<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free markets and mass transit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/10/14/free-markets-and-mass-transit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/10/14/free-markets-and-mass-transit/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonono</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/10/14/free-markets-and-mass-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>nonono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2303#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>If we could have just one example of a transit system that respects free-market principles, instead of mobbing up by adding dozens of city/county government officials to its board, then making unrealistic promises about service and unbelievable projections about traffic levels, and sticking the local government with the bond, all the while employing surly and underqualified people who cannot be made to operate their filthy vehicles safely, or to keep their stations crime-free, or to make their fares competitive with rider demand... then we might have the beginning of a conservative argument for mass transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we could have just one example of a transit system that respects free-market principles, instead of mobbing up by adding dozens of city/county government officials to its board, then making unrealistic promises about service and unbelievable projections about traffic levels, and sticking the local government with the bond, all the while employing surly and underqualified people who cannot be made to operate their filthy vehicles safely, or to keep their stations crime-free, or to make their fares competitive with rider demand&#8230; then we might have the beginning of a conservative argument for mass transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Shah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/10/14/free-markets-and-mass-transit/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>the Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2303#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Not much here to argue. I don&#039;t particularly care for the highway system bashing... those links nationwide helped build the country after World War II, as if being the only major country NOT completely flattened by six years of all out war wasn&#039;t enough of an advantage. More/better transit would be fantastic, but can never replace highways on any grounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much here to argue. I don&#8217;t particularly care for the highway system bashing&#8230; those links nationwide helped build the country after World War II, as if being the only major country NOT completely flattened by six years of all out war wasn&#8217;t enough of an advantage. More/better transit would be fantastic, but can never replace highways on any grounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
