<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just how much defense spending can be cut?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/11/23/just-how-much-defense-spending-can-be-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/11/23/just-how-much-defense-spending-can-be-cut/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDN_finance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/11/23/just-how-much-defense-spending-can-be-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-10161</link>
		<dc:creator>CDN_finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=5160#comment-10161</guid>
		<description>Seems like 1% of GDP (from your chart) is going to war spending... so that&#039;s $150B savings once the wars stop. Plus, pulling down troop numbers in Germany, Japan, South Korea are probably worth another $50B/yr. That&#039;s an easy $200B a year savings. Seems worth it and easy to me... Maybe cutting back on building new/more aircraft carriers and submarines would knock off another big chunk of change too.

Also, I find it more than slightly disingenuous to compare current defense spending to Reagan-era defense spending, when the govt was actively and purposefully increasing military spending to intimidate Russia. I&#039;d be curious to see how that chart looks going back to the 30s, through the depression, through post-Korea/pre-Vietnam decade, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like 1% of GDP (from your chart) is going to war spending&#8230; so that&#8217;s $150B savings once the wars stop. Plus, pulling down troop numbers in Germany, Japan, South Korea are probably worth another $50B/yr. That&#8217;s an easy $200B a year savings. Seems worth it and easy to me&#8230; Maybe cutting back on building new/more aircraft carriers and submarines would knock off another big chunk of change too.</p>
<p>Also, I find it more than slightly disingenuous to compare current defense spending to Reagan-era defense spending, when the govt was actively and purposefully increasing military spending to intimidate Russia. I&#8217;d be curious to see how that chart looks going back to the 30s, through the depression, through post-Korea/pre-Vietnam decade, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
