<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin vs. Simon Johnson and Washington wisdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/16/sarah-palin-vs-simon-johnson-and-washington-wisdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/16/sarah-palin-vs-simon-johnson-and-washington-wisdom/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2010/12/16/sarah-palin-vs-simon-johnson-and-washington-wisdom/comment-page-1/#comment-10340</link>
		<dc:creator>aeli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=5354#comment-10340</guid>
		<description>Is Mr. Pethokoukis -- are you -- serious?  

Much like this hollow post, the Roadmap for America is big on general talk and completely thin on details or actual plans.  Roadmaps are laudatory and constructive when they present a vision, but can also be obfuscatory when used as stall tactics (both the post and the Roadmap for America are of the latter type).  

And that&#039;s for the very reason that Mr. Johnson points out -- that Republicans aren&#039;t really serious about cutting military spending or any other entitlements that damage their political popularity.  Mr. Pethokoukis, you should read Mr. Johnson&#039;s article, entitled &quot;Paul Ryan is Not a Fiscal Conservative,&quot; which is available free of charge: http://baselinescenario.com/2010/11/04/paul-ryan-is-not-a-fiscal-conservative/.  Perhaps a substantive response would serve you readers best.

Also, the notion that Simon Johnson is somehow your standard &quot;Washington insider&quot; is a lazy and transparent way of saying &quot;I don&#039;t like what he says.&quot;  Beyond that, it&#039;s also absurd.  Johnson has been highly critical of most Washington policies, ranging from Dodd-Frank, the bailouts, Obama&#039;s light posture towards banks and financial institutions, etc.  If you&#039;re not willing to do your research, perhaps you could go as far to choose a more appropriate, albeit hollow, dismissive term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Mr. Pethokoukis &#8212; are you &#8212; serious?  </p>
<p>Much like this hollow post, the Roadmap for America is big on general talk and completely thin on details or actual plans.  Roadmaps are laudatory and constructive when they present a vision, but can also be obfuscatory when used as stall tactics (both the post and the Roadmap for America are of the latter type).  </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s for the very reason that Mr. Johnson points out &#8212; that Republicans aren&#8217;t really serious about cutting military spending or any other entitlements that damage their political popularity.  Mr. Pethokoukis, you should read Mr. Johnson&#8217;s article, entitled &#8220;Paul Ryan is Not a Fiscal Conservative,&#8221; which is available free of charge: <a href='http://baselinescenario.com/2010/11/04/paul-ryan-is-not-a-fiscal-conservative/.'>http://baselinescenario.com/2010/11/04/p aul-ryan-is-not-a-fiscal-conservative/.</a>  Perhaps a substantive response would serve you readers best.</p>
<p>Also, the notion that Simon Johnson is somehow your standard &#8220;Washington insider&#8221; is a lazy and transparent way of saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t like what he says.&#8221;  Beyond that, it&#8217;s also absurd.  Johnson has been highly critical of most Washington policies, ranging from Dodd-Frank, the bailouts, Obama&#8217;s light posture towards banks and financial institutions, etc.  If you&#8217;re not willing to do your research, perhaps you could go as far to choose a more appropriate, albeit hollow, dismissive term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
