<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Ryan and the future of the GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconstitutionalist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5625</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisconstitutionalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5625</guid>
		<description>If Ryan ever regretted the vote on Medicare Part D, he must have a short memory. The difference between he and the Democrats in root philosophy in health care is zero. That is why they both put forth Health Care bills. Why? They both believe in the unconstitutional interference in health care by the government using taxes, tax credits to one group so that another benefits. Sounds like a statist to me. Does Ryan&#039;s bill have surface differences. Sure it does. But once you allow an unconstitutional interference, it will end up growing ever larger. 

To those who think that the GOP must start somewhere. How about with constitutional laws? If both parties, including Ryan, continually ignore the Constitution, in time human nature leads you to the same place. That we &quot;must start somewhere&quot; and &quot;not be too picky about voting records&quot; has been a hallmark call for the GOP for decades. Where did it get the country? What percent of of GOP in Senate and House voted for Medicare Act of 1965? Two shy of 50%. That is dangerously close to a majority. And over 40 years ago. On a bill often decried by GOP apologists as one-sided vote. When again did the GOP lose its small constitutional government compass? A Republican, incidently from Wisconsin, even helped write the Medicare 1965 bill. 

from an AMA article on it see below excerpt: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/medicare.pdf

The Byrnes Bill
In contrast to the largely Democrat-backed King-Anderson bill, Republicans in Congress lent their general support to the Byrnes bill. “The bill was submitted by Congressman Thomas W. Byrnes of Wisconsin. Like Eldercare, it called for coverage of hospital and physician services for the aged through the purchase of private insurance. Administration, however, was to be federal. Financing was to come two-thirds from general revenues and one third from deductions on the individual pension checks of those who voluntarily chose to
participate in the program.” (Campion 274)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ryan ever regretted the vote on Medicare Part D, he must have a short memory. The difference between he and the Democrats in root philosophy in health care is zero. That is why they both put forth Health Care bills. Why? They both believe in the unconstitutional interference in health care by the government using taxes, tax credits to one group so that another benefits. Sounds like a statist to me. Does Ryan&#8217;s bill have surface differences. Sure it does. But once you allow an unconstitutional interference, it will end up growing ever larger. </p>
<p>To those who think that the GOP must start somewhere. How about with constitutional laws? If both parties, including Ryan, continually ignore the Constitution, in time human nature leads you to the same place. That we &#8220;must start somewhere&#8221; and &#8220;not be too picky about voting records&#8221; has been a hallmark call for the GOP for decades. Where did it get the country? What percent of of GOP in Senate and House voted for Medicare Act of 1965? Two shy of 50%. That is dangerously close to a majority. And over 40 years ago. On a bill often decried by GOP apologists as one-sided vote. When again did the GOP lose its small constitutional government compass? A Republican, incidently from Wisconsin, even helped write the Medicare 1965 bill. </p>
<p>from an AMA article on it see below excerpt: <a href='http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/medicare.pdf'>http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/ mm/369/medicare.pdf</a></p>
<p>The Byrnes Bill<br />
In contrast to the largely Democrat-backed King-Anderson bill, Republicans in Congress lent their general support to the Byrnes bill. “The bill was submitted by Congressman Thomas W. Byrnes of Wisconsin. Like Eldercare, it called for coverage of hospital and physician services for the aged through the purchase of private insurance. Administration, however, was to be federal. Financing was to come two-thirds from general revenues and one third from deductions on the individual pension checks of those who voluntarily chose to<br />
participate in the program.” (Campion 274)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5624</guid>
		<description>As some have mentioned, Ryan does not have a perfect voting record. He supported Medicare Part D due to inclusion of HSAs, something that he has always championed (he still regrets the vote).

However, he is extremely intelligent and personally friendly, and has a great staff with great ideas. If the GOP puts Ryan out front, the future could be bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As some have mentioned, Ryan does not have a perfect voting record. He supported Medicare Part D due to inclusion of HSAs, something that he has always championed (he still regrets the vote).</p>
<p>However, he is extremely intelligent and personally friendly, and has a great staff with great ideas. If the GOP puts Ryan out front, the future could be bright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5616</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5616</guid>
		<description>Paul Ryan would be my pick for president in 2012.

