James Pethokoukis

Politics and policy from inside Washington

4 ways Congress caused the financial crisis

May 5, 2010

That bankers disdain their new Washington overlords is no surprise. To many of them, Congress is plagued by “unnerving ignorance” and a refusal to admit its own role in the financial crisis. At least that is how a controversial JPMorgan report puts it. Impolitic perhaps, but not inaccurate.

It’s one thing to discuss such grumbles in the executive suite. It’s another to explicitly lay them out in a widely disseminated research report, accompanied by data and a full-color chart for emphasis — in the midst of the delicate financial reform debate in the U.S. Senate, to boot. But that’s what JPMorgan’s James Glassman did in a May 3 economic note.

In last week’s Senate committee interrogation of Goldman Sachs executives, senators displayed “confusion about our market economy,” according to Glassman, along with plenty of unearned self-righteousness. He snarkily noted that the economic implosion of rust-belt Michigan, home of Carl Levin, the committee chairman, had nothing to do with esoteric derivatives.

It’s not news that many senators appear to have only a tenuous grasp of the financial industry. But Glassman’s larger point is more relevant. It’s not just that Congress doesn’t understand what Goldman, as a market-maker, does — it’s also that elected officials may not recognize that the financial crisis was rooted in Washington as well as Wall Street.

A similar point is made in new study by Ross Levine of Brown University, “An Autopsy of the U.S. Financial System.” Bankers may have rushed to create fancy new securities, but it was legislators who enabled risky behavior by housing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — and failed to instill watchdogs like the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission with the backbone needed to rein in risky activities. In detail, Levine makes these points that illustrate the role of Congress:

1) Credit Ratings Agencies. While the crisis does not have a single cause, the behavior of the credit rating agencies is a defining characteristic. It is impossible to imagine the current crisis without the activities of the NRSROs. And, it is difficult to imagine the behavior of the NRSROs without the regulations that permitted, protected, and encouraged their activities. … Rather the evidence is most consistent with the view that regulatory policies and Congressional laws protected and encouraged the behavior of NRSROs.

2) Credit Default Swaps. I am suggesting that the evolution of the CDS market, the fragility of the banks, and the Fed’s capital rules illustrate a key feature of the financial crisis that is frequently ignored. The problems with CDSs and bank capital were not a surprise in 2008; there was ample warning that things were going awry. Senior government policymakers created policies that encouraged excessive risk taking by bankers and adhered to those policies over many years even as they learned about the ramifications of their policies.

3) The SEC and Investment Banks. Consider three interrelated SEC decisions regarding the regulation of investment banks. First, the SEC in 2004 exempted the five largest investment banks from the net capital rule, which was a 1975 rule for computing minimum capital standards at broker- dealers. Second, in a related, coordinated 2004 policy change, the SEC enacted a rule that induced the five investment banks to become “consolidated supervised entities” (CSEs): The SEC would oversee the entire financial firm. Specifically, the SEC now had responsibility for supervising the holding company, broker-dealer affiliates, and all other affiliates on a consolidated basis. Third, the SEC neutered its ability to conduct consolidated supervision of major investment banks. … The combination of these three policies contributed to the onset, magnitude, and breadth of the financial crisis. The SEC’s decisions created enormous latitude and incentives for investment banks to increase risk, and they did.

4) Fannie and Freddie. Deterioration in the financial condition of the GSEs was not a surprise. … But, Congress did not respond and allowed increasingly fragile GSEs to endanger the entire financial system. It is difficult to discern why. Some did not want to jeopardize the increased provision of affordable housing. Many received generous financial support from the GSEs in return for their protection. For the purposes of this paper, the critical issue is that policymakers did not respond as the GSEs became systemically fragile. Again, I am not arguing that the timing, extent, and full nature of the housing bubble were perfectly known. I am arguing that policymakers created incentives for massive risk-taking by the GSEs and then did not respond to information that this risk-taking threatened the financial system.

Of course, even senators who do understand finance may choose to indulge in ignorant-seeming grandstanding for political and electoral reasons. JPMorgan, in turn, has distanced itself from Glassman’s views, presumably to smooth any ruffled political feathers. Even if the bank’s management secretly agrees with its economist, it’s about as likely to say so as members of Congress are to admit their enormous shortcomings.

Comments

The shortcomings, ineptitude and corruption of Congress are legendary. That they allowed the creation of the financial weapons you mention (and some that you studiously avoid bringing up) is bad enough, but in no way mitigates Wall Street culpability for the economic assassinations deliberately committed using those weapons.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive
 

THE ENTIRE COUNTRY SHOULD HAVE A MANDATORY READING OF, “Architects of Ruin” by Albert Schweizer. 2009

BILL CLINTON–BARACK OBAMA–JESSE JACKSON–ROBERT RUBIN–BARNEY FRANK–CHRIS DODD–RAHM EMANUEL. How the politicians with the help of ACORN etc forced the banks to lend to people who had no credit scores. The beginning of the subprime mess.

Good old Rahm who is one of the people in charge of “cleaning it up” made over $46,000 an hour as a board member of Freddie Mac.

The book goes on and on……

While these were mostly the Democrats—why can’t the Republicans expose this now?

Posted by AgentRose | Report as abusive
 

AT SOME POINT WHERE ARE THE CONGRESSMEN, CONGRESSWOMEN, AND SENATORS WHO ARE GOING TO “STAND” WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO FINANCED THE MESS AND WHO ARE PAYING TO CLEAN IT UP WITH TARPS AND EVEN, GENEROULSY, ARE OFFERING TO HELP CLEAN UP GREECE’S PROBLEMS?????

NO MORE BAILOUTS. NO MORE BANK BAILOUTS. NO MORE GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS. NO MORE FREDDIE MAC BAILOUTS. NO MORE GREEK BAILOUTS!!!!

WE NEED A PROPOSITION 13 FOR THE UNITED STATES!!!

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_ id=5682

Posted by AgentRose | Report as abusive
 

The list of causes is incomplete. It really began with Jimmy Carter (naturally, did that idiot do *anything* right) when he pushed through the original Community Development Act to get “help” for people who “can’t qualify for mortgages.” Then Bill Clinton and his willing accomplices in Congress made it MUCH WORSE, by strengthening the act, then he sicced Janet Reno on banks that were abiding by sound banking principles to force them to make loans TO UNQUALIFIED PEOPLE, by threatening them with “redlining” lawsuits. Along comes Gramm, Leach, Briley (removing the Glass Steagall act) and the real sharks of Wall Street (investment banks) were turned loose. The government was pushing this on all fronts, and the investment bankers did what comes naturally, they invented a way to handle all the bad debt without any risk to themselves (CDS.) When the Bush administration began to push to tighten the rules, we got Maxine Waters, Barnie Frank, Chris Dodd and many others of our rather stupid congress critters lining up to defend Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae by saying really dishonest and stupid things like “they are sound.” I really don’t know why some reporter won’t try to unravel this apparent mystery (it’s really not) and report the real facts, along with the culprits in Congress. It’s disgusting, and typical of what has happened with the advent of career politicians who are much more interested in their own power and position, than actually doing something for the people they are supposed to represent.

Posted by Webrider | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •