5+ questions for … Sen. John Thune
Sen. John Thune isnâ€™t running for president (at least this time around), choosing instead to fight big, wasteful government from his outpost on Capitol Hill.
Heâ€™s just reintroduced a sweeping budget reform bill that would make it easier to cut discretionary spending and bring some honest accounting for so-called entitlements. I chatted with the South Dakota Republican earlier today about his bill and the current budget debate. Some excerpts:
First, will the Senate come close to matching the 2011 budget cuts passed by the House?
I hope we can, but itâ€™s really hard to handicap that one because the Democrats havenâ€™t put anything out yet and the president has gone radio silent. I think what Democrats may do is come up with something along the lines of the presidentâ€™s [discretionary spending] freeze proposal and maybe start there. But I think the Republican House level was reasonable and something we should try to get to in the Senate.
How about raising the debt ceiling?
To attract any Republican votes to a debt ceiling increase, youâ€™re going to have to come up with some serious spending reductions and some budget process reforms. There is going to have to be a significant incentive.
How would the budget process be different under your proposal? Would it have affected the passage of healthcare reform?
It would make it more difficult to abuse the emergency designation which is how a lot of spending has been put through the last couple years. They just waive pay-go and declare an emergency. Thereâ€™s a lot of abuse of the rules we have today. Clearly what weâ€™ve been doing doesnâ€™t work. Weâ€™ve only had four years in the past 34 when all the appropriations bills have been passed on time.
[Regarding healthcare],Â what we do is prevent the double counting of trust fund revenues, which is how they were able to fund [the plan]. [Democrats] were able to say they were extending the lifespan of Medicare at the same time they were using Medicare payroll tax increases and spending reductions to finance their new entitlement program. So it would have dramatically changed that debate and forced them to come up with real revenue sources instead of the phony revenue sources they used.
Reuters has lots of readers outside the country who must look at this process and think it insane.
The budget process really is a national embarrassment. I was a staffer out here back in the mid-1980s and even at that time I looked at [the budget process] and thought it made no sense whatsoever. You can get through an entire year with a $3.7 trillion enterprise called the federal government and not pass a budget. And there is a pileup with trying to get through 12 appropriations bills every single year. You donâ€™t have any oversight to make sure the money is spent wisely and well. So going to a two-year, biennial budget would help address that.
And right now the budget process actually makes it easier to spend more than to spend less, right?
There is a forward momentum to spend more. When we passed this two-week [continuing resolution] to cut spending by $4 billion, it may be the first time we actually cut spending. [My proposal] requires every budget cycle that Congress actually ratchet spending down. For the first time, [the budget process] would put a straightjacket on Congress and force it to make some of these decisions.