<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Washington Consensus: taxes, taxes and more taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/29/the-new-washington-consensus-taxes-taxes-and-more-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/29/the-new-washington-consensus-taxes-taxes-and-more-taxes/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Abramson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2009/12/29/the-new-washington-consensus-taxes-taxes-and-more-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Abramson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=3032#comment-6641</guid>
		<description>About: WSJ &amp; VAT

It would be wrong, let alone politically impossible, to add a U.S. VAT on top of existing taxes.  When Japan instituted its VAT, to assure adoption, it was done along with an overall tax reduction.  

But, as a revenue-neutral substitute for the corporate income tax, the VAT in itself would have positive implications for the U.S. economy because it is border-adjustable, i.e., imports would be subject to the tax and exports would subtract the tax.  Thus, U.S. corporations and workers would be in a more competitive position at home and abroad.  Furthermore, eliminating the corporate income tax would do away with the double-taxation of dividends; the U.S. would become a magnet for foreign investment, and U.S. multinationals would no longer have an incentive to park funds abroad in lower-taxed countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About: WSJ &amp; VAT</p>
<p>It would be wrong, let alone politically impossible, to add a U.S. VAT on top of existing taxes.  When Japan instituted its VAT, to assure adoption, it was done along with an overall tax reduction.  </p>
<p>But, as a revenue-neutral substitute for the corporate income tax, the VAT in itself would have positive implications for the U.S. economy because it is border-adjustable, i.e., imports would be subject to the tax and exports would subtract the tax.  Thus, U.S. corporations and workers would be in a more competitive position at home and abroad.  Furthermore, eliminating the corporate income tax would do away with the double-taxation of dividends; the U.S. would become a magnet for foreign investment, and U.S. multinationals would no longer have an incentive to park funds abroad in lower-taxed countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
