<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate change: 3.6 degrees or $46 trillion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/09/28/climate-change-3-degrees-or-46-trillion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/09/28/climate-change-3-degrees-or-46-trillion/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/09/28/climate-change-3-degrees-or-46-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>drewbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2065#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>your updated link 404&#039;s me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your updated link 404&#8242;s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/09/28/climate-change-3-degrees-or-46-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2065#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>The reason they are not investing in atmospheric scrubbers, planting trees, or any other tech approach to reducing existing CO2 levels is because they will not fit into a cap n trade market model. In the end, it is all just a mask for the creation of a carbon market which banks and investment houses hope will be the next bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason they are not investing in atmospheric scrubbers, planting trees, or any other tech approach to reducing existing CO2 levels is because they will not fit into a cap n trade market model. In the end, it is all just a mask for the creation of a carbon market which banks and investment houses hope will be the next bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