I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s the best time for him to consider a run.

I do know that he has shown now for several years that he is head and shoulders above any in congress in grasping the big economic picture.      I am a regular watcher of the Fed hearings and I have seen him on CNBC several times.        If the wolves don&#039;t get him he has a tremendous future.      I just hope he doesn&#039;t have to sell his soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ryan would be my pick for president in 2012.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the best time for him to consider a run.</p>
<p>I do know that he has shown now for several years that he is head and shoulders above any in congress in grasping the big economic picture.      I am a regular watcher of the Fed hearings and I have seen him on CNBC several times.        If the wolves don&#8217;t get him he has a tremendous future.      I just hope he doesn&#8217;t have to sell his soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5615</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine why anyone would want to reform the GOP.  It&#039;s a fool&#039;s errand. The GOP is the biggest impediment to conservative rule. It is a sham party that exists merely to provide the illusion of choice. The history of the GOP since Franklin Delano Stalin is one of uninterrrupted surrender negotiations. Dump the GOP and we can have a conservative party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine why anyone would want to reform the GOP.  It&#8217;s a fool&#8217;s errand. The GOP is the biggest impediment to conservative rule. It is a sham party that exists merely to provide the illusion of choice. The history of the GOP since Franklin Delano Stalin is one of uninterrrupted surrender negotiations. Dump the GOP and we can have a conservative party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. Sadowski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Sadowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>Paul Ryan is a massive liar. He speaks for things that he consistently votes against. He has always voted against fiscal responsibility. I cannot understand the ignorance of those who speak in favor of his candidacy. They themselves must be the liars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ryan is a massive liar. He speaks for things that he consistently votes against. He has always voted against fiscal responsibility. I cannot understand the ignorance of those who speak in favor of his candidacy. They themselves must be the liars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>I do wish Ryan would run for the Senate one day.  By gaining national name recognition as a up and coming GOPer in the House he would have an easier time with winning the primary and then the general for a Senate seat.  Hell who knows if this country is still around in 15 to 20 years he then would have a great jumping off pt for a presidential run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do wish Ryan would run for the Senate one day.  By gaining national name recognition as a up and coming GOPer in the House he would have an easier time with winning the primary and then the general for a Senate seat.  Hell who knows if this country is still around in 15 to 20 years he then would have a great jumping off pt for a presidential run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>I too have been watching for a solid conservative fiscal to come to the forefront in this heated political climate. Ryan is as solid as they get. We would never have a viable candidate if we start applying perfect voting one up or down someone&#039;s political scale. We do need a candidate with a clean background and experience. Ryan has both and the man bears watching and support for the office of President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have been watching for a solid conservative fiscal to come to the forefront in this heated political climate. Ryan is as solid as they get. We would never have a viable candidate if we start applying perfect voting one up or down someone&#8217;s political scale. We do need a candidate with a clean background and experience. Ryan has both and the man bears watching and support for the office of President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>TE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>Ryan was one of the chief people on the GOP side pushing TARP.  If that was not crony capitalism, then what is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan was one of the chief people on the GOP side pushing TARP.  If that was not crony capitalism, then what is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see that finally someone is coming out with an explicit message that being pro-markets does not mean toadying up to big business.  The biggest businesses love big government, because they can use it to stay big, get bigger, and keep competitors away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that finally someone is coming out with an explicit message that being pro-markets does not mean toadying up to big business.  The biggest businesses love big government, because they can use it to stay big, get bigger, and keep competitors away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. Sadowski</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/14/paul-ryan-and-the-future-of-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Sadowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=2908#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>Paul Ryan has been an abysmal failure in congress. He has never not voted to increase the public debt. If you don&#039;t believe me go and check out his voting record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ryan has been an abysmal failure in congress. He has never not voted to increase the public debt. If you don&#8217;t believe me go and check out his voting record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
