<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economists weigh in on Obama-GOP tax deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/08/economists-weigh-in-on-obama-gop-tax-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/08/economists-weigh-in-on-obama-gop-tax-deal/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inugomontoya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/08/economists-weigh-in-on-obama-gop-tax-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-10394</link>
		<dc:creator>Inugomontoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=5277#comment-10394</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to print the nutty Gitlitz statement so often in comments: that repetition of inane propaganda is pure Jos. Goebbels stuff.  Come to think of it, Gitlitz&#039; doctrinaire, thought-deprived opinion is also pretty Nazi-oid.  Like the other Nazis, he needs a truth squad, so here&#039;s the non-Nazi take on it: 1- tax hike/extension didn&#039;t do much anyway for last 10 years: wages stagnant, real growth trivial, deficit blown out since at best 1/3 of a tax cut is retrieved as taxes (and most of that thru bracket-creep). 2- speaking of creeps, Gitlitz is also wrong about pricing in tax &quot;cuts&quot;: biz always has an eye on taxes, but as one of the wiser commentators mentioned,it&#039;s more about opportunity and perceived risk (as in nonimpact of accelerated depreciation schedules). 3- since &quot;cuts&quot; have been there for 8-10 years, they have little impact other than the dramatically huge extension of cap gains break.  4- So why does Pethokoukis bring in crackpot economists -- is Gitlitz the Nazi the ringer, kinda like every village needs its idiot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to print the nutty Gitlitz statement so often in comments: that repetition of inane propaganda is pure Jos. Goebbels stuff.  Come to think of it, Gitlitz&#8217; doctrinaire, thought-deprived opinion is also pretty Nazi-oid.  Like the other Nazis, he needs a truth squad, so here&#8217;s the non-Nazi take on it: 1- tax hike/extension didn&#8217;t do much anyway for last 10 years: wages stagnant, real growth trivial, deficit blown out since at best 1/3 of a tax cut is retrieved as taxes (and most of that thru bracket-creep). 2- speaking of creeps, Gitlitz is also wrong about pricing in tax &#8220;cuts&#8221;: biz always has an eye on taxes, but as one of the wiser commentators mentioned,it&#8217;s more about opportunity and perceived risk (as in nonimpact of accelerated depreciation schedules). 3- since &#8220;cuts&#8221; have been there for 8-10 years, they have little impact other than the dramatically huge extension of cap gains break.  4- So why does Pethokoukis bring in crackpot economists &#8212; is Gitlitz the Nazi the ringer, kinda like every village needs its idiot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
