Why hasn&#039;t there been an overhaul of the SEC?  Why hasn&#039;t there been any information about changes and replacing those in charge who were responsible for people like Madoff to exist? Why is the current administration not requiring the banks to start lending again. Why is private industry not being allowed to borrow - but instead are barely hanging on? Why aren&#039;t consumers with good credit allowed to refinance their homes to more competitive rates if their balances exceed Fannie Mae limits? I think there are a lot of crucial areas for improvement that the Press is not addressing on a daily basis as much as they should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the last recession, I told my peers that the so-called recovery was balancing on toothpicks. There were no changes to how Americans moved forward and reliance on consumer spending only seems to have exacerbated the current plunder of the current recession.</p>
<p>We all know the housing debockle started the economic decline, and it was outrageous that Greenspan said he could not foresee it coming &#8211; I and my peers certainly did, although at the time, we didn&#8217;t see it having the level of devastation that it has had.</p>
<p>I look at this anticipated recovery a little like losing weight &#8211; if we recover in a slower and more methodical manner, making meaningful changes and as a nation coming together to rebuild our economic system, then maybe the severity of the next recession (which you can bet there will be another recession), won&#8217;t be as catastrophic.  </p>
<p>What I haven&#8217;t seen are measures to ensure against some of the past mistakes from occurring again.  Why hasn&#8217;t there been an overhaul of the SEC?  Why hasn&#8217;t there been any information about changes and replacing those in charge who were responsible for people like Madoff to exist? Why is the current administration not requiring the banks to start lending again. Why is private industry not being allowed to borrow &#8211; but instead are barely hanging on? Why aren&#8217;t consumers with good credit allowed to refinance their homes to more competitive rates if their balances exceed Fannie Mae limits? I think there are a lot of crucial areas for improvement that the Press is not addressing on a daily basis as much as they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
