Why U.S. labor markets may stay in a funk

March 22, 2010

“The Labor Market in the Great Recession” is an interesting new paper that looks at where the job market may be heading, as well as how it has fared the past few years. The latter points first:

Unemployment rose from a pre-recession minimum of 4.4 percent to reach 10.1 percent in October 2009. This increase—5.7 percentage points—is the largest postwar upswing in the unemployment rate. It dwarfs the rise in joblessness in the two most recent recessions in 1990 and 2001, when in each case unemployment rose by approximately 2.5 percentage points. It dominates even the severe recession of 1973/4 (4.25 percentage points) as well as the combined effects of the double recession of the early 1980s (5 percentage points). There is little doubt that the present downturn is the deepest postwar recession from the perspective of the labor market.

But will the deep downturn be followed by a rapid rise? Don’t count on it, the authors say:

The resemblance of these trends to the similar breakdown in match efficiency that accompanied the European unemployment problem of the 1980s raises the concern of persistent unemployment, or hysteresis, in U.S. unemployment going forward. We consider a range of possible sources that might lead to hysteresis, including sectoral mismatch, extension of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, duration dependence in unemployment outflow rates, and persistence in unemployment brought about by reductions in the rate of worker flows, what Blanchard (2000) has termed sclerosis.

Recent data point to two warning signs going forward. First, the historic decline in unemployment outflow rates has been accompanied by a record rise in long-term unemployment. We show that this is likely to result in a persistent residue of long-term unemployed workers with relatively weak search effectiveness, depressing the strength of the recovery. Second, conventional estimates of the impact of UI duration on the length of unemployment spells suggest that the extension of Emergency Unemployment Compensation starting in June 2008 is likely to have led to a modest increase in long-term unemployment in the recession. Nonetheless, we conclude that, despite these adverse forces, they have not yet reached a magnitude that would augur a European-style hysteresis problem in the U.S. economy in the long run.

6 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Getting more like Europe? You better hope not.

Posted by gotthardbahn | Report as abusive

Something wrong with Europe I’m not aware of? Can’t have a service economy if nobody’s got any money to spend. Even Tory economists and politicians went along with the destigmatizing and long-term support for those without jobs, stimulating the economy at grass-roots level for more or less a decade until the thing eventually turned itself around. Sort of, anyway.

No such luck for those on the pointy end of the stick here. There’ll be blood running in the streets before America’s (former) economy ever recovers. It’s that far out of whack. With not an inch of yield by the TBTF commies at the top, the only way average Americans can get even, much less ahead, is to rip off the major corporations any way they can, sauce for the goose etc.

Makes Europe seem almost sane by comparison.

Posted by The Bell | Report as abusive

Will this funk spread to Asia?

Posted by xencats | Report as abusive

25% real unemployment roars on as companies are loathe to bring on full time workers laden with expensive benefits

You are the most royal dick bag alive.

You bite the pillow for Kudlow.

Posted by Jimmy the Greek | Report as abusive

Jimmy was picked on when he was in school. That is why he is such an angry dork.

Posted by Jimmy the Greek | Report as abusive