Why economy may not save 2010 Democrats

June 15, 2010

“Hope” wasn’t just a major theme of Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. It also might be a one-word summation of the 2010 midterm campaign strategy devised by the White House and Democrats on Capitol Hill. They hope voters get more comfortable with healthcare reform. They hope voters really care about the technocratic bank bill. And, most importantly, they hope voters begin to sense some impact of a slowly recovering economy on their personal financial situation.

Oh, and they sure hope the dang hole gets plugged, of course. It’s that last one that’s really biting Democrats at the moment. Obama’s approval rating, after more than a year on the downswing, had finally turned around in April. Then came the gusher in the Gulf. The president’s numbers are now at the lowest level of his presidency. According to weekly Gallup polling, just 46 percent of Americans approve of his job performance (with 46 percent disapproving). If history is a guide, Democrats will suffer heavy losses should Obama’s low numbers persist into November.

Certainly the BP “well control incident” — as the company might put it — is playing a big role in all this. Polls consistently show a ten percentage point gap between those who think Obama is blowing it vs. those who think he’s on top of things. And the closer voters are to the spill, the more critical they are. Just take a look at these numbers from Public Policy Polling. While Louisianans are way angrier with BP than Washington by 53 percent to 29 percent, they are pretty mad at both. By 50 percent to 35 percent, they now think President George W. Bush did a better job handling Hurricane Katrina than Obama’s job responding to the oil spill. Maybe Obama’s prime-time energy speech will turn things around. We’ll see.

But the prime shaper of the 2010 political backdrop is still the economy. A growing gaggle of economists now fret that growth will decelerate in the second half of 2010. Even bullish Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve is looking at a Plan B should the economy slow sharply. No double-dip recession, perhaps, but not enough economic oomph to dramatically lower the unemployment rate. In fact, it may again top the 10 percent level before year end. And if it doesn’t, the reason is more likely a shrinking labor force — as measured by government statisticians — than a surge of new jobs.

And the following numbers will only add to the sense of deepening Democratic gloom. A poll for NPR looked at the state of the races in 70 competitive House districts. Just 41 percent of voters favored Dems vs. 49 percent for the GOP. In the 30 most-competitive districts currently held by Democrats, Republicans led 48 percent to 39 percent. And in the 60 Dem districts overall, Obama had just a 40 percent approval rating.

But these results may be the ones most worrisome to Obamacrats in Washington. Only 37 percent of voters in the Dem districts believed the following: “President Obama’s economic policies helped avert an even worse crisis, and are laying the foundation for our eventual economic recovery.” On the other hand, 57 percent agreed with this statement: “President Obama’s economic policies have run up a record federal deficit while failing to end the recession or slow the record pace of job losses.”

In Washington, they call that “losing the narrative.” Democrats can only hope they can somehow get it back.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

[…] Why economy may not save 2010 Democrats James Pethokoukis […]

Posted by Links 6/16/10 « naked capitalism | Report as abusive

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by jamie davis and mark grip, tom serona. tom serona said: Why economy may not save 2010 Democrats | Analysis & Opinion |: But the prime shaper of the 2010 political backdro… http://bit.ly/cx5p2W […]

Posted by Tweets that mention Why economy may not save 2010 Democrats | Analysis & Opinion | — Topsy.com | Report as abusive

[…] James Pethokoukis […]

Posted by “Why The Economy may not save 2010 Democrats” « Newsbeat1 | Report as abusive

The first victim of the Obamacare “death panels” was the Democrat Party’s power of illusion… They revealed that (a) they were at least as corrupt as any politicians ever, and (b) they actually had union thugs beating people instead of showing tolerance and celebrating diversity.

The Tea Party movements are the direct offspring of Americans waking up and smelling what Barack is cooking for them…

Posted by setnaffa | Report as abusive

Obama continues to strike me as a front man for persons who prefer to travel invisibly in his slipstream. I can’t shake the suspicion that those gray eminences have a surprise or two for us, to be sprung much closer to the elections. The largely unspent funds from the “stimulus bill” could prove to be an important component in their strategy for staving off electoral disaster.

Posted by fporretto | Report as abusive

Wow! Mr. Obama’s handling of the ‘well control incident’ is now viewed more critically than the despised George Bush’s handling of the ‘Gulf hurricane incident’. My my, how things change. Quickly too. As usual, Mr P has it right on in his analysis of the Democrats’ gloomy November prospects. The rest of us outside America can only hope the Democrats take a beating this fall and Mr. Obama eats a healthy serving of humble pie. perhaps even a second slice.

fporretto: Your point is well-taken about late-inning surprises but, to mix metaphors here, such actions may be viewed as a Hail Mary pass and could boomerang badly.

Posted by Gotthardbahn | Report as abusive

The reasons why Dems are losing are as follows: (1) they’re supposed to be Democrats, not Republicans, (2) they seem incapable of explaining anything simply and clearly, (3) they are spineless, (4) they are clueless, and (5) they have sold out to big business.

The ONLY reason why Democratic candidates will win against a Republican opponent is because the Republicans are choosing people who are completely insane.

Posted by sharonsj | Report as abusive

[…] by Big Citizen on June 17, 2010 Hope: “Hope” wasn’t just a major theme of Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. It also […]

Posted by Hope and Change « Big Citizen | Report as abusive