How Obama is freezing the job market
Let’s assume that the much-hyped White House â€śjobs summitâ€ť turns out to be a free-flowing exchange of ideas and views. Could happen. If that’s the case, then President Barack Obama shouldnâ€™t be shocked if a few CEOs dare suggest that the sweeping-yet-stalled Obama agenda might â€¦ actually â€¦ you know â€¦ no offense, Mr. President â€¦ be contributing to the jobless recovery. (The union and academic invitees will protest mightily, natch.)
CEOs are saying as much amongst themselves. At a recent symposium, Intel boss Paul Otellini, a contributor to both parties, expressed concern about the â€śamount of variability in the systemâ€ť created by the state of policy flux in healthcare, energy and tax policy. â€śIt is very difficult to make a hiring decision,â€ť he said. General Electric chief executive Jeffery Immelt, a strong supporter of Obamaâ€™s cap-and-trade proposal, added he would just like to â€śknow what the rules are.â€ť
All in all, a disturbing replay of the 1930s when FDR’s big changes left business reeling with uncertainty and confusion. The â€śdevil you don’t knowâ€ť and all that.
Small business is certainly with Big Business on this, particularly regarding the mercurial nature of healthcare reform. The substance of ObamaCare continues to morph daily — from the state of the public option to employer mandates to financing expanded coverage â€“ as Senate leader Harry Reid scrounges for votes. On energy, the president will make big promises at Copenhagen even though cap-and-trade looks stillborn in the Senate.
As for financial reform, Senate banking committee chair Chris Dodd has proposed sweeping changes, while the Tim Geithner-Barney Frank version in the House seems beamed in from a universe where the credit crisis never happened. Compromise could prove elusive. Even Obamaâ€™s tax reform panel has delayed releasing its findings.
So Corporate America is about to enter 2010 â€“ an election year â€“ with the fate of the ambitious Obama agenda uncertain. Maybe the only thing for sure is that whatever job-creation package the White House and congressional Democrats eventually gin up, it will likely be a $300 billion or so combo of more transportation spending, more aid to cash-strapped state and local governments and some sort of hiring tax credit.
(And that gets at another critical flaw with the jobs summit. As any of the executives could tell Obama, brainstorming sessions are often the tool-of-choice of the highly ineffective manager. Such confabs are frequently used to give team members the illusion that they are contributing to the idea generation process. In fact, the manager has already made his decision. And that is, more or less, the case with Obama. At the very least, don’t expect any CEO suggestions of lowering personal, corporate or investment tax rates to get even a whiff of consideration from the White House.)
Of course, Obama could pivot and revamp healthcare reform into a more incremental, targeted bill that might actually pass with decent margins in both houses. And while cap-and-trade is gasping for air, a deficit-neutral carbon tax (offsetting payroll taxes) might actually pull in significant Republican support. Maybe even a fat payroll or corporate tax cut.
But the tendency toward election-year gridlock is fast approaching. And for frazzled Corporate America and a frozen job market, gridlock â€“ and the uncertainty that goes with it â€“ is not good.